Literature DB >> 35178243

Liver abscess secondary to fishbone ingestion: case report and review of the literature.

Niamh Grayson1, Hiba Shanti1, Ameet G Patel1.   

Abstract

We report a rare silent migration of a fishbone into the liver and review the relevant literature. A 56-year-old man presented with a 2-day history of dull epigastric pain and raised inflammatory markers. Computerized tomography scan revealed a 4-cm abscess in the left lobe of the liver, with a linear radio-dense foreign body within the collection. At laparoscopy the hepatogastric fistula was disconnected. The fishbone was retrieved from the liver. Gastrostomy was closed with an omental patch. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Fifty-two cases of liver abscess secondary to enterohepatic fishbone migration were reported with over two-thirds presenting with a left-lobe abscess. There was marked variability in the management of liver abscess in the setting of fishbone migration-summarized in table. We believe that laparoscopic drainage of the abscess and extraction of the foreign body offer control of the source of sepsis and diminishes recurrence, whilst having a low-risk profile. Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35178243      PMCID: PMC8846943          DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2042-8812


INTRODUCTION

Foreign body ingestion is a common occurrence, majority of these pass without complications [1]. An estimated 1% of ingested foreign bodies result in gastrointestinal perforation, these are often sharp objects, such as accidentally ingested fishbones [2]. The sites of perforation vary, with the rectosigmoid or ileocolic being the most common [3]. We report a rare case of fishbone migration resulting in liver abscess and review of the literature. This was originally described in 1898 by Lambert [4].

CASE PRESENTATION

A 56-year-old man presented with a 2-day history of epigastric pain, leucocytosis and raised C Reactive Protein (CRP). A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed evidence of a 4.2 × 2.5 cm abscess in the left lobe of the liver (Segment III), with a linear radio-dense foreign body seen within the collection (Fig. 1). There was fat stranding around the pylorus. The patient was treated with antibiotics in his local hospital and a trial of aspiration revealed purulent fluid. An oesphagoduodenoscopy (OGD) was normal with no evidence of foreign body or inflammation in the stomach.
Figure 1

CT scan showing left lobe liver abscess with fishbone.

CT scan showing left lobe liver abscess with fishbone. Review of literature reported cases of enterohepatic fishbone migration The patient was transferred to our Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) unit. On arrival, he was clinically well and asymptomatic. A repeat CT scan showed a persistent collection in the liver. On further enquiry, the patient revealed that a few weeks earlier as he had a transient episode of choking and discomfort whilst eating fish. On laparoscopy, the left lateral segment of the liver was adherent to the gastric antrum (Fig. 2). Adhesions between the liver and stomach were divided with blunt and sharp dissection. The fishbone was pulled out of the liver intact and extracted through the port. The abscess was opened, drained and washed. A sealed fistulous tract was identified at the antrum; this was repaired with an omental patch. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged the following day.
Figure 2

Fishbone extraction from the liver.

Fishbone extraction from the liver.

DISCUSSION

Fifty-two cases of liver abscess secondary to enterohepatic fishbone migration have been reported in the English literature (Table 1). Most common symptoms included: anorexia, epigastric pain and fever. The lack of history of ingestion of a fishbone often leads to a diagnostic dilemma. CT scan was diagnostic in 47 that had axial imaging, three fishbones were found intra-operatively and two on autopsy. Over two-thirds of reported cases presented with a left lobe abscess, this is attributable to the anatomical proximity of the stomach.
Table 1

Review of literature reported cases of enterohepatic fishbone migration

AuthorPatient detailsSymptomsDuration (d)Fishbone locationFishbone size (mm)Site of perforationManagement
Hernández-Villafranca, Spain, 2021 [26]73 FNA14Left lobe30DuodenumLaparoscopic fishbone removal
Allam, UK, 2020 [9]53 FPain, fever7Right lobeNAPylorusAntibiotics. Fishbone left in situ
Barkai, 2020, Israel [11]66 FPainNARight lobeNANALaparoscopic fishbone removal
Burkholder, USA, 2019 [14]64 FNA8Left lobe21NAPercutaneous abscess drainage. Fishbone left in situ
Bandeira-de-Mello, Brazil 2018 [10]44 FNA14Left lobe25AntrumLaparoscopic fishbone removal
Bekki T, Japan, 2019 [13]51 MFeverNALeft lobe24AntrumLaparoscopic fishbone removal
Beckers, Belgium, 2021 [12]74 FPain, fever3Right lobe35NALaparoscopic fishbone removal
Goyal, USA, 2019 [25]68 MPain, fever, WL30Left lobeNAPylorusPercutaneous abscess drainage. Fishbone left in situ
56 MPain, fever14Right lobeNADuodenumRobotic fishbone removal
Li, China, 2019 [32]58 MFever9Left lobe40NALaparoscopic left hepatectomy
Sim, Singapore, 2019 [42]56 FFever, vomiting2Right lobeNAStomachLaparotomy and abscess drainage. Fishbone left in situ
Queiroz, Brazil, 2019 [40]50 MPain, fever10Left lobeNAAntrumSurgical removal
Yu, China, 2018 [49]34 FPain, fever, vomiting8Left lobe30NALaparotomy and fishbone removal
Peixoto, Portugal, 2016 [38]78 MFever, vomiting2Right lobe35NALaparotomy and fishbone removal
Venkatesan, Australia, 2019 [44]88 FPain60Left lobeNAAntrumLaparoscopic fishbone removal
Gómez Portilla, Spain, 2019 [24]50 FPain, fever28Left lobe25NALeft hepatectomy with bone removal
69 FNANALeft lobeNANASurgical removal
Chen, 2019, China [15]37 MPain60Left lobe17NALiver resection
Mateus, Portugal, 2018 [34]76 MPain3Left lobe50NALaparotomy and fishbone removal
45 MWeakness, chills2Right lobeNANAPercutaneous abscess drainage Fishbone left in situ
Fujiwara, Japan, 2017 [21]69 MPain, fever14Right lobe35NALaparotomy with Fishbone removal
Dias, Brazil, 2018 [18]35 MPain, feverNALeft lobe25NALaparotomy with fishbone removal
Lau, Singapore, 2017 [30]85 FPain, feverNALeft lobe40PylorusPercutaneous fishbone removal
Tan, Singapore, 2016 [43]56 MPain, fever14Left lobeNAAntrumLaparoscopic Fishbone removal
63 MFever14Left lobeNAStomachLaparoscopic Fishbone removal
Esseghaier, Tunisia, 2015 [20]68 MPain, fever7Right lobe20DuodenumLaparotomy with fishbone removal
Ede, South Africa, 2015 [19]61 MPain, fever21Left lobe60NALaparotomy with fishbone removal
Panebianco, Italy, 2015 [37]57 FPain, fever14Left lobe40AntrumLaparoscopic Fishbone removal
Dinnoo, France, 201560 FPain, SepsisNARight lobeNADuodenumLaparoscopic fishbone removal
Xiao, China, 2015 [46]47 FPain365Left lobe25NALaparoscopic fishbone removal
Venkatesh, Singapore, 2015 [45]69 MPain, fever5Left lobe14StomachLeft hepatectomy
Koşar, Turkey, 2014 [29]73 FFeverNALeft lobeNANALaparoscopic fishbone removal
Dangoisse, Belgium, 2014 [17]56 MFever, SOB3Left lobe30StomachLaparotomy with fishbone removal
Matrella, France, 2014 [35]63 FPain, fever10Right lobe40NALaparotomy with fishbone removal
83 FPain, feverNALeft lobeNANALaparotomy with fishbone removal
Gaba, USA, 2013 [22]33 FFever14Left lobe30NAPercutaneous removal of fishbone
Masoodi, Saudi Arabia, 2012 [5]45 MPain, fever10Right lobe25DuodenumLaparotomy with fishbone removal
Jarry, France, 2011 [27]68 FPain, fever14Right lobe35DuodenumLaparotomy with fishbone removal
Liang, China, 2011 [33]60 MPain, fever30Left lobe27StomachSurgical removal
Ng, Singapore, 2011 [36]59 MFeverNARight lobeNAPylorusAntibiotics. Bone left in situ
Chen, China, 2011 [15]59 FPain, fever14Left lobe40DuodenumLiver resection
Yen, China, 2010 [48]36 MPain, fever14Left lobeNANASurgical removal
Santos, Portugal, 2007 [41]62 FPain, fever42Left lobe33AntrumLaparotomy and fishbone removal
Kadowaki, Japan, 2007 [28]73 FPain, fever7Left lobe28NALaparotomy and fishbone removal
Clarençon, France, 2008 [16]64 MPain, feverNARight lobe23NAFailed open surgical removal Percutaneous removal of fishbone
Perera, Sri Lanka, 2007 [39]59 FPainNALeft lobe45NALaparotomy and fishbone removal
Lee, China, 2005 [31]65 FPain, vomiting7Left lobe35AntrumLaparotomy and fishbone removal
Goh, Singapore, 2005 [23]32 MFever5Right lobe30DuodenumLaparotomy and fishbone removal
Yang, China, 2005 [47]40 MFever7Left lobe50NAPercutaneous abscess drainage. Fishbone left in situ
Theodoropoulou, Greece, 2002 [7]46 MPain, fever, jaundice3Left lobe50NAAntibiotics. Fishbone left in situ
De la Vega, Spain, 2001 [6]86 FPain, vomitingNARight lobe25NAAntibiotics. Fishbone left in situ
Horii, Japan, 1999 [2]61 MFever14Left lobe28NAPercutaneous abscess drainage and removal of fishbone.
There was marked variability in the management of liver abscess in the setting of fishbone migration. A variety of approaches including laparotomy, laparoscopy, CT guidance and liver resection were utilized to remove the fishbones. Percutaneous drainage usually results in the resolution of liver abscess, but recurrence is likely. Nine patients had the fishbone left in situ, one patient ultimately required a laparotomy for fishbone removal [5]. There were two mortalities in these patients with the fishbone left in situ (2/7, 29%), these were secondary to overwhelming sepsis, and the fishbones were discovered at autopsy [6, 7].

LEARNING POINTS/TAKE-HOME MESSAGES

Left lobe liver abscess should raise the suspicion of a foreign body. Antibiotic treatment and drainage are effective in the short term. The retained foreign body acts as a nidus for recurrent infection and requires removal to prevent recurrence and mortality. Previous presentation: Poster presentation in UGI conference 2021.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

FUNDING

Kings College London (JISC affiliated).
  47 in total

1.  A fish bone in the liver.

Authors:  M de la Vega; J C Rivero; L Ruíz; S Suárez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Successful treatment of a hepatic abscess formed secondary to fish bone penetration by laparoscopic removal of the foreign body: report of a case.

Authors:  Mehmet Nuri Koşar; İhsan Oruk; Murat Burç Yazıcıoğlu; Çiğdem Erol; Birgül Çabuk
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-09

3.  Laparoscopic Extraction of a Hepatic Fish Bone Mimicking a Liver Mass After Gastric Perforation.

Authors:  Le Xiao; Jian-Wei Li; Shu-Guo Zheng
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Bone Causing Abdominal Groans.

Authors:  Pradeep Goyal; Sonali Gupta; Joshua Sapire
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Liver hilar abscesses secondary to gastrointestinal perforation by ingested fish bones: surgical management of two cases.

Authors:  Fulvio Matrella; Martin Lhuaire; Tullio Piardi; Safi Dokmak; Onorina Bruno; Quentin Maestraggi; Reza Kianmanesh; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Image-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Removal of Fish Bone from Liver Abscess.

Authors:  Chin Wah Lau; Kang Min Wong; Apoorva Gogna
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-28

7.  Hepatic abscess secondary to foreign body perforation of the stomach.

Authors:  Kit-Fai Lee; Wa Chu; Siu-Wang Wong; Paul Bo-San Lai
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.767

8.  Migrated fish bone induced liver abscess: medical management.

Authors:  Moustafa Allam; Stephanos Pericleous
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-06-30

9.  Uncommon cause of liver abscess.

Authors:  Andre R Dias; Daniel J Szor; Claudia B A Ferreira; Carmen L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-01

Review 10.  Laparoscopic management of enterohepatic migrated fish bone mimicking liver neoplasm: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Chao Wang; Jianyong Zhuo; Xue Wen; Qi Ling; Zhikun Liu; Haijun Guo; Xiao Xu; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.