Literature DB >> 35185148

Effect of Shengbai Decoction on Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression and Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients After Radical Resection: A Retrospective Study.

Linhua Yao1, Wenming Feng2, Yulong Tao2, Chengwu Tang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Myelosuppression is one of the most common chemotherapy-induced adverse events and results in a series of clinical symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Shengbai decoction (SD) on chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients after radical resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 115 patients with stage II-III GC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection between May 2015 and June 2017 in our hospital. Among these patients, 57 received Shengbai decoction along with adjuvant chemotherapy (SD group), while 58 received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control group). Medical records, including adverse events, the treatment completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, 3-year overall survival (OS), and 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), were compared. RESULTS Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No adverse events related to Shengbai decoction were reported in the SD group. Patients in the SD group had less neutropenia (P=0.0430), thrombocytopenia (P=0.0323), and anemia (P=0.0497). The SD group had a significantly lower probability of dose reduction (P=0.0448). The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy of the SD group was considerably higher than that of the control group (P=0.0398). The SD group had a significantly better 3-year RFS (P=0.0369) and 3-year OS (P=0.0455) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS Shengbai decoction effectively improved postoperative survival of patients with GC by alleviating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and improving the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35185148      PMCID: PMC8876002          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.935936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Gastric cancer (GC), one of the most prevalent malignancies, caused nearly 770 000 deaths in 2020 [1]. D2 gastrectomy is considered a standardized surgical strategy for localized GC in Asian countries [2]. It is also widely proposed by treatment guidelines of Western countries due to the 15-year findings of the Dutch D1/D2 study [3-5]. Nevertheless, approximately 40% of patients develop recurrence within 2 years despite radical resection [6-8]. Various adjuvant chemotherapy regimens have been implemented to control postoperative relapse and improve long-term survival over the past 40 years [9]. However, all the chemotherapy regimens cause toxic adverse events, which harm patient quality of life and treatment compliance [10]. Myelosuppression is one of the most common chemotherapy-induced adverse events and results in a series of clinical symptoms, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia [11]. Severe myelosuppression even leads to treatment dose reduction or discontinuation, which limit treatment efficacy. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been widely used in cancer treatment as integrative therapy [12]. Several studies revealed that CHM can prevent chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression [13-15]. However, the efficacy of CHM varies greatly with the composition [16]. This retrospective study was performed to assess the effect of Shengbai decoction on chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and survival of GC patients after radical resection.

Material and Methods

Patients

A total of 115 patients with stage II–III GC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection between May 2015 and June 2017 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among these patients, 57 received Shengbai decoction along with adjuvant chemotherapy (SD group), and 58 received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control group). Inclusion criteria were: undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy, pathological TNM stage II–III GC [17], ECOG 0–1, age 18–75 years, no previous anti-cancer treatment, adequate organ function, and complete follow-up data. Exclusion criteria were: allergic to any ingredient of the Shengbai decoction, recurrence or death within 6 months after surgery, a history of other malignant tumors, and lost to follow-up. We conducted this study following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and “Good Clinical Practice” guidelines. The Institutional Review Board of the college approved this study (approval no. HZYY-2020100811). All patients signed the informed consent.

Administration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Shengbai Decoction

Postoperative chemotherapy was started within 3 weeks after surgery. The regimens of chemotherapy referred to the NCCN guidelines for GC. Patients decided by themselves whether to receive Shengbai decoction after doctors clarified the potential risks and benefits. Patients signed an additional consent form if they chose to receive Shengbai decoction. The cost of the Shengbai decoction was covered by medical insurance. The Shengbai decoction was administered concurrently with the chemotherapy to the patients of the SD group (taken morning and evening, 30 min after meals, 100 mL per time). The formula of Shengbai decoction consisted of Radix Astragali 10 g, Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae 10 g, Ganoderma Lucidumseu Sinensis 6 g, Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae 10 g, Radix Angelicae Sinensis 10 g, Caulis Spatholobi 15 g, Fructus Ligustri Lucidi 10 g, Rhizoma Polygonati 10 g, Fructus Psoraleae 10 g and Herba Dendrobii 10 g (Table 1).
Table 1

Formula of Shengbai decoction.

Name in ChineseName in EnglishName in LatinDose
Huang QiMilkvetch Root Radix Astragali 10 g
Dan ShenDanshen Root Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae 10 g
Ling ZhiLucid Ganoderma Ganoderma Lucidumseu Sinensis 6 g
Bai ShuLargehead Atractylodes Rhizome Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae 10 g
Dang GuiChinese Angelica Radix Angelicae Sinensis 10 g
Ji Xue TengSuberect Spatholobus Stem Caulis Spatholobi 15 g
Nv Zheng ZiGlossy Privet Fruit Fructus Ligustri Lucidi 10 g
Huang JingSiberian Solomonseal Rhizome Rhizoma Polygonati 10 g
Bu Gu ZhiMalaytea Scurfpea Fruit Fructus Psoraleae 10 g
Shi HuDendrobium Herba Dendrobii 10 g
Treatment-related adverse events were estimated based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). The treatment dose would be reduced to 75% in subsequent treatment courses in case of grade 3–4 hematologic or acute non-hematologic adverse events or grade 2–3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Treatments for myelosuppression were not implemented until grade 3 or worse hematologic adverse events occurred. Chemotherapy was discontinued in the event of disease progression or life-threatening adverse events, or patients’ request for discontinuation. Patients who received fewer than half of the scheduled cycles of chemotherapy were excluded from analysis.

Assessment and Follow-up

All patients underwent comprehensive disease assessment and health monitoring during the chemotherapy phase and the follow-up phase. Follow-up visits were initiated after the chemotherapy ended. In the first postoperative year, patients underwent monthly follow-up visits and then every 3 months until death or last follow-up. Recurrence was diagnosed by imaging examination and, if necessary, cytologic analysis or biopsy. Once recurrence was identified, chemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, or palliative care were implemented.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis and visualization were performed using MedCalc software (version 15.2.2, MedCalc Software, Ltd). Quantitative variables were analyzed using the t test and are presented as mean±standard deviation. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze enumeration variables. Ranked data such as treatment-related adverse events, tumor stage, and tumor differentiation were analyzed by Ridit analysis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the gastrectomy to (i) first recurrence, (ii) last follow-up, or (iii) death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the gastrectomy to death from any cause or the last follow-up. Survival curves were obtained via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Patient Characteristics

Of these patients, 50 had stage II disease and 65 had stage III disease. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Patient characteristics.

Control group (n=58)SD group (n=57)P value
Age (year)55.24±6.2854.36±6.120.4483
Tumor size (cm)3.57±1.133.61±1.250.8574
Gender0.7344
 Male3940
 Female1917
Tumor Stage0.7694
 II2624
 III3233
Tumor differentiation0.9284
 Well89
 Moderately1816
 Poorly2726
 Signet ring cell56
Tumor location0.9642
 Lower2827
 Middle1215
 Upper1412
 Entire43
Regimen of chemotherapy0.8550
 SOX1815
 CapOX2223
 FOLFOX41819
Underlying diseases
 Cardiovascular disease570.5209
 Respiratory disease680.5451
 Diabetes770.9723

Adverse Events and Treatment Completion Rate

Treatment-related adverse events were shown in Table 3. There were no significant differences found in non-hematologic adverse events between the 2 groups. No adverse events related to Shengbai decoction were reported in the SD group. Shengbai decoction significantly relieved chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Patients in the Shengbai decoction group had less neutropenia (P=0.0430), thrombocytopenia (P=0.0323), and anemia (P=0.0497). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Most of the adverse events were controlled by symptomatic treatment and dose reduction. Dose reduction was documented in 16 patients from the control group and 7 patients from the SD group. The SD group had a significantly lower probability of dose reduction (P=0.0448). Despite administration of dose reduction and thorough monitoring and symptomatic treatment, chemotherapy was finally discontinued in 9 patients (8 from the control group and 1 from the SD group). The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy of the SD group was significantly higher than that of the control group (56/57 vs 50/58, P=0.0398).
Table 3

Treatment-related adverse events.

Adverse eventControl group (n=58)SD group (n=57)P value
GradeGrade
12341234
Neutropenia2032423024210.0430
Thrombocytopenia2324202216100.0323
Anemia2125322616210.0416
Nausea/vomiting2425302226200.9129
Diarrhea780065000.3785
Elevated creatinine level520043000.9450
Elevated ALT/AST level330032000.7630
Elevated total serum bilirubin level220032000.7185
Stomatitis741065100.9277
Hand-foot syndrome213219220.6165
Paresthesia20900178000.5435

ALT – alanine aminotransferase; AST – aspartate aminotransferase.

Survival Outcomes

In 30 patients (20 from the control group and 10 from the SD group), recurrence was reported within the first 3 postoperative years. The 3-year RFS rate was 65.52% and 82.76% for the control group and SD group, respectively. The SD group had a significantly better 3-year RFS than the control group [P=0.0369; hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence, 0.4570; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2232 to 0.9355] (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Comparison of 3-year recurrence-free survival between the 2 groups. Recurrence was reported in 30 patients (20 from the control group and 10 from the SD group) within the first 3 postoperative years. The SD group had a significantly better 3-year recurrence-free survival than the control group [P=0.0369; hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence, 0.4570; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2232 to 0.9355]. MedCalc software (version 15.2.2, MedCalc Software Ltd.) was used to create the figure.

There were 25 deaths reported (17 from the control group and 8 from the SD group) within the first 3 postoperative years. The 3-year OS rate was 70.18% and 85.96% for the control group and SD group, respectively. The SD group had a significantly better 3-year OS than the control group (P=0.0455; HR for death, 0.4369; 95% CI, 0.1994 to 0.9575) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Comparison of 3-year overall survival between the 2 groups. There were 25 deaths reported (17 from the control group and 8 from the SD group) within the first 3 postoperative years. The SD group had a significantly better 3-year overall survival than the control group (P=0.0455; HR for death, 0.4369; 95% CI, 0.1994 to 0.9575). MedCalc software (version 15.2.2, MedCalc Software, Ltd.) was used to create the figure.

Discussion

China is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of GC, and about half of the world’s GC-related deaths occur in this country [1]. Due to the inadequacy of nationwide screening programs for cancer, nearly 80% of GC cases are metastatic or locally advanced at the time of diagnosis [18]. Therefore, the prognosis of GC in China is poor despite the advancement of surgical technique. Postoperative chemotherapy improves the survival of advanced GC but also causes various adverse events, which result in poor quality of life and low treatment compliance. Dose reduction is consistently implemented when severe adverse events are reported, and overwhelming adverse events can even lead to discontinuation of chemotherapy. Myelosuppression is one of the most common chemotherapy-induced adverse events, characterized by anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Without appropriate treatment, myelosuppression will cause serious consequences [19]. Currently, the main treatments for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression include dose adjustment, blood transfusion, and recombinant human stimulating factors. However, these treatments can cause organ injuries and vascular events, and they can even contribute to cancer progression [20,21]. Chinese herbal medicine is one of the treatment strategies for myelosuppression and is widely used in China. The Shengbai decoction used in this study was composed of 10 kinds of herbal plants. In the formula, Radix Astragali, Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae, and Ganoderma Lucidumseu Sinensis mainly invigorate qi for consolidating superficies and strengthen immunity supplemented by Rhizoma Polygonati. Radix Angelicae Sinensis enriches the blood and alleviates anemia by promoting erythropoiesis. Caulis Spatholobi stimulates the production of platelets by the bone marrow. Fructus Ligustri Lucidi has the effect of promoting neutrophil proliferation. Radix Astragali and Fructus Psoraleae nourish Yin and Yang to achieve balance. Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae improves blood circulation and can activate hematopoietic stem cells. Those components were rationally assembled and integrated into SD for enhanced functions. Our results showed that the incidence and severity of myelosuppression were significantly reduced by Shengbai decoction. Patients in the SD group experienced significantly less neutropenia (P=0.0430), thrombocytopenia (P=0.0323), and anemia (P=0.0416) than the control group. As a result, the SD group obtained a significantly improved completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy than the control group, and fewer patients in the SD group underwent dose reduction (P=0.0468) or treatment discontinuation (P=0.0398). According to previous studies, the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for GC after radical resection [22,23]. Our results are consistent with the conclusions of these studies. Due to the improved treatment completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, the SD group had a better 3-year RFS (P=0.0369) and 3-year OS (P=0.0455) in this study. In terms of drug safety, no adverse events related to Shengbai decoction were reported. Our study has several limitations. First, bias in patient selection was inevitable for this non-randomized and retrospective study. Secondly, this study was performed at a single medical center in China with a limited sample size. Therefore, we are preparing a random clinical trial with a larger sample size to confirm the results of this study. Moreover, further basic research is needed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of Shengbai decoction on chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Shengbai decoction can effectively improve postoperative survival of patients with GC by alleviating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and improving the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy.
  23 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial.

Authors:  Ilfet Songun; Hein Putter; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Mitsuru Sasako; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael D'Angelica; Mithat Gonen; Murray F Brennan; Alan D Turnbull; Manjit Bains; Martin S Karpeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Colony-stimulating factor 1 potentiates lung cancer bone metastasis.

Authors:  Jaclyn Y Hung; Diane Horn; Kathleen Woodruff; Thomas Prihoda; Claude LeSaux; Jay Peters; Fermin Tio; Sherry L Abboud-Werner
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 5.  Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration to healthy individuals and persons with chronic neutropenia or cancer: an overview of safety considerations from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports project.

Authors:  C C Tigue; J M McKoy; A M Evens; S M Trifilio; M S Tallman; C L Bennett
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Olanzapine-Based Triple Regimens Versus Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist-Based Triple Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghan Zhang; Yaxiong Zhang; Gang Chen; Shaodong Hong; Yunpeng Yang; Wenfeng Fang; Fan Luo; Xi Chen; Yuxiang Ma; Yuanyuan Zhao; Jianhua Zhan; Cong Xue; Xue Hou; Ting Zhou; Shuxiang Ma; Fangfang Gao; Yan Huang; Likun Chen; Ningning Zhou; Hongyun Zhao; Li Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-12

7.  Time to initiation or duration of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy; which really impacts on survival in stage II and III gastric cancer?

Authors:  Kazumasa Fujitani; Yukinori Kurokawa; Atsushi Takeno; Shunji Endoh; Takeshi Ohmori; Junya Fujita; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Danggui Buxue Decoction, a Classical Formula of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fails to Prevent Myelosuppression in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jin Hong; Xiaosong Chen; Jiahui Huang; Chunqing Li; Li Zhong; Leying Chen; Jiayi Wu; Ou Huang; Jianrong He; Li Zhu; Weiguo Chen; Yafen Li; Hua Wan; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 9.  Oral Chinese Herbal Medicine as an Adjuvant Treatment for Chemotherapy, or Radiotherapy, Induced Myelosuppression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Bonan Hou; Rui Liu; Zhen Qin; Dan Luo; Qi Wang; Shuiqing Huang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Traditional Chinese Medicine Enhances Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer after Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Taiwan: A Nationwide Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wei-Tai Shih; Pei-Rung Yang; Yi-Chia Shen; Yao-Hsu Yang; Ching-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.