Literature DB >> 35184162

Across-population genomic prediction in grapevine opens up promising prospects for breeding.

Charlotte Brault1,2,3, Vincent Segura1,2, Patrice This1,2, Loïc Le Cunff1,2,3, Timothée Flutre4, Pierre François1,2, Thierry Pons1,2, Jean-Pierre Péros1,2, Agnès Doligez1,2.   

Abstract

Crop breeding involves two selection steps: choosing progenitors and selecting individuals within progenies. Genomic prediction, based on genome-wide marker estimation of genetic values, could facilitate these steps. However, its potential usefulness in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) has only been evaluated in non-breeding contexts mainly through cross-validation within a single population. We tested across-population genomic prediction in a more realistic breeding configuration, from a diversity panel to ten bi-parental crosses connected within a half-diallel mating design. Prediction quality was evaluated over 15 traits of interest (related to yield, berry composition, phenology and vigour), for both the average genetic value of each cross (cross mean) and the genetic values of individuals within each cross (individual values). Genomic prediction in these conditions was found useful: for cross mean, average per-trait predictive ability was 0.6, while per-cross predictive ability was halved on average, but reached a maximum of 0.7. Mean predictive ability for individual values within crosses was 0.26, about half the within-half-diallel value taken as a reference. For some traits and/or crosses, these across-population predictive ability values are promising for implementing genomic selection in grapevine breeding. This study also provided key insights on variables affecting predictive ability. Per-cross predictive ability was well predicted by genetic distance between parents and when this predictive ability was below 0.6, it was improved by training set optimization. For individual values, predictive ability mostly depended on trait-related variables (magnitude of the cross effect and heritability). These results will greatly help designing grapevine breeding programs assisted by genomic prediction.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  across-population; diversity panel; genomic prediction; grapevine; half-diallel; multi-parental population

Year:  2022        PMID: 35184162      PMCID: PMC9070645          DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hortic Res        ISSN: 2052-7276            Impact factor:   7.291


  31 in total

1.  Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple.

Authors:  Morgane Roth; Hélène Muranty; Mario Di Guardo; Walter Guerra; Andrea Patocchi; Fabrizio Costa
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  A novel high-density grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) integrated linkage map using GBS in a half-diallel population.

Authors:  Javier Tello; Catherine Roux; Hajar Chouiki; Valérie Laucou; Gautier Sarah; Audrey Weber; Sylvain Santoni; Timothée Flutre; Thierry Pons; Patrice This; Jean-Pierre Péros; Agnès Doligez
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genome-wide prediction methods in highly diverse and heterozygous species: proof-of-concept through simulation in grapevine.

Authors:  Agota Fodor; Vincent Segura; Marie Denis; Samuel Neuenschwander; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Philippe Chatelet; Félix Abdel Aziz Homa; Thierry Lacombe; Patrice This; Loic Le Cunff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.

Authors:  I M MacLeod; P J Bowman; C J Vander Jagt; M Haile-Mariam; K E Kemper; A J Chamberlain; C Schrooten; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Genomic selection of crossing partners on basis of the expected mean and variance of their derived lines.

Authors:  Tanja Osthushenrich; Matthias Frisch; Eva Herzog
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Disentangling group specific QTL allele effects from genetic background epistasis using admixed individuals in GWAS: An application to maize flowering.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Cyril Bauland; Carine Palaffre; Delphine Madur; Valérie Combes; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding.

Authors:  Christian R Werner; R Chris Gaynor; Gregor Gorjanc; John M Hickey; Tobias Kox; Amine Abbadi; Gunhild Leckband; Rod J Snowdon; Andreas Stahl
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Comparison of whole-genome prediction models for traits with contrasting genetic architecture in a diversity panel of maize inbred lines.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Accuracy and responses of genomic selection on key traits in apple breeding.

Authors:  Hélène Muranty; Michela Troggio; Inès Ben Sadok; Mehdi Al Rifaï; Annemarie Auwerkerken; Elisa Banchi; Riccardo Velasco; Piergiorgio Stevanato; W Eric van de Weg; Mario Di Guardo; Satish Kumar; François Laurens; Marco C A M Bink
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.793

View more
  2 in total

1.  A genome-wide association and prediction study in grapevine deciphers the genetic architecture of multiple traits and identifies genes under many new QTLs.

Authors:  Timothée Flutre; Loïc Le Cunff; Agota Fodor; Amandine Launay; Charles Romieu; Gilles Berger; Yves Bertrand; Nancy Terrier; Isabelle Beccavin; Virginie Bouckenooghe; Maryline Roques; Lucie Pinasseau; Arnaud Verbaere; Nicolas Sommerer; Véronique Cheynier; Roberto Bacilieri; Jean-Michel Boursiquot; Thierry Lacombe; Valérie Laucou; Patrice This; Jean-Pierre Péros; Agnès Doligez
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.542

2.  Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine.

Authors:  Charlotte Brault; Juliette Lazerges; Agnès Doligez; Miguel Thomas; Martin Ecarnot; Pierre Roumet; Yves Bertrand; Gilles Berger; Thierry Pons; Pierre François; Loïc Le Cunff; Patrice This; Vincent Segura
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.827

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.