Literature DB >> 35178497

When Do Drivers Interact with In-Vehicle Well-being Interventions? An Exploratory Analysis of a Longitudinal Study on Public Roads.

Kevin Koch1, Varun Mishra2, Shu Liu3, Thomas Berger4, Elgar Fleisch5, David Kotz2, Felix Wortmann6.   

Abstract

Recent developments of novel in-vehicle interventions show the potential to transform the otherwise routine and mundane task of commuting into opportunities to improve the drivers' health and well-being. Prior research has explored the effectiveness of various in-vehicle interventions and has identified moments in which drivers could be interruptible to interventions. All the previous studies, however, were conducted in either simulated or constrained real-world driving scenarios on a pre-determined route. In this paper, we take a step forward and evaluate when drivers interact with in-vehicle interventions in unconstrained free-living conditions. To this end, we conducted a two-month longitudinal study with 10 participants, in which each participant was provided with a study car for their daily driving needs. We delivered two in-vehicle interventions - each aimed at improving affective well-being - and simultaneously recorded the participants' driving behavior. In our analysis, we found that several pre-trip characteristics (like trip length, traffic flow, and vehicle occupancy) and the pre-trip affective state of the participants had significant associations with whether the participants started an intervention or canceled a started intervention. Next, we found that several in-the-moment driving characteristics (like current road type, past average speed, and future brake behavior) showed significant associations with drivers' responsiveness to the intervention. Further, we identified several driving behaviors that "negated" the effectiveness of interventions and highlight the potential of using such "negative" driving characteristics to better inform intervention delivery. Finally, we compared trips with and without intervention and found that both interventions employed in our study did not have a negative effect on driving behavior. Based on our analyses, we provide solid recommendations on how to deliver interventions to maximize responsiveness and effectiveness and minimize the burden on the drivers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Field Study; In-Vehicle Intervention; Interaction; Interruption; Natural Driving; Receptivity

Year:  2021        PMID: 35178497      PMCID: PMC8849608          DOI: 10.1145/3448116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol


  22 in total

Review 1.  How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies.

Authors:  Jenny Gu; Clara Strauss; Rod Bond; Kate Cavanagh
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-01-31

2.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

3.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

Authors:  M M Bradley; P J Lang
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

4.  Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery.

Authors:  Scott M Lundberg; Bala Nair; Monica S Vavilala; Mayumi Horibe; Michael J Eisses; Trevor Adams; David E Liston; Daniel King-Wai Low; Shu-Fang Newman; Jerry Kim; Su-In Lee
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 25.671

5.  Detecting Receptivity for mHealth Interventions in the Natural Environment.

Authors:  Varun Mishra; Florian Künzler; Jan-Niklas Kramer; Elgar Fleisch; Tobias Kowatsch; David Kotz
Journal:  Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol       Date:  2021-06

Review 6.  Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia.

Authors:  Carol D Ryff
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 17.659

7.  An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results.

Authors:  J Kabat-Zinn
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Continuous Detection of Physiological Stress with Commodity Hardware.

Authors:  Varun Mishra; Gunnar Pope; Sarah Lord; Stephanie Lewia; Byron Lowens; Kelly Caine; Sougata Sen; Ryan Halter; David Kotz
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Healthc       Date:  2020-04

Review 9.  Reviewing the Effectiveness of Music Interventions in Treating Depression.

Authors:  Daniel Leubner; Thilo Hinterberger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-07

10.  The Affective Slider: A Digital Self-Assessment Scale for the Measurement of Human Emotions.

Authors:  Alberto Betella; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding the Interactions Between Driving Behavior and Well-being in Daily Driving: Causal Analysis of a Field Study.

Authors:  Paul Stephan; Felix Wortmann; Kevin Koch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 7.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.