| Literature DB >> 35183068 |
Louis Kim1, Minh Tung Do1, Hyuk Dal Jung1, Young Jae Im1, Kyu Chang Wang2, Ji Yeon Lee3, Kwanjin Park1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the role preoperative urodynamic study for asymptomatic closed spinal dysraphism as it has failed to reveal the benefit in surgical decision and expectation of urological outcomes. We explore the relationship between preoperative videourodynamic study and postoperative urological outcomes after toilet training completed, focusing on their capability of spontaneous voiding.Entities:
Keywords: Occult spinal dysraphism; Prophylactic surgery; Tethering; Toilet training; Urodynamics studies; Voiding characteristics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35183068 PMCID: PMC8984696 DOI: 10.5213/inj.2142246.123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Neurourol J ISSN: 2093-4777 Impact factor: 2.835
Fig. 1.Typical pattern of videourodynamic findings of vesicourethral synergy. Upper panel indicates synergy in 3 individual patients and lower panel indicates lack of synergy. Vesicourethral synergy typically shows funneling of bladder neck and active dilation of urethra whereas lack of synergy revealed failure of funneling of bladder neck and passive opening of urethra in the face of increasing vesical pressure. Sometimes, dyssynergic active closure of sphincter (arrow), characteristic of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia was seen.
Patient clinical characteristics and preoperative urodynamic findings
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Age at UDS (mo) | 5.6 ± 6.5 (0–40) |
| Age at SCU (mo) | 6.0 ± 8.0 (1–44) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 80 (44.2) |
| Female | 101 (55.8) |
| Diagnosis | |
| Lipoma | 149 (82.3) |
| Tethered cord syndrome | 32 (17.7) |
| Conus Level | |
| L2–3 | 33 (18.2) |
| L3–4 | 34 (18.8) |
| Below L5 | 114 (63) |
| Syringomyelia | |
| Present | 35 (19.3) |
| Absent | 146 (80.7) |
| Electromyography | |
| Normal | 158 (87.3) |
| Abnormal | 19 (10.5) |
| Incomplete | 4 (2.2) |
| Time to TT[ | 43.0 ± 17.2 (21–68) |
| Preoperative urodynamic findings | |
| Residual volume[ | |
| < 20% | 139 (76.8) |
| ≥20% | 42 (23.2) |
| Anal tone | |
| Competent | 139 (76.8) |
| Incompetent | 42 (23.2) |
| Bladder neck | |
| Closed | 104 (57.5) |
| Open | 77 (42.5) |
| Compliance | |
| ≥ 10 mL/cm H2O | 156 (86.2) |
| < 10 mL/cm H2O | 25 (13.8) |
| Vesicourethral synergy | |
| Synergic | 172 (95) |
| Lack of synergy | 9 (5) |
| Detrusor overactivity | |
| Yes | 25 (13.8) |
| No | 156 (86.2) |
| Small capacity[ | |
| Yes | 38 (21) |
| No | 143 (79) |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range) or number (%).
UDS, urodynamic study; SCU, spinal cord untethering.
TT, toilet training–under the name of tethered cord syndrome, 6 patients with dermal sinus, 3 patients with hemangioma, 7 patients with limited dorsal myeloschisis, 7 patients with low-lying conus, 3 patients with syringomyelia, 2 patients terminal myelocystocele and 4 patients with thickened filum terminale were included.
It was adjusted by estimated capacity for age.
It was defined as less than 70% of estimated age-adjusted capacity.
Fig. 2.Changing patients’ distribution of voiding status according to vesicourethral synergy. Evaluation was made at 2 time points of 6 months after spinal cord untethering and toilet training. Changes in voiding status was indicated with arrows. Void, spontaneous voiding; CIC, clean intermittent catheterization; SCU, spinal cord untethering; TT, toilet training.
Relationship between urodynamic parameter and voiding characteristics
| Parameter | Postoperative to 6 months | After toilet training | Urinary continence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous voiding | CIC | P-value | Spontaneous voiding | CIC | P-value | Continent | Incontinent | P-value | ||
| PVR (mL) | 0.26 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||
| < 20% | 99 (54.7) | 40 (22.1) | 124 (68.5) | 15 (8.3) | 117 (64.6) | 22 (12.2) | ||||
| ≥ 20% | 26 (14.4) | 16 (8.8) | 38 (21.0) | 4 (2.2) | 36 (19.9) | 6 (3.3) | ||||
| Anal tone | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.81 | |||||||
| Competent | 94 (51.9) | 45 (24.9) | 123 (68.0) | 16 (8.8) | 118 (65.2) | 21 (11.6) | ||||
| Incompetent | 31 (17.1) | 11 (6.1) | 39 (21.5) | 3 (1.7) | 35 (19.3) | 7 (3.9) | ||||
| Compliance | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.77 | |||||||
| ≥ 10 mL/cm H2O | 109 (60.2) | 47 (26.0) | 140 (77.3) | 16 (8.8) | 131 (72.4) | 25 (13.8) | ||||
| < 10 mL/cm H2O | 16 (8.8) | 9 (5.0) | 22 (12.2) | 3 (1.7) | 22 (12.2) | 3 (1.6) | ||||
| Bladder neck | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.68 | |||||||
| Closed | 74 (40.9) | 30 (16.6) | 91 (50.3) | 13 (7.2) | 89 (49.2) | 15 (8.3) | ||||
| Open | 51 (28.2) | 26 (14.3) | 71 (39.2) | 6 (3.3) | 64 (35.4) | 13 (7.1) | ||||
| Detrusor overactivity | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.55 | |||||||
| Normal | 108 (59.7) | 48 (26.5) | 139 (76.8) | 17 (9.4) | 133 (73.5) | 23 (12.7) | ||||
| Overactive | 17 (9.4) | 8 (4.4) | 23 (12.7) | 2 (1.1) | 20 (11.0) | 5 (2.8) | ||||
| Small capacity | 0.92 | 0.77 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Normal | 99 (54.7) | 44 (24.3) | 127 (70.2) | 16 (8.8) | 121 (66.9) | 22 (12.2) | ||||
| Small | 26 (14.4) | 12 (6.6) | 35 (19.3) | 3 (1.7) | 32 (17.7) | 6 (3.3) | ||||
| Vesicourethral synergy | 0.004 | 0.24 | 0.03 | |||||||
| Synergy | 123 (68.0) | 49 (27.1) | 155 (85.6) | 17 (9.4) | 148 (81.8) | 24 (13.3) | ||||
| Dyssynergy | 2 (1.1) | 7 (3.8) | 7 (3.9) | 2 (1.1) | 5 (2.8) | 4 (2.2) | ||||
Values are presented as number (%).
CIC, clean intermittent catheterization; PVR, postvoid residual urine.
Multivariate logistic regression of voiding characteristics and urinary continence
| Parameter | Spontaneous voiding | Urinary continence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postoperative to 6 months | After toilet training |
| ||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| PVR | 1.52 | (0.71–3.27) | 0.91 | (0.28–3.01) | 0.76 | (0.27–2.15) |
| Anal tone | 0.63 | (0.27–1.46) | 0.56 | (0.14–2.21) | 1.25 | (0.46–3.43) |
| Compliance | 1.28 | (0.49–3.35) | 1.51 | (0.36–6.27) | 0.58 | (0.15–2.27) |
| Bladder neck | 1.29 | (0.66–2.52) | 0.60 | (0.21–1.69) | 1.29 | (0.56–2.97) |
| Detrusor overactivity | 1.19 | (0.47–3.09) | 0.91 | (0.19–4.44) | 1.69 | (0.55–5.23) |
| Small capacity | 0.99 | (0.44–2.25) | 0.68 | (0.18–2.57) | 0.93 | (0.33–2.61) |
| Vesicourethral synergy | 8.81 | (1.74–44.59)[ | 2.41 | (0.44–13.2) | 6.07 | (1.44–25.5)* |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PVR, postvoid residual urine.
P<0.05, statistical significance.