| Literature DB >> 35177576 |
Jun Hee Shin1, Sae-Mi Lee2,3, Hyun Ho Kim1,4,5, Jin Kyu Kim1,4,5.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35177576 PMCID: PMC8859552 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Lab Med ISSN: 2234-3806 Impact factor: 4.941
Fig. 1Pedigree and genetic evaluation of the patient. (A) Pedigree with mutations indicated. The black arrow indicates the proband. The schematic alleles show the heterozygous variant in CCDC39. (B) Sanger sequencing traces for the patient and his father and mother. The variant c.2497_2498del (red arrow) in CCDC39 was confirmed to be inherited from the father (reference sequence: NM_181426.1). (C) The red rectangle indicates WGS data showing a lower sequencing depth (39.7X) than the adjacent area (71.5X) and paired-end reads with a deletion of the region 180,386,901–180,406,578 in chromosome 3 [hg19]. (D) Gap-PCR revealed a 2.7 kb-sized band corresponding to deletion of the 5’ UTR and exon 1 of CCDC39 in the patient and his mother.
Abbreviations: WGS, whole genome sequencing; UTR, untranslated region.
Fig. 2Schematic representation of the deletion in CCDC39 and gap-PCR. The inferred size of deleted region in CCDC39 is 19,677 bp. PCR primer pairs are designed to flank a deleted region. The expected amplicon size was 2,724 bp. Deleted region (pink bar) includes 5` UTR and exon 1 of CCDC39 (yellow vertical bar). Breakpoints of the deleted region are located repeat regions (blue bar), which make it difficult to confirm with Sanger sequencing.
Abbreviation: UTR, untranslated region.