| Literature DB >> 35183387 |
Yoshifumi Uwamino1, Takashi Yokoyama2, Takako Shimura3, Tomoyasu Nishimura4, Yasunori Sato5, Masatoshi Wakui6, Kenjiro Kosaki3, Naoki Hasegawa7, Mitsuru Murata6.
Abstract
The reduced vaccine efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 variant lineage B. 1.351 (beta variant) containing the E484K and N501Y mutations is well known. The E484K mutation in SARS-CoV-2 is thought to be responsible for weakened humoral immunity. Vaccine efficacy against the R.1 lineage, which contains the E484K mutation but not the N501Y mutation, is uncertain. Serum samples were collected from 100 healthy Japanese participants three weeks after receiving the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, and serum neutralization antibody titers were measured against five SARS-CoV-2 variants. The geometric mean neutralization titers measured for the original and R.1 lineages were equivalent (91.90 ± 2.40 and 102.67 ± 2.28, respectively), whereas a low titer was measured for the beta variant (18.03 ± 1.92). Although further investigations with other variant strains and serum samples are essential, our results imply that the weakened humoral response is not caused solely by the E484K mutation. (UMIN000043340).Entities:
Keywords: E484K mutation; Neutralization antibody; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine; Variant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35183387 PMCID: PMC8841208 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 4.169
Fig. 1Geometric means of neutralizing antibody titers for SARS-CoV-2 variants. Neutralizing antibody titers against the original SARS-CoV-2 (original), R.1 lineage (R.1), B. 1.1.7 strain (Alpha), B. 1.351 strain (Beta), and B. 1.617.2 (Delta) strains were measured using serum samples from 100 participants who received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Geometric means of neutralizing antibody titers were calculated. The neutralization antibody titer of samples without a neutralizing effect at 1:20 dilutions was treated as 10. Results are displayed as the logarithms of the geometric mean. Standard deviation and p-values of paired t-test are displayed.
Fig. 2Relationship between antibody titers measured by commercially available CLEIA based SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and neutralizing antibody titers for variants. Logarithm of neutralizing antibody titers against the original SARS-CoV-2 (original), R.1 lineage (R.1), B. 1.1.7 strain (Alpha), B. 1.351 strain (Beta), and B. 1.617.2 (Delta) strains was compared to the logarithm of anti-RBD IgG antibody measured by SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant reagents (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, USA). The neutralizing antibody titer of samples that did not exhibit the neutralization effect at 1:20 dilutions was treated as 10. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated.