Literature DB >> 35182233

DVPred: a disease-specific prediction tool for variant pathogenicity classification for hearing loss.

Fengxiao Bu1,2, Mingjun Zhong3,4, Qinyi Chen4, Yumei Wang5, Xia Zhao5, Qian Zhang3,4, Xiarong Li5, Kevin T Booth6, Hela Azaiez7, Yu Lu3,4, Jing Cheng3,4, Richard J H Smith8, Huijun Yuan9,10.   

Abstract

Numerous computational prediction tools have been introduced to estimate the functional impact of variants in the human genome based on evolutionary constraints and biochemical metrics. However, their implementation in diagnostic settings to classify variants faced challenges with accuracy and validity. Most existing tools are pan-genome and pan-diseases, which neglected gene- and disease-specific properties and limited the accessibility of curated data. As a proof-of-concept, we developed a disease-specific prediction tool named Deafness Variant deleteriousness Prediction tool (DVPred) that focused on the 157 genes reportedly causing genetic hearing loss (HL). DVPred applied the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) algorithm to the dataset consisting of expert-curated pathogenic and benign variants from a large in-house HL patient cohort and public databases. With the incorporation of variant-level and gene-level features, DVPred outperformed the existing universal tools. It boasts an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, and showed consistent performance (AUC = 0.985) in an independent assessment dataset. We further demonstrated that multiple gene-level metrics, including low complexity genomic regions and substitution intolerance scores, were the top features of the model. A comprehensive analysis of missense variants showed a gene-specific ratio of predicted deleterious and neutral variants, implying varied tolerance or intolerance to variation in different genes. DVPred explored the utility of disease-specific strategy in improving the deafness variant prediction tool. It can improve the prioritization of pathogenic variants among massive variants identified by high-throughput sequencing on HL genes. It also shed light on the development of variant prediction tools for other genetic disorders.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35182233     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-022-02440-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  42 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies.

Authors:  Chengliang Dong; Peng Wei; Xueqiu Jian; Richard Gibbs; Eric Boerwinkle; Kai Wang; Xiaoming Liu
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.

Authors:  Michael O Dorschner; Laura M Amendola; Emily H Turner; Peggy D Robertson; Brian H Shirts; Carlos J Gallego; Robin L Bennett; Kelly L Jones; Mari J Tokita; James T Bennett; Jerry H Kim; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; Daniel S Kim; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad; Arno G Motulsky; C Ronald Scott; Colin C Pritchard; Tom Walsh; Wylie Burke; Wendy H Raskind; Peter Byers; Fuki M Hisama; Deborah A Nickerson; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The human noncoding genome defined by genetic diversity.

Authors:  Julia di Iulio; Istvan Bartha; Emily H M Wong; Hung-Chun Yu; Victor Lavrenko; Dongchan Yang; Inkyung Jung; Michael A Hicks; Naisha Shah; Ewen F Kirkness; Martin M Fabani; William H Biggs; Bing Ren; J Craig Venter; Amalio Telenti
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

Authors:  Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels.

Authors:  Yongwook Choi; Gregory E Sims; Sean Murphy; Jason R Miller; Agnes P Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++.

Authors:  Eugene V Davydov; David L Goode; Marina Sirota; Gregory M Cooper; Arend Sidow; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  An expanded sequence context model broadly explains variability in polymorphism levels across the human genome.

Authors:  Varun Aggarwala; Benjamin F Voight
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Genetic variant pathogenicity prediction trained using disease-specific clinical sequencing data sets.

Authors:  Perry Evans; Chao Wu; Amanda Lindy; Dianalee A McKnight; Matthew Lebo; Mahdi Sarmady; Ahmad N Abou Tayoun
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Genomic Landscape and Mutational Signatures of Deafness-Associated Genes.

Authors:  Hela Azaiez; Kevin T Booth; Sean S Ephraim; Bradley Crone; Elizabeth A Black-Ziegelbein; Robert J Marini; A Eliot Shearer; Christina M Sloan-Heggen; Diana Kolbe; Thomas Casavant; Michael J Schnieders; Carla Nishimura; Terry Braun; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Computational approaches for predicting variant impact: An overview from resources, principles to applications.

Authors:  Ye Liu; William S B Yeung; Philip C N Chiu; Dandan Cao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  GenOtoScope: Towards automating ACMG classification of variants associated with congenital hearing loss.

Authors:  Damianos P Melidis; Christian Landgraf; Gunnar Schmidt; Anja Schöner-Heinisch; Sandra von Hardenberg; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Wolfgang Nejdl; Bernd Auber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.779

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.