Literature DB >> 35181817

Combined Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin, Fibrinogen, and Albumin (MF-A) Is a Novel Prognostic Marker in Patients with Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Linlin Liang1, Fangfang Liu1, Wenlei Yang1, Wei Yang2, Lei Chen2, Yu He3, Zhen Liu1, Liqun Zhang2, Fan Zhang2, Fen Cai2, Huawen Xu2, Miaoping Lin2, Mengfei Liu1, Yaqi Pan1, Ying Liu1, Zhe Hu1, Huanyu Chen1, Zhonghu He4, Yang Ke5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to systematically select blood markers routinely tested in clinical settings, which are independently associated with overall survival (OS) and are able to stratify prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing esophagectomy.
METHODS: We selected optimal blood markers for prognostic stratification from 60 candidates in a clinical cohort of 1819 consecutive patients with resectable ESCC in China. Selection was carried out using two-step multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for multifaceted confounders. A composite index was developed by multiplying risk factors and dividing them by protective factors.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 48.07 months, 641 deaths occurred in the 1819 patients and the 5-year OS was 56.30%. Two risk factors (mean corpuscular hemoglobin, fibrinogen) and a protective factor (albumin), all dichotomized and assigned values 1 and 2, were used to construct the composite index marker "MF-A". Three risk groups were created based on the MF-A score including low- (0.5), moderate- (1), and high-risk groups (2 and 4). Compared with patients in the low-risk group (1184/1778, 66.59%), those in the moderate- (488, 27.45%), and high-risk (106, 5.96%) groups were at elevated risk of death (adjusted HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11-1.57; adjusted HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.56-2.75; Ptrend < 10-7). Within each TNM stage grouping, OS also trended to be significantly worse as the MF-A score increased.
CONCLUSIONS: "MF-A" is a novel independent predictor which may be used to estimate and stratify prognosis for ESCC patients undergoing esophagectomy.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35181817     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11415-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  4 in total

1.  [Mortality and survival analysis of esophageal cancer in China].

Authors:  S W Zhang; R S Zheng; T T Zuo; H M Zeng; W Q Chen; J He
Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi       Date:  2016-09-23

2.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Response to: Comment on "Is adjuvant therapy a better option for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with esophagectomy? A prognosis prediction model based on multicenter real-world data".

Authors:  Zhonghu He; Fangfang Liu; Wenlei Yang; Yang Ke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The usefulness of the serum transferrin receptor in detecting iron deficiency in the anemia of chronic disorders.

Authors:  J Juncà; F Fernández-Avilés; A Oriol; J T Navarro; F Millá; J M Sancho; E Feliu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.941

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.