Stephan Polterauer1, Olaf Reich2, Andreas Widschwendter3, Laudia Hadjari4, Gerhard Bogner5, Alexander Reinthaller6, Elmar Joura6, Gerda Trutnovsky2, Alexandra Ciresa-Koenig3, Julia Ganhoer-Schimboeck4, Ina Boehm5, Regina Berger7, Eva Langthaler8, Stephan W Aberle9, Georg Heinze10, Andreas Gleiss10, Christoph Grimm6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: stephan.polterauer@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Department of Gynecology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN), Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstr. 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austrian AGO, Innsbruck, Austria. 8. Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 9. Center for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 10. Section for Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In a previous phase II trial, we showed that topical imiquimod (IMQ) therapy is an efficacious treatment for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Aim of the present study was to investigate the non-inferiority of a 16-week topical, self-applied IMQ therapy compared to large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in patients diagnosed with HSIL. METHODS: Phase III randomized, controlled, multicenter, open trial performed by Austrian Gynecologic Oncology group. Patients with histologically proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 (30 years and older) or CIN3 (18 years and older) and satisfactory colposcopy were randomized to topical IMQ treatment or LLETZ. Successful treatment was defined as negative HPV high-risk test result 6 months after start of the treatment. Secondary endpoints were histological outcome and HPV clearance rates. RESULTS: Within 3 years 93 patients were randomized, received the allocated treatment and were available for ITT analysis. In the IMQ group negative HPV test at 6 months after treatment start was observed in 22/51 (43.1%) of patients compared to 27/42 (64.3%) in the LLETZ group on ITT analysis (rate difference 21.2%-points, 95% two-sided CI: 0.8 to 39.1). In the IMQ group histologic regression 6 months after treatment was observed in 32/51 (63%) of patients and complete histologic remission was observed in 19/51 (37%) of patients. Complete surgical resection was observed in 84% after LLETZ. CONCLUSION: In women with HSIL, IMQ treatment results in lower HPV clearance rates when compared to LLETZ. LLETZ remains the standard for women with HSIL when treatment is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01283763, EudraCT number: 2012-004518-32.
OBJECTIVE: In a previous phase II trial, we showed that topical imiquimod (IMQ) therapy is an efficacious treatment for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Aim of the present study was to investigate the non-inferiority of a 16-week topical, self-applied IMQ therapy compared to large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in patients diagnosed with HSIL. METHODS: Phase III randomized, controlled, multicenter, open trial performed by Austrian Gynecologic Oncology group. Patients with histologically proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 (30 years and older) or CIN3 (18 years and older) and satisfactory colposcopy were randomized to topical IMQ treatment or LLETZ. Successful treatment was defined as negative HPV high-risk test result 6 months after start of the treatment. Secondary endpoints were histological outcome and HPV clearance rates. RESULTS: Within 3 years 93 patients were randomized, received the allocated treatment and were available for ITT analysis. In the IMQ group negative HPV test at 6 months after treatment start was observed in 22/51 (43.1%) of patients compared to 27/42 (64.3%) in the LLETZ group on ITT analysis (rate difference 21.2%-points, 95% two-sided CI: 0.8 to 39.1). In the IMQ group histologic regression 6 months after treatment was observed in 32/51 (63%) of patients and complete histologic remission was observed in 19/51 (37%) of patients. Complete surgical resection was observed in 84% after LLETZ. CONCLUSION: In women with HSIL, IMQ treatment results in lower HPV clearance rates when compared to LLETZ. LLETZ remains the standard for women with HSIL when treatment is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01283763, EudraCT number: 2012-004518-32.
Keywords:
CIN; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Conization; HPV; HSIL; High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Human papillomavirus; Imiquimod; LLETZ; Large loop excision of the transformation zone