Literature DB >> 35179572

YeastMate: Neural network-assisted segmentation of mating and budding events in S. cerevisiae.

David Bunk1, Julian Moriasy1, Felix Thoma1, Christopher Jakubke1, Christof Osman1, David Hörl1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Here, we introduce YeastMate, a user-friendly deep learning-based application for automated detection and segmentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells and their mating and budding events in microscopy images. We build upon Mask R-CNN with a custom segmentation head for the subclassification of mother and daughter cells during lifecycle transitions. YeastMate can be used directly as a Python library or through a stand-alone GUI application and a Fiji plugin as easy to use frontends.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for YeastMate is freely available at https://github.com/hoerlteam/YeastMate under the MIT license. We offer installers for our software stack for Windows, macOS and Linux. A detailed user guide is available at https://yeastmate.readthedocs.io. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35179572      PMCID: PMC9048668          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.931


1 Introduction

An important experimental approach when working with the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is to examine the effects of mutations on morphological features or protein localization either by brightfield or fluorescent microscopy (Ohya ). Such experiments can also be performed in a systematic manner by combining automated microscopy with strain libraries comprising thousands of yeast strains that carry gene deletions or express fluorescently tagged proteins (Giaever ; Huh ; Weill ), which, however, calls for robust automated image analysis pipelines. In recent years, tools based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become state-of-the-art for many tasks in biomedical image analysis (von Chamier ), including segmentation of individual S.cerevisiae cells (Dietler ; Lu ; Salem ). Many experimental strategies facilitated by the yeast system also make use of specific transitions in the yeast lifecycle like budding and mating to study things like organelle inheritance and mitochondrial quality control (Jakubke ; Rafelski ). Detection of matings and buddings is often done by hand or through dedicated postprocessing routines on the output of a single-cell segmentation tool (e.g. tracking of cells in a time series of images), highlighting the need for easy-to-use end-to-end solutions for these more complex tasks. Here, we present YeastMate, a novel deep learning-based tool for end-to-end segmentation of single cells and detection of transitions in the lifecycle of S.cerevisiae in single transmitted light images. YeastMate performs three tasks: instance segmentation of single cells, object detection of zygotes and budding events and automatic assignment of mother and daughter cells involved in a mating or budding event. The detection backend is based on Mask R-CNN (He ) and is complemented by a user-friendly frontend using modern web technologies as well as a Fiji plugin. In the task of detecting mating and budding events, we achieve accuracies comparable to manual human reannotation and we can also perform single-cell segmentation robustly across various datasets. YeastMate is already being used in ongoing research in our lab (Jakubke ). In addition to the software, we also provide a new dataset of images with manually annotated cells and mating and budding events.

2 Materials and methods

CNN architecture and training: Our network architecture builds upon Mask R-CNN with a modified mask segmentation head producing multiclass semantic segmentations (Supplementary Fig. S1) for each detected object. Instead of individually detecting mother and daughter cells, we first detect the whole mating and budding events as well as single cells. In a postprocessing step, we resolve the roles of the cells involved in budding or mating events based on the multiclass segmentation masks (Supplementary Fig. S2). We used 80% of our images for training our network and cross-validation and 20% as a hold-out test set for the final performance assessment. Software architecture: YeastMate is implemented in a modular way: the detection backend can be used as a Python library but also runs as a webservice to provide its capabilities to client applications. As clients, we provide a Fiji plugin that directly interfaces with the server via HTTP requests as well as a standalone GUI Desktop application (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs S3–S5). We provide the whole YeastMate stack as a single installable file for use on a local workstation.
Fig. 1.

(A) Main components and output of YeastMate: We perform instance segmentation of single cells and detection of lifecycle transitions using a modified Mask R-CNN (middle), which can either be used directly from Python code or via two GUI frontends (left) to provide instance segmentation of single cells as well as detection of budding events and mating events with identification of the mother (M) and daughter (D) cells involved in the event (right). (B) Precision–recall (PR) curves of YeastMate performance for detection of mating and budding events in our test dataset. Human precision and recall during reannotation by three different authors are plotted as colored stars. (C) Single-cell detection performance (F1 score) and segmentation performance (mean intersection-over-union of true positive detections) of YeastNet, YeastSpotter, YeaZ and YeastMate on our own test dataset as well as datasets from Dietler and Salem . The values in the table are mean ± standard deviation across all images in a dataset

(A) Main components and output of YeastMate: We perform instance segmentation of single cells and detection of lifecycle transitions using a modified Mask R-CNN (middle), which can either be used directly from Python code or via two GUI frontends (left) to provide instance segmentation of single cells as well as detection of budding events and mating events with identification of the mother (M) and daughter (D) cells involved in the event (right). (B) Precision–recall (PR) curves of YeastMate performance for detection of mating and budding events in our test dataset. Human precision and recall during reannotation by three different authors are plotted as colored stars. (C) Single-cell detection performance (F1 score) and segmentation performance (mean intersection-over-union of true positive detections) of YeastNet, YeastSpotter, YeaZ and YeastMate on our own test dataset as well as datasets from Dietler and Salem . The values in the table are mean ± standard deviation across all images in a dataset For more details, please refer to the Supplementary Methods.

3 Results

Dataset: For training YeastMate, we collected 147 brightfield and differential interference contrast (DIC) images of S.cerevisiae acquired on two different microscopes at various imaging conditions and generated curated single-cell segmentation masks and mating and budding annotations. In total, our data contain 17 058 individual cells, 3615 buddings and 2380 zygotes (Supplementary Table S1). Object detection performance: Our network achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.878 as well as favourable APs for the individual classes of objects when applied to our test set (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S6). We also assessed interhuman reproducibility by comparing the annotations for mating and budding events of four different annotators (with the most experienced one chosen as the reference). On our test dataset, mean interhuman precision and recall are (0.908, 0.946) for mating events and (0.774, 0.763) for budding events. These values lie close to the PR-curves of our network, indicating that YeastMate can achieve object detection performance comparable to manual human annotation. Single-cell segmentation performance: YeastMate also compares favourably to existing CNN-based solutions in single-cell segmentation, showing consistent performance not only on our own test dataset, but also two publicly available datasets (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Results, Supplementary Fig. S7 and Table S2). Based on the robust Mask R-CNN architecture, YeastMate achieves the highest single-cell detection performance of all tools as well as competitive results in segmentation.

4 Conclusion

With YeastMate, we introduce an easy-to-use application to not only perform single-cell segmentation in images of S.cerevisiae with high robustness across datasets, but also detect transitions in the cell cycle in single images with accuracies comparable to human annotation. YeastMate is implemented in a modular way and can be run on local workstations but the detection server can also be run on a remote compute server. Additionally, we provide two user-friendly frontends to make the tool available without the need to write code. We can envision YeastMate to be expanded to detect other life cycle states, such as meiotic asci, similar to existing work in Arabidopsis thaliana (Lim ). YeastMate can provide a considerable improvement to high-throughput studies of yeast, facilitating not only the automated analysis of large image datasets of single cells, but also enabling the study the complex interplay of cellular components during both sexual and asexual reproduction of S.cerevisiae. Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

1.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast.

Authors:  Won-Ki Huh; James V Falvo; Luke C Gerke; Adam S Carroll; Russell W Howson; Jonathan S Weissman; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence for microscopy: what you should know.

Authors:  Lucas von Chamier; Romain F Laine; Ricardo Henriques
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.407

3.  DeepTetrad: high-throughput image analysis of meiotic tetrads by deep learning in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Eun-Cheon Lim; Jaeil Kim; Jihye Park; Eun-Jung Kim; Juhyun Kim; Yeong Mi Park; Hyun Seob Cho; Dohwan Byun; Ian R Henderson; Gregory P Copenhaver; Ildoo Hwang; Kyuha Choi
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  Guri Giaever; Angela M Chu; Li Ni; Carla Connelly; Linda Riles; Steeve Véronneau; Sally Dow; Ankuta Lucau-Danila; Keith Anderson; Bruno André; Adam P Arkin; Anna Astromoff; Mohamed El-Bakkoury; Rhonda Bangham; Rocio Benito; Sophie Brachat; Stefano Campanaro; Matt Curtiss; Karen Davis; Adam Deutschbauer; Karl-Dieter Entian; Patrick Flaherty; Francoise Foury; David J Garfinkel; Mark Gerstein; Deanna Gotte; Ulrich Güldener; Johannes H Hegemann; Svenja Hempel; Zelek Herman; Daniel F Jaramillo; Diane E Kelly; Steven L Kelly; Peter Kötter; Darlene LaBonte; David C Lamb; Ning Lan; Hong Liang; Hong Liao; Lucy Liu; Chuanyun Luo; Marc Lussier; Rong Mao; Patrice Menard; Siew Loon Ooi; Jose L Revuelta; Christopher J Roberts; Matthias Rose; Petra Ross-Macdonald; Bart Scherens; Greg Schimmack; Brenda Shafer; Daniel D Shoemaker; Sharon Sookhai-Mahadeo; Reginald K Storms; Jeffrey N Strathern; Giorgio Valle; Marleen Voet; Guido Volckaert; Ching-yun Wang; Teresa R Ward; Julie Wilhelmy; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Yonghong Yang; Grace Yen; Elaine Youngman; Kexin Yu; Howard Bussey; Jef D Boeke; Michael Snyder; Peter Philippsen; Ronald W Davis; Mark Johnston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mitochondrial network size scaling in budding yeast.

Authors:  Susanne M Rafelski; Matheus P Viana; Yi Zhang; Yee-Hung M Chan; Kurt S Thorn; Phoebe Yam; Jennifer C Fung; Hao Li; Luciano da F Costa; Wallace F Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genome-wide SWAp-Tag yeast libraries for proteome exploration.

Authors:  Uri Weill; Ido Yofe; Ehud Sass; Bram Stynen; Dan Davidi; Janani Natarajan; Reut Ben-Menachem; Zohar Avihou; Omer Goldman; Nofar Harpaz; Silvia Chuartzman; Kiril Kniazev; Barbara Knoblach; Janina Laborenz; Felix Boos; Jacqueline Kowarzyk; Shifra Ben-Dor; Einat Zalckvar; Johannes M Herrmann; Richard A Rachubinski; Ophry Pines; Doron Rapaport; Stephen W Michnick; Emmanuel D Levy; Maya Schuldiner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  YeastSpotter: accurate and parameter-free web segmentation for microscopy images of yeast cells.

Authors:  Alex X Lu; Taraneh Zarin; Ian S Hsu; Alan M Moses
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  A convolutional neural network segments yeast microscopy images with high accuracy.

Authors:  Nicola Dietler; Matthias Minder; Vojislav Gligorovski; Augoustina Maria Economou; Denis Alain Henri Lucien Joly; Ahmad Sadeghi; Chun Hei Michael Chan; Mateusz Koziński; Martin Weigert; Anne-Florence Bitbol; Sahand Jamal Rahi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Cristae-dependent quality control of the mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Christopher Jakubke; Rodaria Roussou; Andreas Maiser; Christina Schug; Felix Thoma; David Bunk; David Hörl; Heinrich Leonhardt; Peter Walter; Till Klecker; Christof Osman
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 10.  Single-cell phenomics in budding yeast.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Ohya; Yoshitaka Kimori; Hiroki Okada; Shinsuke Ohnuki
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.138

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Segmentation, tracking and cell cycle analysis of live-cell imaging data with Cell-ACDC.

Authors:  Francesco Padovani; Benedikt Mairhörmann; Pascal Falter-Braun; Jette Lengefeld; Kurt M Schmoller
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 7.364

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.