| Literature DB >> 35177903 |
Lu Chen1, Shan-Yong Zhou2, Wei Zhu3, Sheng-Ping Liu4, Jing-Xi Zhang5, He Zhuang5, Jing-Ling Zhang5, Yong-Sheng Li6, Fei Gao4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) has been regarded as a gold standard for early diagnosis and prognosis monitoring of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in clinical practice. Owing to its low concentration in blood, accurate determination of cTnI often requires high sensitivity. However, current established point-of-care (POC) assays are insufficient to meet clinically analytical requirements due to their low sensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: GdVO4:30% Eu NPs; cardiac troponin I; lateral flow test strip; point-of-care test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35177903 PMCID: PMC8843803 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S346415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Scheme 1Schematic illustration for configuration and principle of the cTnI determination.
Figure 1SEM images of GdVO4:30% Eu NPs. (A) Scale bar = 1 μm and (B) scale bar = 100 nm. TEM images of GdVO4:30% Eu NPs with different molar of Cit3-/Gd3+ (C) 4:1, (D) 3:1, (E) 2:1. Inset of b: DLS of the GdVO4:30% Eu NPs. Inset of c: HRTEM image of GdVO4:30% Eu NPs (scale bar = 5 nm).
Figure 2(A) The excitation spectrum (black line) and emission spectrum (red line) of GdVO4:30% Eu NPs. (B) The PL decay from 5D0 of the NPs emission monitoring at 618 nm.
Figure 3(A) The photos of LFA system toward different-concentration cTnI standards under UV light excitation. From left to right, the concentrations are 2.5, 0.25, 0.025 and 0 ng mL−1 in order. (B) Calibration curve between the relative fluorescence intensity (T/C) versus the cTnI concentration.
Comparison of Various Methods for cTnI Determination
| Materials | Detection Method | Linear Range | Detection Limit | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 nm AuNP-(ald) HRP-Ab and 40 nm AuNP-(ald) HRP-Ab | LFA | 10°–104 and 101–104 pg mL−1 | 5.6 pg mL−1 and 30 pg mL−1 | [ |
| Carbon nanofibers modified cellulose | LFA | 0–250 ng mL−1 | 1.28–1.40 ng mL−1 | [ |
| ZrMOF@CdTe nanoparticles | LFA | 0–1 mg L−1 | 250 ng mL−1 | [ |
| Alexa Fluor dye | LFA | 0–100 ng mL−1 | 19 pg mL−1 | [ |
| Polyvinyl alcohol | LFA | 10°–105 pg mL−1 | 0.92 ng mL−1 | [ |
| Streptococcal protein G modified polystyrene microspheres | LFA | 0.05–32 ng mL−1 | 32 pg mL−1 | [ |
| Raspberry-type Eu-SiNP | LFA | 0–1.16 ng mL−1 | 97 pg mL−1 | [ |
| Peptide-functionalized gold nanoparticles | Colorimetry | 0.1–1000 ng mL−1 | 0.2 ng mL−1 | [ |
| Gold nanorods (AuNRs) on heparin | Colorimetry | 0.5–15 ng mL−1 | 0.4 ng mL−1 | [ |
| PDMS-AuNPs composite film | Colorimetry | 0.01–5 ng mL−1 | 0.01 ng mL−1 | [ |
| GdVO4:30% Eu NPs | LFA | 0.02–30 ng mL−1 | 17 pg mL−1 | This work |
The Reproducibility Results of the Developed LFA Strip
| cTnI (ng mL−1) | Intra-Assay Precision (n=10) | Inter-Assay Precision (n=10) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (ng mL−1) | CV (%) | Mean ± SD (ng mL−1) | CV (%) | |
| 0.62 | 0.55 ± 0.08 | 6.86 | 0.52 ± 0.11 | 6.92 |
| 2.62 | 2.53 ± 0.08 | 4.86 | 2.42 ± 0.11 | 4.92 |
| 8.45 | 8.19 ± 0.41 | 3.67 | 8.21 ± 0.67 | 5.26 |
| 20.29 | 21.36 ± 1.98 | 6.29 | 22.56 ± 2.63 | 7.92 |
The Specificity Results of the Developed LFA Strip with Interferents on cTnI Detection
| cTnI (ng mL−1) | cTnI (1.62 ng mL−1) | cTnI (2.93 ng mL−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | RD (%) | Value | RD (%) | |
| Control | 1.64 | 1.2 | 3.08 | 5.1 |
| Bilirubin | 1.72 | 6.2 | 3.15 | 7.5 |
| Sodium azide | 1.52 | −6.2 | 2.84 | −3.1 |
| Cholesterol | 1.69 | 4.3 | 2.98 | 1.7 |
| Hemoglobin | 1.53 | −5.6 | 2.81 | −4.1 |
| Human serum albumin | 1.25 | 2.5 | 2.54 | 3.5 |
| Cardiac troponin T | 1.68 | 3.6 | 3.56 | 2.8 |
| Immunoglobulin G | 1.85 | −1.5 | 2.37 | 1.9 |
Note: RD = (Value-Standard value)/Standard value.
Figure 4Fluorescence intensity decay rate of the LFA strip at different repeat times. Black dots: GdVO4 NPs probe; red dots: Polystyrene microsphere.
Figure 5(A) The fluorescence signals of various concentrations of cTnI ranging from 0.1–30 ng mL−1 spiked in Beckman cTnI quality control serum samples at different sites on the NC membrane. (B) Linear regression analysis of cTnI in Beckman quality control serum samples. (C) Correlation between the LFA kit based on GdVO4:30% Eu NPs and commercial kit for the determination of cTnI in 86 serum samples. (D) The difference between the developed LFA kit value and the commercial kit.