Ahmed M Negm1, Jeremy Lee2, Radmehr Hamidian3, C Allyson Jones4, Rachel G Khadaroo5. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: anegm@ualberta.ca. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 3. Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 5. Department of Surgery and Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions in treatment of sarcopenia. The primary outcome was the measure of treatment effect on muscle mass, and secondary outcomes were the treatment effect on muscle strength and physical performance. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants with sarcopenia receiving interventions targeting sarcopenia in any setting. METHODS: Data sources: Relevant RCTs were identified by a systematic search of several electronic databases, including CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from January 1995 to July 2019. Duplicate title and abstract and full-text screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed. DATA EXTRACTION: All RCTs examining sarcopenia interventions [mixed exercise (combined aerobic and resistance exercise), aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, balance exercise, physical activity and protein or nutrition supplementation, acupuncture, whole-body vibration, protein supplement or interventions to increase protein intake, any nutritional intervention other than protein, and pharmacotherapy] were included. Comparators were standard care, placebo, or another intervention. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed Bayesian NMA; continuous outcome data were pooled using the standardized mean difference effect size. Interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 59 RCTs were included after screening of 4315 citations and 313 full-text articles. Network meta-analysis of muscle mass outcome (including 46 RCTs, 3649 participants, 11 interventions) suggested that mixed exercise were the most effective intervention (SUCRA = 93.94%) to increase muscle mass. Physical activity and protein or nutrition supplementation, and aerobic exercise were the most effective interventions to improve muscle strength and physical performance, respectively. Overall, mixed exercise is the most effective intervention in increasing muscle mass and was one of the 3 most effective interventions in increasing muscle strength and physical performance. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Mixed exercise and physical activity with nutritional supplementation are the most effective sarcopenia interventions. Most of the included studies have a high risk of bias. More robust RCTs are needed to increase the confidence of our NMA results and the quality of evidence.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions in treatment of sarcopenia. The primary outcome was the measure of treatment effect on muscle mass, and secondary outcomes were the treatment effect on muscle strength and physical performance. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants with sarcopenia receiving interventions targeting sarcopenia in any setting. METHODS: Data sources: Relevant RCTs were identified by a systematic search of several electronic databases, including CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from January 1995 to July 2019. Duplicate title and abstract and full-text screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed. DATA EXTRACTION: All RCTs examining sarcopenia interventions [mixed exercise (combined aerobic and resistance exercise), aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, balance exercise, physical activity and protein or nutrition supplementation, acupuncture, whole-body vibration, protein supplement or interventions to increase protein intake, any nutritional intervention other than protein, and pharmacotherapy] were included. Comparators were standard care, placebo, or another intervention. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed Bayesian NMA; continuous outcome data were pooled using the standardized mean difference effect size. Interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 59 RCTs were included after screening of 4315 citations and 313 full-text articles. Network meta-analysis of muscle mass outcome (including 46 RCTs, 3649 participants, 11 interventions) suggested that mixed exercise were the most effective intervention (SUCRA = 93.94%) to increase muscle mass. Physical activity and protein or nutrition supplementation, and aerobic exercise were the most effective interventions to improve muscle strength and physical performance, respectively. Overall, mixed exercise is the most effective intervention in increasing muscle mass and was one of the 3 most effective interventions in increasing muscle strength and physical performance. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Mixed exercise and physical activity with nutritional supplementation are the most effective sarcopenia interventions. Most of the included studies have a high risk of bias. More robust RCTs are needed to increase the confidence of our NMA results and the quality of evidence.
Authors: Lawrence P Cahalin; Magno F Formiga; Brady Anderson; Gerson Cipriano; Edgar D Hernandez; Johnny Owens; Luke Hughes Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-08-15 Impact factor: 4.755