Literature DB >> 35177529

Differences in Clinically Important Physical Function Improvement in Workers' Compensation Population.

Elliot D K Cha1, Conor P Lynch1, Caroline N Jadczak1, Shruthi Mohan1, Cara E Geoghegan1, Kern Singh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving workers' compensation demonstrate a propensity for poorer postoperative outcomes. This study aims to determine rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement in patients receiving workers' compensation following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospective surgical database from 2015 to 2020 for primary, single-level TLIFs with posterior instrumentation for degenerative spinal pathologies. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) were collected pre- and postoperatively. Patients were separated by workers' compensation (WC) status. Propensity score matching was performed to account for differences in demographic characteristics. Postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were calculated using paired Student's t test, and intergroup differences were determined by Mann-Whitney U test. Achievement of MCID was determined using established values, and intergroup differences were assessed using χ 2 analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included in this study with 29 WC and 92 non-WC patients. The mean age was 53.5 years with the majority being men (63.6%) and nonobese (54.5%). WC patients demonstrated significantly poorer PROM values at all timepoints except for preoperative VAS back (P = 0.297) and leg (P = 0.475). Overall achievement of MCID was significantly lower for WC patients for VAS back (P = 0.040), ODI (P = 0.001), SF-12 PCS (P = 0.010), and PROMIS-PF (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: WC patients demonstrated poorer postoperative outcomes at multiple timepoints. Additionally, a significantly lower rate of MCID achievement for back pain, disability, and physical function was observed for WC patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that WC patients may require alternative preoperative counseling about realistic expectations for improvement following lumbar fusion. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2022 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lumbar fusion; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); propensity score match; workers' compensation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35177529      PMCID: PMC9519079          DOI: 10.14444/8186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  32 in total

Review 1.  Spine Surgery Outcomes in Workers' Compensation Patients.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; Eren O Kuris; Dominic T Kleinhenz; Mark A Palumbo
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  The effect of compensation involvement on the reporting of pain and disability by patients referred for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J Rainville; J B Sobel; C Hartigan; A Wright
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Perception of traumatic onset, compensation status, and physical findings: impact on pain severity, emotional distress, and disability in chronic pain patients.

Authors:  D C Turk; A Okifuji
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-10

4.  Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays.

Authors:  H R Guo; S Tanaka; W E Halperin; L L Cameron
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States.

Authors:  J Paul Leigh
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Lumbar Fusion in Utah Workers' Compensation Patients: Changing Outcomes Across a Decade.

Authors:  Jessica G Cuneo; M Scott DeBerard; Anthony J Wheeler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Steven D Glassman; Brian R Subach; Sigurd Berven; Thomas C Schuler; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  What is different about workers' compensation patients? Socioeconomic predictors of baseline disability status among patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Tor D Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Emily A Blood; Glenn S Pransky; William A Abdu; Gunnar B Andersson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  High-Risk Subgroup Membership Is a Predictor of 30-Day Morbidity Following Anterior Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Rachel S Bronheim; Jun S Kim; John Di Capua; Nathan J Lee; Parth Kothari; Sulaiman Somani; Kevin Phan; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11

10.  The Effect of Workers' Compensation Status on the Patient Experience.

Authors:  Jocelyn Compton; Natalie Glass; Timothy Fowler
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.