| Literature DB >> 35178395 |
Feifei Li1, Youyang Shi1, Xiaojuan Yang1, Zhanyang Luo1, Guangtao Zhang1, Kui Yu2, Feng Li2, Lixin Chen2, Youkang Zhao1, Ying Xie1, Yuanyuan Wu3, Jianfeng Yang2, Xiqiu Zhou2, Sheng Liu1.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. The application of advanced technology has promoted accurate diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Anhydroicaritin (AHI) is a flavonoid with therapeutic potential in BC treatment. The current study aimed to determine AHI's mechanism in BC treatment via RNA sequencing, comprehensive bioinformatics analysis, and experimental verification.Entities:
Keywords: GPx1; RNA sequencing; anhydroicaritin; bioinformatics analysis; breast cancer; epithelial to mesenchymal transformation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35178395 PMCID: PMC8844201 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.764481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Workflow chart of the research.
FIGURE 2AHI treatment potential in BC. (A) Chemical structure of AHI. (B) Venn diagram depicting the number of potential targets of AHI for BC treatment. (C) Waterfall map of the mutation information (TCGA-downloaded BC data). (D) AHI–targets–pathways network. (The circle represents the targets, and the arrow represents the pathways.) (E, F) AHI inhibited the survival of the 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 cells at different concentrations (24 h). *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 3Screening of DEGs by RNA-seq and enrichment analysis. (A, D) Analysis of DEGs after AHI treatment. (B, E) Identification of DEGs. (C, F) Volcano plot of the DEGs with FDR ≤0.05 and fold change ≥1.5. (The red dots indicate upregulated DEGs, green ones indicate downregulated DEGs, and black ones indicate no significant difference. The heatmap was drawn to show the DEGs.) (G, I) GO functional enrichment and (H, J) KEGG pathway enrichment of the DEGs.
FIGURE 4Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of GPX1. (A) Analysis of the protein expression of GPX1 between normal breast tissue and BC tissue. (B) The OS and (C) DFS of patients in the high and low GPX1 expression groups. (D) The reciprocal proteins of GPX1. (E) Related pathways of GPX1 by GSEA. (F) The infiltration levels of immune cells in the high and low GPX1 expression groups in patients with BC. (G) Correlation between GPX1 and the abundance of immune infiltration.
FIGURE 5GPX1 was the drug target of AHI for treating BC cells. (A) Relative GPX1 expression analyzed by RT-PCR after AHI treatment in the 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) Protein expression of GPX1 after treatment with different concentrations of AHI (*p < 0.05). (C) Combined prediction model of AHI and GPX1 domain. (D) DARTS assay was performed to test the direct binding of AHI to GPX1 in BC cells. *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 6Identification of AHI-inhibited EMT by enhancing GPX1 expression. (A, B) Relationship between GPX1 expression and EMT. (C, D) AHI significantly increased E-cadherin (green fluorescence) and decreased vimentin (orange fluorescence) expression (×630) by confocal immunofluorescence analysis.
FIGURE 7AHI enhances GPX1 expression and inhibits EMT in the BC xenograft mouse model. (A) Diagram showing the scheme for tumor implantation and AHI treatment. (B–D) BC proliferation after AHI treatment in the mouse model. (E) IHC analysis of GPX1, proliferation-related, and EMT-related proteins after AHI treatment in mice. *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 8Schematic diagram of the mechanism possibly involved in AHI-mediated BC.