Literature DB >> 35174461

Physiological comparisons among Spathaspora passalidarum, Spathaspora arborariae, and Scheffersomyces stipitis reveal the bottlenecks for their use in the production of second-generation ethanol.

Valquíria Júnia Campos1, Lílian Emídio Ribeiro2, Fernanda Matias Albuini1, Alex Gazolla de Castro1, Patrícia Pereira Fontes1, Wendel Batista da Silveira2, Carlos Augusto Rosa3, Luciano Gomes Fietto4.   

Abstract

The microbial conversion of pentoses to ethanol is one of the major drawbacks that limits the complete use of lignocellulosic sugars. In this study, we compared the yeast species Spathaspora arborariae, Spathaspora passalidarum, and Sheffersomyces stipitis regarding their potential use for xylose fermentation. Herein, we evaluated the effects of xylose concentration, presence of glucose, and temperature on ethanol production. The inhibitory effects of furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), acetic acid, and ethanol were also determined. The highest ethanol yield (0.44 g/g) and productivity (1.02 g/L.h) were obtained using Sp. passalidarum grown in 100 g/L xylose at 32 °C. The rate of xylose consumption was reduced in the presence of glucose for the species tested. Hydroxymethylfurfural did not inhibit the growth of yeasts, whereas furfural extended their lag phase. Acetic acid inhibited the growth and fermentation of all yeasts. Furthermore, we showed that these xylose-fermenting yeasts do not produce ethanol concentrations greater than 4% (v/v), probably due to the inhibitory effects of ethanol on yeast physiology. Our data confirm that among the studied yeasts, Sp. passalidarum is the most promising for xylose fermentation, and the low tolerance to ethanol is an important aspect to be improved to increase its performance for second-generation (2G) ethanol production. Our molecular data showed that this yeast failed to induce the expression of some classical genes involved in ethanol tolerance. These findings suggest that Sp. passalidarum may have not activated a proper response to the stress, impacting its ability to overcome the negative effects of ethanol on the cells.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-fermentation; Ethanol production; Ethanol tolerance; Xylose-fermenting yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35174461      PMCID: PMC9151973          DOI: 10.1007/s42770-022-00693-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.214


  45 in total

Review 1.  Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review.

Authors:  Ye Sun; Jiayang Cheng
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Anaerobic xylose fermentation by Spathaspora passalidarum.

Authors:  X Hou
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Hsp30, the integral plasma membrane heat shock protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a stress-inducible regulator of plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase.

Authors:  P W Piper; C Ortiz-Calderon; C Holyoak; P Coote; M Cole
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  The influence of presaccharification, fermentation temperature and yeast strain on ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse.

Authors:  Carlos J A de Souza; Daniela A Costa; Marina Q R B Rodrigues; Ancély F dos Santos; Mariana R Lopes; Aline B P Abrantes; Patrícia dos Santos Costa; Wendel Batista Silveira; Flávia M L Passos; Luciano G Fietto
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes.

Authors:  A P Gasch; P T Spellman; C M Kao; O Carmel-Harel; M B Eisen; G Storz; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 6.  Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Menggen Ma; Z Lewis Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  HSF and Msn2/4p can exclusively or cooperatively activate the yeast HSP104 gene.

Authors:  Melanie R Grably; Ariel Stanhill; Osnat Tell; David Engelberg
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improvement in stresses tolerance.

Authors:  Nileema R Divate; Gen-Hung Chen; Rupesh D Divate; Bor-Rung Ou; Yun-Chin Chung
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.269

9.  Diversity and physiological characterization of D-xylose-fermenting yeasts isolated from the Brazilian Amazonian Forest.

Authors:  Raquel M Cadete; Monaliza A Melo; Kelly J Dussán; Rita C L B Rodrigues; Silvio S Silva; Jerri E Zilli; Marcos J S Vital; Fátima C O Gomes; Marc-André Lachance; Carlos A Rosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The relationship between lysine 4 on histone H3 methylation levels of alcohol tolerance genes and changes of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hang Wang; Binfeng Ji; Hongzhen Ren; Chun Meng
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.