| Literature DB >> 35182162 |
Danlei Wang1, Viktoria Schramm2, Jeroen Pool2, Eleni Pardali2, Annemarijn Brandenburg2, Ivonne M C M Rietjens2, Peter J Boogaard2.
Abstract
Alkyl-substituted PAHs may be present in certain petroleum-derived products and in the environment and may eventually end up in consumer products, such as foodstuffs, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Safety concerns over possible exposure to alkylated PAHs have emerged. Bioactivation is a prerequisite for the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of PAHs and has been extensively studied for non-substituted PAHs, while data on the bioactivation of alkyl-substituted PAHs are scarce. The present study investigated the effect of alkyl substitution on the CYP 450-mediated metabolism of phenanthrene and eight of its alkylated congeners by quantifying metabolite formation in rat and human liver microsomal incubations. Furthermore, the mutagenicity of four selected methylated phenanthrenes was compared to that of phenanthrene using the Ames test. The obtained results support the hypothesis that alkyl substitution shifts the oxidative metabolism from the aromatic ring to the alkyl side chain. Increasing the length of the alkyl chain reduced overall metabolism with metabolic conversion for 1-n-dodecyl-phenanthrene (C12) being negligible. 1- and 9-methyl-phenanthrene, in which the methyl group generates an additional bay region-like structural motif, showed mutagenicity toward Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA 100, whereas phenanthrene and also 2- and 3-methyl-phenanthrene, without such an additional bay region-like structural motif, tested negative. It is concluded that the position of the alkylation affects the metabolism and resulting mutagenicity of phenanthrene with the mutagenicity increasing in cases where the alkyl substituent creates an additional bay region-like structural motif, in spite of the extra possibilities for side chain oxidation.Entities:
Keywords: Alkylated phenanthrene; Human; Michaelis–Menten kinetics; Microsomes; Mutagenicity; Rat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35182162 PMCID: PMC8921064 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03239-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 5.153
Fig. 1Reported metabolites of phenanthrene formed in microsomal incubations by P450 enzymes of humans and rodents (Bao and Yang 1991; Chaturapit and Holder 1978; Jacob et al. 1996; Schober et al. 2010; Shou et al. 1994). *Indicates a peri position
The Michaelis–Menten parameters including K, Vmax and intrinsic clearance (Clint) calculated as Vmax/KM for formation of metabolites from alkyl-substituted phenanthrenes and phenanthrene in rat and human liver microsomal incubations (Fig. 2)
| Parent compound and Metabolites | Structure | Species | Clint ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,4-Dihydro-phenanthrene-diol RT = 2.13 min, |
| Human | 22.6 ± 12.7 | 61.5 ± 6.3 | 2.7 |
| Rat | 153.7 ± 72.4 | 10.3 ± 1.8 | 0.1 | ||
3,4-Dihydro-phenanthrene-diol RT = 2.24 min, | Human | 8.1 ± 3.5 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 0.7 | |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
9,10-Dihydro-phenanthene-diol RT = 3.28 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 84.2 ± 15.7 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 0.1 | ||
9,10-Dihydro-phenanthene-diol RT = 3.38 min, | Human | 32.4 ± 9.0 | 287.8 ± 17.1 | 8.9 | |
| Rat | 121.6 ± 29.1 | 529.2 ± 43.2 | 4.4 | ||
1,2-Dihydro-phenanthrene-diol RT = 3.57 min, |
| Human | 25.7 ± 12.6 | 152.5 ± 14.4 | 5.9 |
| Rat | 104.3 ± 26.3 | 79.3 ± 6.5 | 0.8 | ||
3-Phenanthrol RT = 6.02 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 103.4 ± 29.5 | 21.3 ± 2.0 | 0.2 | ||
1-Phenanthrol RT = 6.31 min, |
| Human | 21.3 ± 5.2 | 125.2 ± 5.4 | 5.9 |
| Rat | 83.6 ± 43.1 | 123.9 ± 19.2 | 1.5 | ||
4-Phenanthrol RT = 6.55 min, |
| Human | 188.1 ± 104.1 | 18.0 ± 3.9 | 0.1 |
| Rat | 145.3 ± 89.8 | 24.5 ± 5.5 | 0.2 | ||
Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 2.32 min, |
| Human | 430.8 ± 134.7 | 27.5 ± 4.6 | 0.1 |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 3.43 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 43.7 ± 19.0 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 0.1 | ||
Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 3.96 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 17.8 ± 6.7 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 0.3 | ||
Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.35 min, | Human | 25.1 ± 3.3 | 20.6 ± 0.5 | 0.8 | |
| Rat | 34.3 ± 12.9 | 16.1 ± 1.3 | 0.5 | ||
Dihydro-1-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.76 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 14.8 ± 4.4 | 14.0 ± 0.6 | 0.9 | ||
1-(Hydroxymethyl) phennathrene RT = 5.55 min, |
| Human | 30.5 ± 4.1 | 475.3 ± 13.2 | 15.6 |
| Rat | 37.4 ± 3.5 | 1926 ± 40.3 | 51.5 | ||
1-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.3 min, |
| Human | 107.5 ± 18.9 | 14.7 ± 0.8 | 0.1 |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
1-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.80 min, | Human | 22.7 ± 6.2 | 77.3 ± 3.9 | 3.4 | |
| Rat | 123.0 ± 22.4 | 33.1 ± 2.1 | 0.3 | ||
1-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.92 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 106.5 ± 21.5 | 24.0 ± 1.6 | 0.2 | ||
1-Methylphenanthrol RT = 7.00 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 93.4 ± 21.6 | 17.3 ± 1.2 | 0.2 | ||
1-Methylphenanthrol RT = 7.29 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 150.2 ± 37.6 | 9.0 ± 0.8 | 0.1 | ||
Dihydro-2-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 3.09 min, | Human | 35.9 ± 11.9 | 6.4 ± 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
Dihydro-2-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.26 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 135.8 ± 44.5 | 23.1 ± 2.7 | 0.2 | ||
Dihydro-2-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.42 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 95.9 ± 46.6 | 16.2 ± 2.5 | 0.2 | ||
Dihydro-2-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.99 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 141.7 ± 43.3 | 12..8 ± 1.4 | 0.1 | ||
2-(Hydroxymethyl)-phennathrene RT = 5.59 min, |
| Human | 21.6 ± 5.9 | 562.0 ± 27.5 | 26.0 |
| Rat | 25.8 ± 7.1 | 2174 ± 115.3 | 84.3 | ||
2-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.12 min, |
| Human | 4.9 ± 3.2 | 16.3 ± 0.8 | 3.3 |
| Rat | NA | 90.7 ± 3.8 | – | ||
2-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.98 min, | Human | ND | ND | - | |
| Rat | 15.6 ± 4.2 | 76.0 ± 3.1 | 4.9 | ||
2-Methylphenanthrol RT = 7.08 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 39.6 ± 13.3 | 11.2 ± 0.9 | 0.3 | ||
Dihydro-3-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.25 min, |
| Human | 100.8 ± 20.0 | 65.0 ± 4.1 | 0.6 |
| Rat | 312.5 ± 178.2 | 92.3 ± 25.1 | 0.3 | ||
Dihydro-3-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.42 min, | Human | 71.5 ± 16.2 | 12.8 ± 0.8 | 0.2 | |
| Rat | 121.5 ± 29.0 | 20.4 ± 1.7 | 0.2 | ||
3-(Hydroxymethyl)-phenanthrene RT = 5.62 min, |
| Human | 44.5 ± 6.2 | 583.8 ± 19.6 | 13.1 |
| Rat | 120.2 ± 41.7 | 2593 ± 305 | 21.6 | ||
3-Methylphennathrol RT = 6.98 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 371.1 ± 476.3 | 82.6 ± 53.8 | 0.2 | ||
3,4-Dihydro-9-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 2.98 min, |
| Human | 55.9 ± 23.9 | 26.1 ± 3.0 | 0.5 |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
1,2-Dihydro-9-methylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.27 min, |
| Human | 61.8 ± 33.7 | 15.6 ± 2.4 | 0.3 |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
9-(Hydroxymethyl)-phenanthrene RT = 5.6 min, |
| Human | 35.3 ± 16.3 | 415.9 ± 43.9 | 11.8 |
| Rat | 89.9 ± 42.9 | 1543 ± 226.6 | 17.2 | ||
9-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.28 min, |
| Human | 278.3 ± 145.8 | 27.8 ± 6.7 | 0.1 |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
9-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.73 min, | Human | 239.8 ± 235.5 | 44.9 ± 19.4 | 0.2 | |
| Rat | 226.2 ± 99.5 | 27.2 ± 5.1 | 0.1 | ||
9-Methylphenanthrol RT = 6.87 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 346.4 ± 164.3 | 124.2 ± 29.2 | 0.4 | ||
9-Methylphenanthrol RT = 7.2 min, 249.9 nm | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 445.7 ± 463.6 | 41.4 ± 23.4 | 0.1 | ||
9-Methylphenanthrol RT = 7.25 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 154.4 ± 78.6 | 10.2 ± 1.9 | 0.1 | ||
Dihydro-2-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.6 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 25.3 ± 23.2 | 33.9 ± 11.8 | 1.3 | ||
Dihydro-2-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 5.16 min, | Human | 108.3 ± 56.2 | 18.4 ± 3.2 | 0.2 | |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
Dihydro-2-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 5.29 min, | Human | 132.0 ± 49.6 | 22.1 ± 3.0 | 0.2 | |
| Rat | 181.7 ± 38.3 | 42.9 ± 3.5 | 0.2 | ||
2-(1-Hydroxyethyl)-phenanthrene RT = 6.21 min, |
| Human | 96.5 ± 31.7 | 468.8 ± 50.3 | 4.9 |
| Rat | 105.4 ± 27.4 | 3149.0 ± 266.1 | 29.9 | ||
2-Ethylphenanthrol RT = 7.57 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 223.6 ± 100.8 | 16.5 ± 3.1 | 0.1 | ||
2-Ethylphenanthrol RT = 7.74 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 233.3 ± 89.7 | 16.6 ± 2.7 | 0.1 | ||
2-Ethylphenanthrol RT = 7.89 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 133.2 ± 76.4 | 11.8 ± 2.4 | 0.1 | ||
| RT = 9.38 min, λ = 267.6 nm | Unknown | Human | 205.0 ± 85.7 | 37.2 ± 6.5 | 0.2 |
| Rat | 95.4 ± 30.5 | 238.0 ± 23.9 | 2.5 | ||
Dihydro-9-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 3.81 min, |
| Human | 104.6 ± 17.3 | 15.2 ± 0.8 | 0.1 |
| Rat | 117.7 ± 59.9 | 12.0 ± 2.1 | 0.1 | ||
Dihydro-9-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 3.88 min, | Human | 59.1 ± 12.4 | 23.5 ± 1.4 | 0.4 | |
| Rat | ND | ND | – | ||
9-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-phenanthrene RT = 6.00 min, |
| Human | 22.6 ± 6.4 | 61.4 ± 3.3 | 2.7 |
| Rat | 72.9 ± 15.2 | 37.0 ± 2.26 | 0.5 | ||
9-(1-Hydroxyethyl)-phenanthrene RT = 6.20 min, |
| Human | 122.2 ± 22.5 | 267.7 ± 17.4 | 2.2 |
| Rat | 138.2 ± 15.2 | 1206 ± 47.9 | 8.7 | ||
9-Ethylphenanthrol RT = 7.42 min, |
| Human | 159.9 ± 34.9 | 12.8 ± 1.1 | 0.1 |
| Rat | 91.6 ± 30.2 | 29.7 ± 3.1 | 0.3 | ||
9-Ethylphenanthrol RT = 7.58 min, | Human | 244.7 ± 52.6 | 29.1 ± 2.8 | 0.1 | |
| Rat | 321.4 ± 70.5 | 56.6 ± 1.8 | 0.2 | ||
9-Ethylphenanthrol RT = 7.93 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 90.3 ± 23.1 | 22.8 ± 1.8 | 0.3 | ||
| RT = 9.35 min, | Unknown | Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 169.0 ± 51.7 | 52.7 ± 6.2 | 0.3 | ||
Dihydro-10-methyl-9-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.29 min, |
| Human | 141.8 ± 83.7 | 7.2 ± 1.7 | 0.1 |
| Rat | 253.1 ± 223.1 | 6.4 ± 2.7 | 0.0 | ||
Dihydro-10-methyl-9-ethylphenanthrene-diol RT = 4.34 min, | Human | 102.1 ± 70.3 | 10.5 ± 2.5 | 0.1 | |
| Rat | 73.7 ± 45.0 | 8.09 ± 1.6 | 0.1 | ||
9-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-10-methylphenanthrene RT = 6.5 min, |
| Human | 24.7 ± 16.5 | 12.9 ± 1.8 | 0.5 |
| Rat | 88.4 ± 39.2 | 21.0 ± 3.1 | 0.2 | ||
9-(1-Hydroxyethyl)-10-methylphenanthrene RT = 6.65 min, |
| Human | 192.4 ± 106.8 | 187.1 ± 45.2 | 1.0 |
| Rat | 114.3 ± 4.5 | 630.2 ± 81.4 | 5.5 | ||
9-Ethyl-10-(1-hydroxymethyl)-phenanthrene RT = 6.90 min, |
| Human | 118.2 ± 65.0 | 85.9 ± 17.4 | 0.7 |
| Rat | 98.9 ± 38.5 | 85.8 ± 11.6 | 0.9 | ||
9-Ethyl-10-methylphenanthrol RT = 7.82 min, |
| Human | ND | ND | – |
| Rat | 94.4 ± 41.4 | 65.6 ± 9.8 | 0.7 | ||
9-Ethyl-10-methylphenanthrol RT = 8.3 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 219.8 ± 126.8 | 29.4 ± 7.7 | 0.1 | ||
1-Hydroxyhexyl-phenanthrene RT = 8.45 min, |
| Human | 67.9 ± 20.0 | 48.3 ± 6.1 | 0.7 |
| Rat | 35.8 ± 18.1 | 103.4 ± 18.1 | 2.9 | ||
1-Hydroxyhexyl-phenanthrene RT = 8.58 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 42.2 ± 10.9 | 54.8 ± 5.2 | 1.3 | ||
1-Hydroxyhexyl-phenanthrene RT = 8.82 min, | Human | 51.7 ± 14.2 | 44.2 ± 4.8 | 0.9 | |
| Rat | 26.6 ± 6.0 | 25.6 ± 1.8 | 1.0 | ||
1-Hydroxyhexyl-phenanthrene RT = 9.13 min, | Human | ND | ND | – | |
| Rat | 33.1 ± 7.3 | 11.7 ± 0.9 | 0.4 | ||
| NM | NA | Human | NA | NA | NA |
| Rat | NA | NA | NA | ||
The retention time (RT) and wavelength (λ) used to identify and quantify the metabolites by UPLC–UV analysis are also presented. Results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from three independent microsomal incubations
ND not detected, NM no metabolism, NA not applicable
Fig. 2Substrate concentration-dependent metabolism of alkyl-substituted phenanthrenes and phenanthrene itself by RLM and HLM. Green lines represent metabolite formation via alkyl chain oxidation and black lines present metabolite formation by aromatic ring oxidation. Each symbol represents experimental means and vertical bars are standard errors of the mean (n = 3) (color figure online)
Fig. 3Intrinsic clearance via aromatic ring and alkyl chain oxidation by a RLM and b HLM for the different model compounds. Dashed bars represent aromatic ring oxidation; white bars represent alkyl chain oxidation. Abbreviation. PHE = phenanthrene
Fig. 4Relationship between total Clint of alkylated phenanthrenes and the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl side chain in metabolism with a RLM and b HLM. The intrinsic clearance was calculated by adding up the Clint values of all metabolites for the respective model compound (Table 1)
Fig. 5Number of revertants in S. typhimurium TA98 upon exposure to a phenanthrene, b 1-methylphenanthrene, c 2-methylphenanthrene, d 3-methylphenanthrene and e 9-methylphenanthrene in absence (black bar) and presence (white bar) of 5% S9-mix. Bars represent means and vertical bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). The dotted horizontal line indicates threefold increase that is considered the threshold for concluding on the positive outcome for mutagenicity. In the absence of S9 mix, the test doses of 3-methyl-phenanthrene showed cytotoxicity so no data are presented. The results of at least four analyzable doses that were non-cytotoxic are presented in Table S2 in the supplementary material 1 showing negative results. PC positive control, 1 µg/plate 2AA with S9-mix and 10 µg/plate NF without S9-mix. SC solvent control, DMSO with and without S9-mix
Fig. 6Number of revertants in S. typhimurium TA100 upon exposure to a phenanthrene b 1-methylphenanthrene, c 2-methylphenanthrene, d 3-methylphenanthrene and e 9-methylphenanthrene in the absence (black bar) and presence (white bar) of 5% S9-mix. The dotted horizontal line indicates twofold increase that is considered the threshold for concluding on the positive outcome for mutagenicity. Bar represents means and vertical bars are standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). In the absence of the S9 mix, the test doses of 2-methylphenanthrene, 3-methylphenanthrene and 9-methylphenanthrene showed cytotoxicity so no data are presented. The results of at least four analyzable doses that were non-cytotoxic are presented in Table S3 in the supplementary material 1 showing negative results. PC positive control, 5 µg/plate 2AA with S9-mix and 650 µg/plate MMS without S9-mix. SC solvent control, DMSO with and without S9-mix
Fig. 7Concentration of the metabolites formed in S9 incubation with phenanthrene and four of its methyl-substituted analogs. Each bar represents experimental means and vertical bars are standard errors of the mean (n = 3)
Fig. 8Possible metabolic pathway toward bay region dihydrodiol-epoxide formation for 1-methyl- (R1=CH3) and 9-methyl- (R2=CH3) phenanthrene