Mitra Lal1, Ellen Wachtel2, Mordechai Sheves3, Guy Patchornik1. 1. The Department of Chemical Sciences, Ariel University, 70400 Ariel, Israel. 2. Faculty of Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel. 3. Department of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel.
Abstract
In the decades'-long quest for high-quality membrane protein (MP) crystals, non-ionic detergent micelles have primarily served as a passive shield against protein aggregation in aqueous solution and/or as a conformation stabilizing environment. We have focused on exploiting the physical chemistry of detergent micelles in order to direct intrinsic MP/detergent complexes to assemble via conjugation under ambient conditions, thereby permitting finely tuned control over the micelle cloud point. In the current work, three commercially available amphiphilic, bipyridine chelators in combination with Fe2+ or Ni2+ were tested for their ability to conjugate non-ionic detergent micelles both in the presence and absence of an encapsulated bacteriorhodopsin molecule. Water-soluble chelators were added, and results were monitored with light microscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS). [Bipyridine:metal] complexes produced micellar conjugates, which appeared as oil-rich globules (10-200 μm) under a light microscope. DLS analysis demonstrated that micellar conjugation is complete 20 min after the introduction of the amphiphilic complex, and that the conjugation process can be fully or partially reversed with water-soluble chelators. This process of controlled conjugation/deconjugation under nondenaturing conditions provides broader flexibility in the choice of detergent for intrinsic MP purification and conformational flexibility during the crystallization procedure.
In the decades'-long quest for high-quality membrane protein (MP) crystals, non-ionic detergent micelles have primarily served as a passive shield against protein aggregation in aqueous solution and/or as a conformation stabilizing environment. We have focused on exploiting the physical chemistry of detergent micelles in order to direct intrinsic MP/detergent complexes to assemble via conjugation under ambient conditions, thereby permitting finely tuned control over the micelle cloud point. In the current work, three commercially available amphiphilic, bipyridine chelators in combination with Fe2+ or Ni2+ were tested for their ability to conjugate non-ionic detergent micelles both in the presence and absence of an encapsulated bacteriorhodopsin molecule. Water-soluble chelators were added, and results were monitored with light microscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS). [Bipyridine:metal] complexes produced micellar conjugates, which appeared as oil-rich globules (10-200 μm) under a light microscope. DLS analysis demonstrated that micellar conjugation is complete 20 min after the introduction of the amphiphilic complex, and that the conjugation process can be fully or partially reversed with water-soluble chelators. This process of controlled conjugation/deconjugation under nondenaturing conditions provides broader flexibility in the choice of detergent for intrinsic MP purification and conformational flexibility during the crystallization procedure.
Detergent
micelles are dynamic structures.[1−5] Whereas dilute aqueous micellar suspensions may be
regarded as ideal solutions in which micelles do not interact,[6] physical and/or chemical changes in the micellar
environment can promote their interactions: (a) inclusion of polymeric
precipitants; (b) increase in ionic strength; or (c) change in temperature.[1,6] Initially isotropic and transparent solutions become turbid, that
is, the cloud point is reached, beyond which phase separation into
a detergent-rich phase and a detergent-poor phase occurs.[1,6,7] Such phase separation has been
exploited for intrinsic membrane protein (MP) purification.[8−10] MPs partition spontaneously into the detergent-rich phase, whereas
more hydrophilic proteins are rejected.[8,9] Thus, partial
purification of MPs from water-soluble and/or more polar proteins
is achieved, and the contaminating background present in MP preparations
can be removed. Protein purification relies on detergents capable
of reaching cloud point conditions at temperatures that preserve the
native conformation of the target MP. To date, this has been achieved
primarily with the non-ionic surfactant Triton X-114 (cloud point
22–23 °C).[8−10] Similar considerations direct MP crystallization
protocols.[11]In order to increase
the number of detergents beyond those already
in use for MP purification, we have developed[12,13] a micelle conjugation mechanism, which efficiently promotes phase
separation at or near room temperature, irrespective of the detergent
cloud point (Figure A). Here, we explore the behavior of amphiphilic chelators belonging
to the bipyridine family: [4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-dipyridyl
(DP-nonyl), 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dipyridyl
(DP-tert-butyl), and 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-dipyridyl
(DP-methyl)] (Figure B). Since bipyridines are known to bind metal ions with lower affinity[14] than the previously described chelators—bathophenanthroline
or phenanthroline derivatives,[15] the current
report raises the possibility of reversing micellar conjugation, either
partially or completely, by competition with water-soluble chelators,
histidine or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), respectively.
The advantages of such conjugation reversal are twofold: (1) having
removed the contaminating background of hydrophilic proteins, and
(2) the purified MP/detergent complexes experience additional structural
flexibility that could be expected to aid in the growth of well-ordered
MP crystal nuclei.
Figure 1
(A) Cartoon of micelle conjugation via amphiphilic metal:chelator
complexes generated at the micelle/water interface. Upon addition
of EDTA, a strong, water-soluble chelator, the micelle aggregates
disassociate. (B) Chemical structures of amphiphilic dipyridine (DP)
chelators.
(A) Cartoon of micelle conjugation via amphiphilic metal:chelator
complexes generated at the micelle/water interface. Upon addition
of EDTA, a strong, water-soluble chelator, the micelle aggregates
disassociate. (B) Chemical structures of amphiphilic dipyridine (DP)
chelators.
Materials and Methods
Decyl β-d-maltoside (DM), octyl β-d-glucopyranoside (OG), octyl β-d-1-thioglucopyranoside
(OTG), tetraethylene glycol monooctyl ether (C8E4), EDTA, l-histidine, NaCl, FeSO4, and NiCl2 were obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Conjugation of OG, OTG,
C8E4, and DM Micelles Using the [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] Red Complex
Micellar conjugation
required mixing equal volumes of solution A and solution B. Solution
A was prepared by the addition of 3 μL of 15 mM DP-nonyl (in
EtOH) into 6.25 μL of 200 mM OG [in double distilled water (DDW)]
with vigorous vortexing for 20 s. DDW (16 μL) was then added
to reach a final volume of 25 μL. Equal volumes of Solution
A and Solution B (20 mM FeSO4 in DDW) were vortexed for
30 s. Aliquots (e.g., 4 μL) were transferred to siliconized
coverslides and incubated at 19 °C over a reservoir (0.5 mL)
containing 1 M NaCl in VDX crystallization plates (from Hampton Research).
When OTG, C8E4, or DM micelles were studied, 3 μL of 15 mM DP-nonyl
was added into 10 μL of either: 100 mM OTG, 100 mM C8E4, or
200 mM DM (all in DDW) with vigorous vortexing for 20 s, and DDW (12
μL) was added to reach a final volume of 25 μL. Here as
well, equal volumes of Solutions A and B were mixed, and 4 μL
of aliquots was placed for analysis as mentioned above.
Conjugation
of OG, OTG, C8E4, and DM Micelles Using the [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Fe2+] Red Complex
The protocol
used here was identical to that of the [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] complex except for the addition of 1 μL
of 130 mM DP-tert-butyl (in EtOH) into 6.25 μL
of either 200 mM OG or into 10 μL of 100 mM OTG, 100 mM C8E4,
or 200 mM DM (all in DDW) and further addition of DDW to a final volume
of 25 μL after vigorous vortexing.
Conjugation of OG, OTG,
C8E4, and DM Micelles Using the [(DP-methyl)3:Fe2+] Red Complex
The protocol used here
was the same as described for the [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] complex except for the addition of 3 μL of 15 mM DP-methyl
(in EtOH) into 6.25 μL of either 200 mM OG or into 10 μL
of 100 mM OTG, 100 mM C8E4, or 200 mM DM (all in DDW) and addition
of DDW to a final volume of 25 μL after vigorous vortexing.
Conjugation of OG, OTG, C8E4, and DM Micelles Using the [(Bipyridine)3:Ni2+] Complexes
Conjugation was performed
via the same protocols as described above except for replacing the
20 mM FeSO4 solution with 20 mM NiCl2 solution
(both in DDW).
Conjugation of Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) in
OTG Micelles Using
the [(DP-nonyl-butyl)3:Ni2+], [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Ni2+], or the [(DP-methyl)3:Ni2+] Amphiphilic Complexes
Cells of Halobacterium salinarum were grown, as previously
described,[16] and bR purple membrane fragments
were isolated from washed cells, according to an established procedure.[17] bR is a small integral MP (26 kDa) containing
a retinal chromophore covalently bound via a protonated Schiff base
to Lys216. The protein utilizes light energy for the active transport
of protons from the cytosol to the extracellular side of the membrane
and uses the generated proton gradient for the synthesis of ATP by
ATP synthase. bR was extracted from purple membranes with OTG, as
described previously.[18] To freshly extracted
bR (10.5 μL of 3–5 mg/mL bR), 0.5 μL of 27 mM DP-nonyl
or DP-tert-butyl or DP-methyl (in EtOH) was added
with vigorous stirring (for 20 s) and followed by the addition of
2.5 μL of 5.4 mM NiCl2 (in DDW). Aliquots (4 μL)
from the latter mixture were transferred to siliconized coverslides
and incubated overnight at 19 °C in the dark against a reservoir
(0.5 mL) containing 0.5 M NaCl in VDX crystallization plates (from
Hampton Research).
Addition of Water-Soluble Chelators
40 mM EDTA or 40
mM histidine was added to the suspensions of conjugated micelles prepared,
as described in the experimental section.
Dynamic Light Scattering
(I) Individual micelles: Samples for dynamic light
scattering (DLS) measurements (0.5 mL
final volume) were prepared by mixing 375 μL of DDW with 125
μL of 0.2 M OG; or 400 μL of DDW with 100 μL of
0.2 M DM; or 450 μL of DDW with 50 μL of either 0.2 M
OTG or 0.2 M C8E4. This was followed by 5 min centrifugation at a
relative centrifugal force (RCF) 21,000; and 400 μL of the resulting
supernatant was used for determining the hydrodynamic size distribution.
(II) Conjugated micelles: Micellar conjugation was initiated
by adding 24 μL of 15 mM DP-nonyl and 40 μL of 0.1 M FeSO4 in DDW to the original 400 μL samples. Following 20
min incubation at 19 °C, DLS measurements were then immediately
performed. (III) Process reversibility with EDTA or histidine: To 464 μL of conjugated OG, OTG, C8E4, or DM micelles, 80
μL of 0.2 M EDTA (at pH 7.5) or 80 μL of 0.2 M histidine
(at pH 7.5) was added and incubated at 19 °C for different periods
of time. This was followed by 10 min centrifugation at a RCF 21,000
using Ultrafree MC-VV centrifugal filter Durapore [poly(vinylidene
difluoride), 0.1 μm] prior to analysis. Intensity-weighted size
distributions were determined using the auto correlation spectroscopy
protocol of a NANOPHOX instrument (Sympatec GmbH, Germany).
Light
Microscopy
Images were obtained using an Olympus
CX-40 light microscope equipped with an Olympus U-TV1X-2 digital camera.
Results and Discussion
Three commercially available bipyridine
analogues with increasing
hydrophobicity were studied (Figure B). In the most hydrophobic analogue, DP-nonyl, each
of the pyridine rings in the bipyridine moiety is bound to an aliphatic
tail comprising nine carbons (Figure B), thereby anchoring the chelator in the micelle core.
In DP-tert-butyl or DP-methyl, each pyridine ring
is bound to four or one carbon atoms, respectively, and hence, these
chelators are less lipophilic (Figure B). Addition of DP-nonyl to a non-ionic detergent micellar
suspension (OG, OTG, DM, or C8E4), followed by Fe2+ ions,
which can bind three bipyridine moieties,[14] led after 24 h of incubation at 19 °C to phase separation in
the form of red, oil-rich globules, ranging in size from 15 to 1000
μm (Figure ,
left hand side). The input (detergent: DP-nonyl) stoichiometric ratios
during micellar conjugation was 1:28 for OG, 1:22 for OTG or C8E4,
and 1:44 for DM, respectively. Since the aggregation number (NA) for OG is ∼100,[19] for OTG (NA ∼ 114[20]), for C8E4, (∼95[21]), and DM (∼125[19]), it follows
that a maximum ∼3–4 chelators per micelle are required
to trigger phase separation.
Figure 2
Light microscopy images taken 24 h after conjugation
of octyl glucoside
(OG), octylthioglucoside (OTG), decyl maltoside (DM), and tetraethylene
glycol monooctyl ether (C8E4) micelles with bipyridine analogue chelators
and 10 mM Fe2+. Insets show images of the system immediately
after addition of Fe2+. Scale bar indicates 200 μm.
Light microscopy images taken 24 h after conjugation
of octyl glucoside
(OG), octylthioglucoside (OTG), decyl maltoside (DM), and tetraethylene
glycol monooctyl ether (C8E4) micelles with bipyridine analogue chelators
and 10 mM Fe2+. Insets show images of the system immediately
after addition of Fe2+. Scale bar indicates 200 μm.The color of the globules derives from the [(bipyridine)3:Fe2+] red complex.[22] Whereas
phase separation was readily observed with all detergents tested in
the presence of the DP-nonyl chelator, DP-methyl promoted phase separation
only with OTG and C8E4 (Figure ), and DP-tert-butyl promoted phase separation
with all detergents except for DM (Figure ). This finding is consistent with the observed
increased hydrophobicity of DP-nonyl as compared to the other two
dipyridine (DP) analogues. In order to avoid generation of red color
that might interfere with spectroscopic analyses, micelle conjugation
with cations other than Fe2+ was also tested. We found
that replacing Fe2+ ions by Ni2+ led to clear
phase separation with all (chelator:detergent) combinations (Supporting Information, Figure S1). We note that
the binding affinity of the bipyridine moiety to Ni2+ is
1000-fold higher than that of Fe2+.[14]In an attempt to introduce additional conformational
freedom to
inter-micellar interactions, we explored the possibility of adding
EDTA to compete for metal binding following OG micelle conjugation
with the [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] complex and subsequent
oil-rich globule formation (Figure A). We observed that 10 min after addition of 40 mM
EDTA, the majority of the red globules had disappeared. The rapid
kinetics of conjugation reversal would argue that conjugating OG micelles
does not produce fusion. Similar behavior was observed with C8E4 and
DM micelles (Supporting Information, Figure
S2A,B). However, more than 30 min were required to dissociate conjugated
OTG micelles and eliminate the red color (Figure B). The presence of a sulfur atom bound to
the anomeric carbon of glucose in OTG, making this detergent more
lipophilic than OG, may be responsible for the slower response.
Figure 3
Micelle conjugation
reversibility observed after addition of EDTA.
(A,B). Light microscope images of red, oil-rich globules generated
following the conjugation of detergent micelles with [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] amphiphilic complexes (for experimental
details, see the Materials and Methods section).
Following phase separation, addition of 40 mM EDTA results in the
disappearance of the red colored, oil-rich globules. Scale bar indicates
200 μm. (C–F). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis
of micellar conjugation and its reversal. Black lines—individual
detergent micelles; blue lines—following 20 min incubation
with the amphiphilic [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] complex;
green lines—following addition of 33 mM EDTA and 1 h incubation.
Detergent concentration for DLS analysis: OG—50 mM; OTG—12
mM; C8E4—20 mM; and DM—40 mM.
Micelle conjugation
reversibility observed after addition of EDTA.
(A,B). Light microscope images of red, oil-rich globules generated
following the conjugation of detergent micelles with [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] amphiphilic complexes (for experimental
details, see the Materials and Methods section).
Following phase separation, addition of 40 mM EDTA results in the
disappearance of the red colored, oil-rich globules. Scale bar indicates
200 μm. (C–F). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis
of micellar conjugation and its reversal. Black lines—individual
detergent micelles; blue lines—following 20 min incubation
with the amphiphilic [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] complex;
green lines—following addition of 33 mM EDTA and 1 h incubation.
Detergent concentration for DLS analysis: OG—50 mM; OTG—12
mM; C8E4—20 mM; and DM—40 mM.DLS provided evidence on the submicron scale for reversal of micelle
conjugation with the [(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+] complex
(Figure C–F).
Consistent with light microscopy images, we found that 20 min after
introduction of the amphiphilic complex to the micellar dispersion,
individual micelles (6–9 nm) were no longer detectible in the
suspension. Rather, particles more than 2 orders of magnitude larger
(i.e., hydrodynamic diameter 330–2105 nm) were generated with
all detergents tested (Figure C–F). Subsequent addition of 40 mM EDTA recovered micelles
with hydrodynamic size approximately the same as that measured prior
to micelle conjugation (Figure C–F). A weaker chelator, histidine, led to the appearance
of two particle populations: one that was approximately the same as
the original micelle and a second particle that ranged between 382
and 2105 nm (Supporting Information, Figure
S3A–D). This observation is consistent with the fact that histidine
is less capable of competing for Fe2+ ions complexed with
the bipyridine moiety.Time course experiments with conjugated
OG or DM micelles show
that 33 mM EDTA can essentially quantitatively reverse the conjugation
process within 2 h with both detergents (Figure A,B), whereas histidine (at the same concentration)
required 2 days of incubation and led to quantitative recovery of
only DM but not OG micelles (Figure C,D). These findings provide additional support for
the assumption that a stronger chelator is more capable of competing
with the bipyridine moiety for metal binding and, hence, reverses
the process more rapidly and more efficiently.
Figure 4
Time course of the recovery
of individual OG or DM micelles after
addition of either 33 mM EDTA (A,B) or 33 mM histidine (C,D). [C]—Initial
OG or DM micellar peak. Detergent concentration for DLS analysis:
OG—50 mM; OTG—12 mM; C8E4—20 mM; and DM—40
mM.
Time course of the recovery
of individual OG or DM micelles after
addition of either 33 mM EDTA (A,B) or 33 mM histidine (C,D). [C]—Initial
OG or DM micellar peak. Detergent concentration for DLS analysis:
OG—50 mM; OTG—12 mM; C8E4—20 mM; and DM—40
mM.We further tested the possibility
of conjugating protein detergent
complexes (PDCs), containing OTG, native phospholipids, and the bacterial,
light-driven proton pump, bacteriorhodopsin (bR),[23] with the three [DO:Ni2+] complexes and assessed
process reversibility. We found that overnight incubation at 19 °C
of bR PDCs with the three amphiphilic complexes led to purple globules
(Figure A–C).
Preservation of the purple color verified the native conformation
of the retinal chromophore covalently bound in the protein.[24] Interestingly, in the presence of DP-nonyl but
without Ni2+, the protein denatured and lost its purple
color (Figure D),
thereby emphasizing the importance of conjugation for preservation
of the MP native state.
Figure 5
Conjugation, via [(bipyridine)3:Ni2+] complexes,
of PDCs containing the MP (bR) embedded in OTG/phospholipid mixed
micelles. (A–C) Light microscopy images showing formation of
purple globules generated after conjugating PDCs using 1 mM of [(DP-nonyl)3:Ni2+], [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Ni2+], or [(DP-methyl)3:Ni2+] complexes.
(D) Control experiments showing the formation of dark precipitate
when Ni2+ is not added together with DP-tert-butyl. Scale bar represents 200 μm. (E) DLS analysis: black
line: bR extracted from its native membrane with OTG; blue line: 2.5
h after addition of 1 mM [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Ni2+]; and green line: following addition of 40 mM EDTA.
Conjugation, via [(bipyridine)3:Ni2+] complexes,
of PDCs containing the MP (bR) embedded in OTG/phospholipid mixed
micelles. (A–C) Light microscopy images showing formation of
purple globules generated after conjugating PDCs using 1 mM of [(DP-nonyl)3:Ni2+], [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Ni2+], or [(DP-methyl)3:Ni2+] complexes.
(D) Control experiments showing the formation of dark precipitate
when Ni2+ is not added together with DP-tert-butyl. Scale bar represents 200 μm. (E) DLS analysis: black
line: bR extracted from its native membrane with OTG; blue line: 2.5
h after addition of 1 mM [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Ni2+]; and green line: following addition of 40 mM EDTA.DLS measurements demonstrated that the extracted
PDC preparation
contains OTG micelles devoid of bR (6 nm) as well as those containing
bR (12 nm) (Figure E, black line). Incubation during 2.5 h at 19 °C following the
addition of 1 mM [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Ni2+] amphiphilic complex leads to the disappearance of both
the 6 and 12 nm peak, while generating a new peak at 2521 nm (Figure E, blue line). This
marked difference in the particle size is consistent with effective
PDC conjugation. Addition of 40 mM EDTA following PDC conjugation
regenerates a peak at 13 nm, as well as at 331 nm, in parallel with
the disappearance of the peak at 2521 nm (Figure E, green line). These results imply that
conjugation of PDCs containing bR can be reversed, at least partially,
with EDTA.It therefore follows that a hydrophobic environment
can be generated
with amphiphilic [bipyridine:metal] complexes and provide a realistic
route for purification of MPs with detergents other than Triton X-114.
The ability to conjugate micelles and to generate distinct new phases:
(a) independent of the detergent cloud point; (b) regardless of the
nature of the detergent headgroup (e.g., glucose, maltose, and ethylene
glycol); (c) at 19 °C and perhaps also at lower temperatures;
(d) without the need of a precipitant (e.g., ammonium sulfate or poly(ethylene
glycol)), presents a simple route toward partial purification of MPs
or their concentration as part of a crystallization trial. However,
we do note that the higher detergent concentration within the oil-rich
globules may denature particularly labile MPs. Therefore, the suitability
of the separation/purification approach we have presented should be
assessed on a case-by-case basis.In addition, the synthetic
“cloud point” may be utilized
for structure determination of intrinsic MPs as most 3D crystals of
this class of proteins are composed of MPs embedded in micelles.[25] Therefore, amphiphilic [bipyridine:metal] complexes
may provide a simple to implement, non-denaturing avenue for bringing
PDCs into proximity and at the same time, due to the low binding affinity
of the bipyridine moiety to metal cations, allow PDCs to undergo dissociation–association
events until an organized and, hence, stable nucleation center is
reached to support the crystal growth (Figure ).
Figure 6
Cartoon showing how PDCs can be brought into
proximity with [bipyridine:M2+] amphiphilic complexes and
undergo dissociation/association
events in the presence of a water-soluble chelator. Such “breathing
events” between PDCs should allow the latter to reorient themselves
until the most stable, organized assembly is reached. Organized clusters
of PDCs stabilized by [bipyridine:M2+] complexes may represent
nucleation centers that would support crystal growth of MPs embedded
in micelles.
Cartoon showing how PDCs can be brought into
proximity with [bipyridine:M2+] amphiphilic complexes and
undergo dissociation/association
events in the presence of a water-soluble chelator. Such “breathing
events” between PDCs should allow the latter to reorient themselves
until the most stable, organized assembly is reached. Organized clusters
of PDCs stabilized by [bipyridine:M2+] complexes may represent
nucleation centers that would support crystal growth of MPs embedded
in micelles.
Conclusions
In summary, amphiphilic
[(DP-nonyl)3:Fe2+], [(DP-tert-butyl)3:Fe2+]
complexes, along with their analogous Ni2+ derivatives,
were found to conjugate non-ionic detergent (OG, OTG, DM, or C8E4)
micelles, in a strikingly efficient manner. Micelle conjugation leads
to macroscopic phase separation under ambient conditions, independent
of the detergent cloud point temperature. Comparing these observations
with our earlier studies on phenanthroline analogues, which conjugate
micelles irreversibly,[12,26] we conclude that process reversibility
in the presence of competing water-soluble chelators, EDTA or histidine,
likely derives from the relatively low binding affinity of the bipyridine
moiety for Fe2+ and Ni2+ ions. Partial or complete
reversal of micelle conjugation at temperatures close to ambient via
competition with weak (histidine) or strong (EDTA) metal chelators
should assist in (a) separating intrinsic MPs in oil-rich globules
from contaminating background (hydrophilic) proteins, (b) promoting
crystal growth of purified, intrinsic MPs by directing MP-detergent
complexes to cluster under non-denaturing conditions while, in parallel,
allowing sufficient freedom for nucleation centers to undergo energetically
favorable structural rearrangements. With the results presented above
as a strong foundation, our future work will be directed toward these
goals.
Authors: Guy Patchornik; Irishi N N Namboothiri; Divya K Nair; Ellen Wachtel; Sidney R Cohen; Noga Friedman; Mordechai Sheves Journal: J Colloid Interface Sci Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 8.128