Literature DB >> 35175362

Return to work after injury in Hong Kong: prospective multi-center cohort study.

Kevin Kei Ching Hung1,2,3, Ling Yan Leung1, Janice Hiu Hung Yeung1,2, Tak Kan Wong1, Tsz Ying Yiu1, Yuk Ki Leung1, Lily Po Shan Chan4, John Kit Shing Wong5, Melissa Po Shan Leung6, William Bernard Goggins3, David Yuen Chung Chan7, Chun Tat Lui5, Wai Kuen Ng6, Hiu Fai Ho4, Chi Hung Cheng1,2, Nai Kwong Cheung1,2, Colin Alexander Graham8,9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Trauma remains a major cause of morbidity and disability worldwide; however, reliable data on the health status of an urban Asian population after injury are scarce. The aim was to evaluate 1-year post-trauma return to work (RTW) status in Hong Kong.
METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center cohort study involving four regional trauma centers from 2017 to 2019 in Hong Kong. Participants included adult patients entered into the trauma registry who were working or seeking employment at the time of injury. The primary outcome was the RTW status up to 1 year. The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, 12-item Short Form (SF-12) survey and EQ5D were also obtained during 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-ups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used for analysis.
RESULTS: Six hundred and seven of the 1115 (54%) recruited patients had RTW during the first year after injury. Lower physical requirements (p = 0.003, HR 1.51) in pre-injury job nature, higher educational levels (p < 0.001, HR 1.95), non-work-related injuries (p < 0.001, HR 1.85), shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.007, HR 0.98), no requirement for surgery (p = 0.006, HR 1.34), and patients who could be discharged home (p = 0.006, HR 1.43) were associated with RTW within 12 months post-injury. In addition, 1-month outcomes including extended Glasgow Outcome Scale ≥ 6 (p = 0.001, HR 7.34), higher mean SF-12 physical component summary (p = 0.002, HR 1.02) and mental component summary (p < 0.001, HR 1.03), and higher EQ5D health index (p = 0.018, HR 2.14) were strongly associated with RTW.
CONCLUSIONS: We have identified factors associated with failure to RTW during the first year following in Hong Kong including socioeconomic factors, injury factors and treatment-related factors and 1-month outcomes. Future studies should focus on the interventions that can impact on RTW outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03219424.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-reported outcome measures; Return to work; Trauma center; Wounds and injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35175362     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01899-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   2.374


  4 in total

Review 1.  Indicators of the quality of trauma care and the performance of trauma systems.

Authors:  R L Gruen; B J Gabbe; H T Stelfox; P A Cameron
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Trajectory of functional outcome and health status after moderate-to-major trauma in Hong Kong: A prospective 5 year cohort study.

Authors:  T H Rainer; K K C Hung; J H H Yeung; S K C Cheung; Y K Leung; L Y Leung; W B Goggins; H F Ho; C W Kam; N K Cheung; C A Graham
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave.

Authors:  Myrthe van Vilsteren; Sandra H van Oostrom; Henrica C W de Vet; Renée-Louise Franche; Cécile R L Boot; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-05

4.  A comparison of functional outcome in patients sustaining major trauma: a multicentre, prospective, international study.

Authors:  Timothy H Rainer; Hiu Hung Yeung; Belinda J Gabbe; Kai Y Yuen; Hiu F Ho; Chak W Kam; Annice Chang; Wai S Poon; Peter A Cameron; Colin A Graham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.