| Literature DB >> 35176186 |
N F Post1, N Ezekwe2, V S Narayan1, M W Bekkenk1, N Van Geel3, I Hamzavi2, T Passeron4, A Wolkerstorfer1.
Abstract
Various types of lasers have been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of vitiligo. The mode of action of these lasers is just as varied as the purpose of intervention. Many clinicians are not aware of the unique opportunity these lasers offer to improve the outcomes of vitiligo treatment. To date, no clear overview exists of the use of lasers in vitiligo treatment. Thus, the aim of this review is to discuss the various types of lasers and provide an overview of the evidence for their efficacy. We found good evidence from a systematic review that the excimer laser is effective, induces repigmentation rates comparable to NB-UVB and has improved outcomes when combined with calcineurin inhibitors. Ablative lasers are commonly used for tissue graft or melanocyte-keratinocyte cell graft transplantation. They provide safe, fast and uniform denudation of the epidermis with propitious repigmentation outcomes. We found conflicting evidence from two systematic reviews regarding the efficacy of fractional ablative lasers for improving outcomes of NB-UVB therapy, a systematic review including only fractional ablative lasers provided evidence for efficacy. Q-switched nanosecond lasers have shown to be safe and effective for inducing depigmentation, although recurrence is common, and most studies were small and retrospective. Despite proven efficacy and safety, laser treatments are relatively expensive and suited for limited body surface areas and selected cases. Each type of laser has benefits and risks associated and should, therefore, be individually chosen based on location, extent, activity and type of vitiligo.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35176186 PMCID: PMC9314124 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ISSN: 0926-9959 Impact factor: 9.228
Description of laser type, treatment protocol and outcomes
| First Author, Year, ref | Laser type, wavelength | (sub)type vitiligo | Study design | Number of patients/ patches | Monotherapy/ combination therapy | Treatment compared to | Outcomes, results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltás, 2002 | Excimer laser 308 nm | Segmental, focal | Case series | 6 patients | Monotherapy | – | Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation 50% |
|
Sun, 2015 Lopes, 2016 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | Systematic review | 390 patients/764 patches | Monotherapy |
Excimer lamp NB‐UVB |
Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation EL 54.35% vs. NB‐UVB 51.51% EL 34.87% vs. excimer lamp 33.33% |
| Bae, 2019 | Excimer laser 308‐nm | NSV | Non‐inferiority RCT | 21 patients/ 74 paired patches | Monotherapy | 311‐nm Titanium:Sapphire laser (TSL) |
Mean repigmentation EL 55.4% TSL 58.2% |
|
Bae, 2016 Chang, 2021 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | Systematic review | 128 patients + 231 patches | Monotherapy | 308‐nm excimer laser + topical calcineurin inhibitors |
Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation EL 23.8% vs. EL + calcineurin inhibitors 46.2% EL 2.9% vs. EL + vitamin D3 analogues 13.2% EL 16.7% vs. EL + corticosteroids 42.9 |
| Li, 2019 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | RCT | 233 paediatric patients | Monotherapy | 308‐nm excimer laser + tacrolimus/ pimecrolimus/ halometasone |
Mean repigmentation EL monotherapy 57.7% EL + tacrolimus 76.6% EL + pimecrolimus 72.9% EL + halometasone 84.1%* |
| Wu, 2019 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | RCT | 138 patients | Monotherapy | 0.1% tacrolimus ointment (+ betamethasone i.m. for active vitiligo) |
Percentage achieving ≥50% repigmentation Stable vitiligo EL 47.5% vs. 0.1% tacrolimus 35% Active vitiligo EL 80.7% |
| Sung, 2018 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | Non‐inferiority RCT | 12 patients/16 paired patches | Combination therapy + 0.1% tacrolimus ointment | Continuous vs. Cyclic on‐off |
Mean repigmentation Continuous EL 51.4% Cyclic on‐off EL 49.2% |
| Hofer, 2005 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | Prospective study | 13 patients |
Monotherapy 1, 2 and 3 sessions per week | – |
Repigmentation 1 session per week 60% 2 sessions per week 79% 3 sessions per week 82% |
| Shen, 2007 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | Prospective study | 187 patients |
Monotherapy 20 sessions 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 sessions per week | – |
Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation 0.5 session per week 0% 1 session per week 25% 2 sessions per week 26% 3 sessions per week 32% |
| Fa, 2017 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | Prospective study | 979 patients | Monotherapy | – |
Repigmentation Mean 29.77% |
| Ebadi, 2015 | Excimer laser 308 nm | NSV | RCT | 39 patches | Monotherapy | MKT / MKT + excimer laser/no treatment |
Depigmentation reduction No treatment 0% EL + MKT 43.9% |
| Silpa‐Archa 2016 |
FCO2 laser 10 600 nm | NSV, local | Open label split comparison study | 6 patients | Combination therapy + MKT | Dermabrasion + MKT |
Reduction of VASI Dermabrasion VASI 84% FCO2 VASI 73.5% |
| Oh, 2001 |
Ultrapulsed CO2 laser 10 600 nm | NSV, local, focal | Case series | 11 patients / 34 patches | Combination therapy + MKT + topical or general PUVA | – |
Repigmentation Good (51–75%) 4 patches / excellent (76–100%) 30 patches |
| Hasegawa 2007 |
Short‐pulsed CO2 laser 10 600 nm | Segmental | Case series | 15 patients | Combination therapy + MKT | – |
Repigmentation Mean 100% |
| Sun, 2012 |
Ultrapulsed CO2 laser 10 600 nm | NSV, segmental | Case series | 8 patients | Combination therapy + MKT | – |
Repigmentation Mean 84.4% |
| Kaufmann 1998 |
Erbium‐YAG laser 2940 nm | NSV | Case series | 3 patients / 9 patches | Combination therapy + MKT + UVA | – |
Repigmentation 22% ‘good’ growth |
| Gupta, 2018 | Er:YAG laser 2940 nm | NSV, focal, segmental | RCT | 32 patients | Combination therapy + MKT | Mechanical dermabrasion + MKT |
Total repigmentation Er:YAG + MKT 54.7% Dermabrasion + MKT 48.8% |
| Lagrange 2019 | Er:YAG laser 2940 nm | Local, segmental | RCT | 6 patients | Combination therapy + MKT | Microneedling + MKT |
Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation Er:YAG + MKT 16.7% Microneedling + MKT 0% |
| Lommerts 2017 |
Ablative CO2 laser 10 600 nm | Segmental | RCT | 10 patients (3 vitiligo) | Combination therapy + MKT | 209‐ μm and 144‐μm full surface ablation + MKT/No treatment |
Median repigmentation Fractional ablation 0% 209‐μm full surface ablation 68.7% 144‐μm full surface ablation 58.3% |
| Bayoumi 2012 |
Er:YAG laser 2940 nm | NSV | RCT | 24 paired lesions | Combination therapy + hydrocortisone 17‐butyrate cream + NB‐UVB | Hydrocortisone 17‐butyrate cream + NB‐UVB |
Percentage achieving ≥50% repigmentation Dermabrasion + hydrocortisone 17‐butyrate cream + NB‐UVB: 45.9% Hydrocortisone 17‐butyrate cream + NB‐UVB 8.4% |
| Kim, 2020 |
FCO2 laser 10 600 nm | NSV | SR | 123 cases | Combination therapy + NB‐UVB | NB‐UVB |
Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation FCO2 + NB‐UVB 8.1% |
| Chang, 2020 |
FCO2 laser 10 600 nm | NSV | SR | 140 patients | Combination therapy + NB‐UVB | NB‐UVB |
Percentage achieving ≥75% repigmentation FCO2 + NB‐UVB 10.6% |
| Huang 2019 | Er:YAG laser 2940 nm | NSV | Retrospective study | 684 patients / 1,026 lesions | Combination therapy + laser‐assisted delivery of topical compound betamethasone solution | – |
Repigmentation Mean 40.3% |
| Kim, 2001 | QS ruby laser 694 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Case report | 1 patient | Combination therapy + Neo‐adjuvant PUVA | – | Relapse after complete depigmentation: no relapse after one year |
| Rao, 2004 | QS alexandrite laser 755 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Case report | 1 patient | Monotherapy | – | Relapse after complete depigmentation: minimal recurrence of pigment |
| Majid, 2013 | Frequency‐doubled QS Nd:YAG laser 532 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Prospective open‐label study | 15 patients / 26 patches | Combination therapy + Topical MBEH |
Percentage achieving ≥90% depigmentation 87.7% of patients | |
| El‐Mofty 2019 | (Frequency‐doubled) QS Nd:YAG laser 1s064/532 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Comparative study | 40 patients | Monotherapy |
Facial: TCA peels 25% and 50% Non‐facial: cryotherapy, phenol 88% |
Excellent/complete depigmentation Facial QSL 90% Non‐facial QSL 95% vs. cryotherapy 90% vs. phenol 100% |
| Majid, 2017 | Frequency‐doubled QS Nd:YAG laser 532 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Retrospective study | 28 patients | Monotherapy | – | Relapse after complete depigmentation: 25% of patients partial to complete relapse |
| Thissen 1997 | QS ruby laser 694 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Open non‐comparative clinical trial | 8 patients | Monotherapy | – | Complete depigmentation in 37.5% of patients |
| Komen 2013 | QS ruby laser 694 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Retrospective study | 27 patients | Monotherapy | – | Percentage achieving ≥75% depigmentation 48% of patients |
| Njoo, 2000 | QS ruby laser 694 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Retrospective study | 13 patients | Combination therapy + topical 4‐methoxyphenol | – |
Complete depigmentation in 69.2% of patients Recurrence of pigmentation in 44.4% of patients |
| Van Geel 2015 | QS alexandrite laser 755 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Retrospective comparative study | 22 patients / 51 patches | Monotherapy | Cryotherapy |
Mean depigmentation after one session Cryotherapy 46.7% QS alexandrite 42.9% |
| Boukari 2014 | QS ruby laser 694 nm / QS alexandrite 755 nm / QS Nd:Yag 532 nm | Vitiligo universalis | Retrospective case series | 6 patients / 16 patches | Monotherapy | – |
Relapse after complete depigmentation 33% of patients/patches no relapse |
≥ 75% of repigmentation was chosen to be presented in Table 1 when different repigmentation thresholds were reported.
P < 0.05.