Carla Bastida1, María Hernández-Tejero2, Marcial Cariqueo1, Fátima Aziz2, Virginia Fortuna3, Miquel Sanz2, Mercè Brunet4, Javier Fernández2,5, Dolors Soy1. 1. Pharmacy Department, Division of Medicines, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Liver ICU, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Pharmacology and Toxicology Section, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Centre, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Pharmacology and Toxicology Section, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Centre, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain. 5. European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF-Clif), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Physiopathological changes in advanced cirrhosis could alter tigecycline pharmacokinetics (PK), thus affecting serum drug concentrations and compromising target attainment. We aimed to describe tigecycline PK in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe bacterial infections, identify the sources of PK variability and assess the performance of different dosing regimens to optimize the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target. METHODS: Serum concentrations and covariates were obtained from patients with severe infections under tigecycline treatment. A population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling and the final model was used to simulate tigecycline exposure to assess the PTA. RESULTS: Twenty critically ill patients were enrolled in the study. Data were best described by a two-compartment linear model. Mean ± SD parameter estimates for clearance (CL), intercompartmental clearance (Q), central and peripheral volumes of distribution (V1 and V2) were 14.8 ± 11 L/h, 38.4 ± 24 L/h, 63.7 ± 14 L and 233 ± 30 L, respectively. MELD score significantly influenced tigecycline CL, and total serum proteins significantly affected V1. Monte Carlo simulations showed that tigecycline elimination is hampered as MELD score values increase, consequently requiring lower drug doses. Patients with hypoproteinaemia would have lower peak tigecycline concentrations but similar steady-state concentrations compared with patients with normoproteinaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that tigecycline dose adjustment is needed in severe hepatic dysfunction and suggests using the MELD score for dose optimization since it is identified as a covariate that significantly influences tigecycline CL. Dosing regimens are recommended to reach several PK/PD targets considering this clinical variable and any MIC within the susceptibility range.
OBJECTIVES: Physiopathological changes in advanced cirrhosis could alter tigecycline pharmacokinetics (PK), thus affecting serum drug concentrations and compromising target attainment. We aimed to describe tigecycline PK in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and severe bacterial infections, identify the sources of PK variability and assess the performance of different dosing regimens to optimize the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target. METHODS: Serum concentrations and covariates were obtained from patients with severe infections under tigecycline treatment. A population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling and the final model was used to simulate tigecycline exposure to assess the PTA. RESULTS: Twenty critically ill patients were enrolled in the study. Data were best described by a two-compartment linear model. Mean ± SD parameter estimates for clearance (CL), intercompartmental clearance (Q), central and peripheral volumes of distribution (V1 and V2) were 14.8 ± 11 L/h, 38.4 ± 24 L/h, 63.7 ± 14 L and 233 ± 30 L, respectively. MELD score significantly influenced tigecycline CL, and total serum proteins significantly affected V1. Monte Carlo simulations showed that tigecycline elimination is hampered as MELD score values increase, consequently requiring lower drug doses. Patients with hypoproteinaemia would have lower peak tigecycline concentrations but similar steady-state concentrations compared with patients with normoproteinaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that tigecycline dose adjustment is needed in severe hepatic dysfunction and suggests using the MELD score for dose optimization since it is identified as a covariate that significantly influences tigecycline CL. Dosing regimens are recommended to reach several PK/PD targets considering this clinical variable and any MIC within the susceptibility range.