| Literature DB >> 35185226 |
John Stewart1, James R Craig1, Chantelle Clain1, Anne-Marie Hegarty1, Nicholas M Meadows1, Antony Gould1, Caitlin Young1.
Abstract
The COVID-19 global pandemic-related restrictions during 2020 severely impacted the Australian seafood industry, including essential scientific monitoring to support stock assessment and to demonstrate sustainability. Here we detail a novel, collaborative monitoring program between scientists and the seafood industry to generate length and age compositions that were representative of one of the largest, most valuable, and controversial fisheries along eastern Australia, the pre-spawning ocean run fishery for Sea Mullet Mugil cephalus that is predominantly a roe fishery. The standard approach to monitoring this fishery has been to base trained scientific staff at the major processing facility for M. cephalus, where they access whole fish from entire catches to generate representative length and age compositions during the peak season, April to May. Covid-19 restrictions prevented this approach for 2020 in eastern Australia. In recognition that in addition to the high-value roe, all components of the female fish are utilized (heads and guts for bait, bodies for human consumption), a multi-stage, spatially stratified sampling design was investigated. Female heads were retained from randomly selected catches from each of the three major fishing zones and transported to the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries fish laboratory based in Sydney. Head lengths (HLs) were measured and converted to Fork Lengths (FLs) using a HL to FL relationship. The resulting fish length compositions from each catch were subsequently combined based on: (i) relative catch size of females within an ocean zone, and; (ii) the relative reported landings of females in each ocean fishing zone. Otoliths were randomly collected from heads sampled from each ocean zone and used to estimate age. The resulting ocean zone to age matrix was combined with the relative reported landings of female fish in each ocean fishing zone to generate a total female age composition for the fishery. The estimated age composition of females were typical in being mainly between ages 3 and 6, with a strong presence of 4-year olds. This stronger cohort was present as 3-year olds in 2018/19 and 5-year olds in 2020/21, thus providing confidence that our sampling was representative of the fishery. The study reinforces the positive outcomes that can be generated through co-management between scientists and the seafood industry. CrownEntities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Commercial fisheries; Monitoring; Mugil cephalus; Social licence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185226 PMCID: PMC8837805 DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fish Res ISSN: 0165-7836 Impact factor: 2.422
Fig. 1Map of the New South Wales coast showing the 10 ocean zones used for reporting commercial fishery landings, with the total beach haul fishery landings of Mugil cephalus for the decade 2010/11–2019/20.
Fig. 2Mugil cephalus showing measurement of head length (HL) and fork length (FL).
Sample data for Mugil cephalus catches sampled during 2019/20.
| Sample Number | Catch Date | Ocean Zone | Total Catch Weight (kg) | Female Catch Weight (Kg) | Male Catch Weight (Kg) | Proportion Females | Otoliths sampled | Heads measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28/04/2020 | Zone 4 | 14214 | 6559 | 7655 | 0.46 | 31 | 112 |
| 2 | 30/04/2020 | Zone 5 | 10965 | 5560 | 5405 | 0.51 | 17 | 113 |
| 3 | 30/04/2020 | Zone 5 | 6008 | 3168 | 2840 | 0.53 | 9 | 105 |
| 4 | 30/04/2020 | Zone 5 | 4775 | 2431 | 2344 | 0.51 | 7 | 101 |
| 5 | 1/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 10436 | 4635 | 5801 | 0.44 | 14 | 115 |
| 6 | 2/05/2020 | Zone 4 | 23473 | 10475 | 12998 | 0.45 | 49 | 114 |
| 7 | 2/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 10758 | 6148 | 4610 | 0.57 | 18 | 88 |
| 8 | 2/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 2765 | 1524 | 1241 | 0.55 | 5 | 80 |
| 9 | 5/05/2020 | Zone 4 | 5307 | 1802 | 3505 | 0.34 | 8 | 94 |
| 10 | 5/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 4764 | 2947 | 1817 | 0.62 | 9 | 71 |
| 11 | 7/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 1450 | 970 | 480 | 0.67 | 3 | 73 |
| 12 | 11/05/2020 | Zone 3 | 3712 | 1637 | 2075 | 0.44 | 17 | 89 |
| 13 | 11/05/2020 | Zone 4 | 13070 | 5305 | 7765 | 0.41 | 25 | 85 |
| 14 | 11/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 10422 | 6012 | 4410 | 0.58 | 18 | 79 |
| 15 | 12/05/2020 | Zone 1 | 4665 | 2635 | 2030 | 0.56 | 46 | 79 |
| 16 | 12/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 5434 | 3850 | 1584 | 0.71 | 11 | 76 |
| 17 | 13/05/2020 | Zone 4 | 3189 | 1460 | 1729 | 0.46 | 7 | 87 |
| 18 | 14/05/2020 | Zone 3 | 8586 | 4012 | 4574 | 0.47 | 41 | 87 |
| 19 | 15/05/2020 | Zone 3 | 3673 | 1657 | 2016 | 0.45 | 17 | 89 |
| 20 | 16/05/2020 | Zone 1 | 348 | 179 | 169 | 0.51 | 3 | 101 |
| 21 | 20/05/2020 | Zone 1 | 4555 | 1998 | 2557 | 0.44 | 35 | 100 |
| 22 | 22/05/2020 | Zone 3 | 6274 | 2633 | 3641 | 0.42 | 27 | 94 |
| 23 | 23/05/2020 | Zone 5 | 5424 | 3002 | 2422 | 0.55 | 9 | 96 |
| 24 | 24/05/2020 | Zone 1 | 697 | 433 | 264 | 0.62 | 8 | 101 |
| 25 | 25/05/2020 | Zone 1 | 2321 | 956 | 1365 | 0.41 | 17 | 90 |
| 26 | 25/05/2020 | Zone 3 | 4121 | 1694 | 2427 | 0.41 | 18 | 87 |
| 27 | 26/05/2020 | Zone 1 | 1372 | 653 | 719 | 0.48 | 11 | 93 |
| TOTALS | 172778 | 84335 | 88443 | 480 | 2499 |
Summary of the age classes of Mugil cephalus sampled from each ocean zone during 2019/20. The age samples from separate catches within each zone were weighted according to the relative catch sizes.
| Age Class | Zone1 | Zone2 | Zone3 | Zone4 | Zone5 | Zone6 | Zone7 | Zone8 | Zone9 | Zone10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | ||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| 3 | 65 | 25 | 19 | 26 | ||||||
| 4 | 23 | 62 | 61 | 52 | ||||||
| 5 | 16 | 20 | 30 | 24 | ||||||
| 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 14 | ||||||
| 7 | 1 | |||||||||
| 8 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| 9 | 2 | |||||||||
| 10 | 2 | |||||||||
| TOTALS | 120 | 0 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
Multiple linear regression model outputs for fork length (FL) against head length (HL) and sex for Mugil cephalus.
| Model | Coefficient | Estimate | SE | P | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Intercept | -0.10 | 1.83 | NS | 0.85 |
| HL | 4.78 | 0.20 | < 0.01 | ||
| Sex (male) | 4.99 | 2.51 | < 0.05 | ||
| HL:Sex | 0.75 | 0.29 | < 0.05 |
Fig. 3Linear relationships between Head Length (HL) and Fork Length (FL) (1 cm bin) for female and male Mugil cephalus.
Fig. 4Fishery-wide estimates of the length composition of landed female Mugil cephalus in New South Wales 2017/18–2020/21.
Fig. 5Fishery-wide estimates of the age composition of landed female Mugil cephalus in New South Wales 2018/19–2020/21.