| Literature DB >> 35174244 |
Yaqi Chang1, Huangyao Tang1, Zhenyu Zhang1,2, Ting Yang1, Bing Wu3, Hua Zhao1, Guangmang Liu1, Xiaoling Chen1, Gang Tian1, Jingyi Cai1, Fali Wu1, Gang Jia1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of zinc methionine (Zn-Met) on the growth performance, antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function of meat ducks. Three hundred and sixty 1-day-old male Cherry Valley ducks were randomly divided into 6 groups with 6 replicates (10 birds each), and fed diets with 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 or 150 mg/kg Zn for 35 d. The results indicated that dietary supplementation with Zn-Met substantially increased the average daily gain (ADG), and reduced the feed to gain ratio (F/G) during 1-35 d (P < 0.05). Dietary Zn-Met markedly increased the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione (GSH), and reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the jejunum (P < 0.05). The mRNA expression levels of critical antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) were increased by Zn in the jejunum (P < 0.05). Supplementation with 60, 90, 120, and 150 mg/kg of Zn significantly reduced the diamine oxidase (DAO) activity in the serum (P < 0.05). Different levels of Zn can increase the mRNA expression of occluding (OCLN) and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) in the jejunum (P < 0.05). Diets supplemented with zinc significantly increased the content of mucin2 (MUC2), secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) in the jejunum of meat ducks (P < 0.05). The 16S rRNA sequence analysis indicated that 150 mg/kg of Zn had a higher relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia and Akkermansia in cecal digesta (P < 0.05). In conclusion, Zn-Met improved the growth performance of meat ducks by enhancing intestinal antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function. This study provides data support for the application of Zn-Met in meat duck breeding.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; growth performance; intestinal barrier; meat duck; zinc methionine (Zn-Met)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174244 PMCID: PMC8841862 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.774160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (%, air-dry basis).
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| ||
| Corn | 61.10 | 67.07 |
| Soybean meal | 34.72 | 27.40 |
| Wheat bran | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| Limestone | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| CaHPO4 | 2.04 | 1.97 |
| NaCl | 0.3 | 0.30 |
| Choline chloride,50% | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| 0.15 | 0.13 | |
| 0.03 | ||
| Mineral premix | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
|
| ||
| AME/(MJ /kg) | 12.14 | 12.15 |
| Crude Protein | 20.00 | 17.51 |
| Ca | 0.90 | 0.85 |
| Available P | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Lys | 1.10 | 0.91 |
| Met | 0.46 | 0.41 |
| Trp | 0.24 | 0.20 |
| Thr | 0.77 | 0.67 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 29.53 | 28.96 |
Mineral premix provided the following per kg of diets: Fe (as Ferrous Sulfate) 80 mg, Cu (as Copper Sulfate) 8 mg, Mn (as Manganese Sulfate) 70 mg, I (as Potassium Iodide) 0.40 mg, Se (as Sodium Selenite) 0.30 mg.
Vitamin premix provided the following per kg of diets: VA 12 000 IU, VD.
Calculated from tables of feed composition and nutritive values provided by feed database in China (2018).
Analyzed Zn concentration of diets (air-dry basis).
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Zn-Met | 0 | 27.96 | 32.49 |
| 30 | 53.60 | 59.85 | |
| 60 | 93.66 | 95.76 | |
| 90 | 117.59 | 119.97 | |
| 120 | 148.45 | 155.20 | |
| 150 | 184.52 | 184.35 | |
Real-time PCR primer sequences.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Forward | CAGGATGTGGCAGAGGAATACAA | 160 |
| Reverse | CCTTGTCGTAGTCGCTCACCAT | |||
|
|
| Forward | ACGCTGGTGAAATCAAGGAAGAA | 255 |
| Reverse | AGGGACATTCAACAGCGTGGC | |||
|
|
| Forward | ACAGTGAAAGAAGCTGGCGTAG | 131 |
| Reverse | GCTGTATTCCCTGCTACGGTC | |||
|
|
| Forward | CAACATCCCTGACATGGAAGACAT | 187 |
| Reverse | TGTGTTCGTGTTGGTTGCGG | |||
|
|
| Forward | TGTTGAATCATCTGCCTGTG | 172 |
| Reverse | TAAGCTAGGTGGTCGAGTGC | |||
|
|
| Forward | GGAGGAGTAGCAGATGTGGAAA | 190 |
| Reverse | AGCACTTGGCTATTCCGATG | |||
|
|
| Forward | CTGTTGAGGAAGCAGGAAGG | 247 |
| Reverse | TCCGCAAAGTAATTGACAGG | |||
|
|
| Forward | AGAAATTGTGCGTGACATCAA | 227 |
| Reverse | GGACTCCATACCCAAGAAAGAT |
Effect of dietary Zn-Met on growth performance of ducks.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| 1 d | 48.05 ± 0.13 | 47.98 ± 0.12 | 48.13 ± 0.13 | 48.18 ± 0.09 | 48.20 ± 0.07 | 47.97 ± 0.07 | 0.479 | 0.753 | 0.414 |
| 14 d | 678.93 ± 13.95 | 678.25 ± 12.90 | 657.17 ± 7.55 | 678.42 ± 12.46 | 669.92 ± 8.98 | 659.58 ± 11.67 | 0.596 | 0.274 | 0.602 |
| 35 d | 2400.85 ± 15.90b | 2547.60 ± 22.07a | 2491.67 ± 39.78ab | 2546.60 ± 42.66a | 2512.50 ± 23.55a | 2520.65 ± 45.15a | 0.042 | 0.271 | 0.269 |
|
| |||||||||
| 1–14 d | 45.06 ± 0.99 | 45.02 ± 0.92 | 43.50 ± 0.54 | 45.02 ± 0.89 | 44.41 ± 0.64 | 43.69 ± 0.84 | 0.594 | 0.268 | 0.595 |
| 15–35 d | 86.10 ± 1.26b | 93.47 ± 1.37a | 91.73 ± 1.82a | 93.42 ± 1.80a | 92.13 ± 1.03a | 93.05 ± 2.27a | 0.029 | 0.192 | 0.198 |
| 1–35 d | 70.60 ± 0.47b | 74.92 ± 0.65a | 73.27 ± 1.17ab | 74.89 ± 1.25a | 73.88 ± 0.69a | 74.12 ± 1.33a | 0.042 | 0.272 | 0.270 |
|
| |||||||||
| 1–14 d | 69.81 ± 1.30 | 70.17 ± 1.42 | 67.61 ± 1.04 | 69.40 ± 1.49 | 67.69 ± 0.91 | 68.40 ± 0.88 | 0.530 | 0.192 | 0.427 |
| 15–35 d | 173.60 ± 4.07 | 178.32 ± 2.48 | 174.39 ± 3.21 | 174.23 ± 3.47 | 175.54 ± 1.79 | 176.85 ± 3.33 | 0.892 | 0.661 | 0.905 |
| 1–35 d | 133.93 ± 1.69 | 136.32 ± 1.66 | 132.96 ± 2.23 | 133.56 ± 2.64 | 133.67 ± 1.23 | 134.70 ± 2.00 | 0.866 | 0.766 | 0.840 |
|
| |||||||||
| 1–14 d | 1.55 ± 0.02 | 1.56 ± 0.02 | 1.55 ± 0.01 | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 1.53 ± 0.02 | 1.57 ± 0.01 | 0.651 | 1.000 | 0.626 |
| 15–35 d | 2.02 ± 0.04 | 1.91 ± 0.01 | 1.90 ± 0.01 | 1.87 ± 0.04 | 1.91 ± 0.01 | 1.90 ± 0.02 | 0.171 | 0.164 | 0.056 |
| 1–35 d | 1.90 ± 0.03a | 1.82 ± 0.01b | 1.81 ± 0.01b | 1.78 ± 0.03b | 1.81 ± 0.01b | 1.82 ± 0.01b | 0.041 | 0.199 | 0.024 |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.
BW, Body weight; ADG, Average daily gain; ADFI, Average daily feed intake; F/G, Feed to gain ratio.
Effect of dietary Zn-Met on the antioxidant status in the intestine of ducks.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| T-AOC (U/mg prot) | 18.92 ± 0.91 | 20.85 ± 0.88 | 21.54 ± 1.23 | 24.03 ± 0.89 | 21.82 ± 1.61 | 21.75 ± 0.79 | 0.069 | 0.178 | 0.085 |
| SOD (U/mg prot) | 50.72 ± 0.93b | 51.02 ± 4.82b | 58.86 ± 4.74ab | 67.78 ± 3.28a | 62.15 ± 3.91ab | 57.38 ± 2.74ab | 0.019 | 0.194 | 0.144 |
| CAT (U/mg prot) | 24.29 ± 1.96c | 23.47 ± 1.15c | 32.96 ± 3.21a | 32.50 ± 1.92ab | 26.23 ± 2.73bc | 23.55 ± 1.51c | 0.006 | 0.925 | 0.217 |
| GSH (mg/g prot) | 48.58 ± 5.28c | 53.79 ± 5.38bc | 77.47 ± 2.61a | 63.95 ± 7.17abc | 71.58 ± 7.40ab | 72.84 ± 8.36ab | 0.017 | 0.085 | 0.170 |
| GSH-Px (U/mg prot) | 25.75 ± 1.31 | 30.49 ± 3.08 | 30.79 ± 2.83 | 37.74 ± 2.61 | 31.43 ± 3.30 | 32.26 ± 1.77 | 0.079 | 0.220 | 0.176 |
| MDA (nmol/mg prot) | 5.63 ± 0.84a | 3.28 ± 0.52b | 3.53 ± 0.57b | 3.30 ± 0.54b | 3.67 ± 0.56b | 2.55 ± 0.36b | 0.021 | 0.090 | 0.207 |
|
| |||||||||
| T-AOC (U/mg prot) | 14.73 ± 1.06 | 13.22 ± 1.09 | 11.28 ± 0.40 | 14.04 ± 1.86 | 12.61 ± 1.50 | 12.19 ± 0.92 | 0.411 | 0.312 | 0.542 |
| SOD (U/mg prot) | 44.94 ± 2.54 | 57.76 ± 3.03 | 50.00 ± 3.61 | 55.09 ± 5.99 | 57.53 ± 4.03 | 60.39 ± 6.11 | 0.125 | 0.081 | 0.273 |
| CAT (U/mg prot) | 23.51 ± 1.64 | 24.62 ± 1.08 | 22.36 ± 1.41 | 24.19 ± 2.39 | 24.97 ± 2.49 | 23.32 ± 2.42 | 0.945 | 0.839 | 0.972 |
| GSH (mg/g prot) | 54.29 ± 3.00 | 63.94 ± 4.09 | 54.40 ± 4.98 | 60.87 ± 2.16 | 59.83 ± 3.20 | 66.36 ± 3.47 | 0.129 | 0.215 | 0.483 |
| GSH-Px (U/mg prot) | 24.38 ± 1.26b | 32.60 ± 1.83a | 27.56 ± 2.23ab | 33.70 ± 2.48a | 33.39 ± 2.96a | 30.05 ± 2.45ab | 0.040 | 0.279 | 0.310 |
| MDA (nmol/mg prot) | 4.59 ± 0.29a | 3.10 ± 0.41bc | 3.16 ± 0.32bc | 3.88 ± 0.44ab | 3.68 ± 0.37ab | 2.13 ± 0.40c | 0.002 | 0.180 | 0.461 |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P <0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.
T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GSH, glutathione; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyd.
Figure 1Effects of Zn-Met on the gene expression of antioxidase activity in jejunum of ducks. CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2.
Figure 2Effects of Zn-Met on gene expression and permeability related to physical barrier of jejunum in meat duck. OCLN, occludin; ZO-1, zonula occludens-1; ZO-2, zonula occludens-2; ZO-3, zonula occludens-3; DAO, diamine oxidase.
Effect of dietary Zn-Met on intestinal mucin content of ducks.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| MUC2 (ng/mL) | 20.37 ± 1.51c | 25.30 ± 1.68b | 25.40 ± 1.16b | 27.60 ± 1.18ab | 30.50 ± 1.40a | 29.76 ± 1.34a | <0.0001 | 0.006 | 0.018 |
|
| |||||||||
| MUC2 (ng/mL) | 14.88 ± 2.03c | 20.25 ± 1.31b | 24.14 ± 1.82ab | 25.52 ± 1.30a | 27.17 ± 1.48a | 25.42 ± 1.46a | <0.0001 | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P <0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.
Effect of dietary Zn-Met on intestinal immunoglobulin content in ducks.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| sIgA (ng/mL) | 31.11 ± 2.28e | 34.53 ± 1.31de | 38.28 ± 2.64cd | 52.01 ± 2.50a | 47.26 ± 2.29ab | 44.50 ± 2.50bc | <0.0001 | 0.059 | 0.097 |
| IgA (ug/mL) | 236.72 ± 8.76d | 272.35 ± 9.99c | 290.50 ± 14.68bc | 334.92 ± 11.71a | 316.70 ± 12.40ab | 309.58 ± 12.24ab | <0.0001 | 0.044 | 0.020 |
| IgG (ug/mL) | 1201.27 ± 86.00d | 1501.70 ± 61.91c | 1722.77 ± 62.90bc | 2005.59 ± 101.84a | 1946.71 ± 126.68ab | 1573.34 ± 88.17c | <0.0001 | 0.189 | 0.023 |
| IgM (ug/mL) | 376.84 ± 19.12b | 345.92 ± 14.07b | 451.18 ± 11.39a | 453.14 ± 19.41a | 469.09 ± 17.21a | 434.95 ± 23.02a | <0.0001 | 0.106 | 0.200 |
|
| |||||||||
| sIgA (ng/mL) | 31.10 ± 1.37b | 34.18 ± 2.31b | 37.30 ± 2.38b | 48.56 ± 1.99a | 45.60 ± 1.95a | 44.00 ± 2.84a | <0.0001 | 0.033 | 0.070 |
| IgA (ug/mL) | 251.06 ± 9.33c | 276.28 ± 10.06bc | 286.26 ± 13.24b | 340.84 ± 11.96a | 357.40 ± 12.13a | 300.99 ± 11.23b | <0.0001 | 0.101 | 0.129 |
| IgG (ug/mL) | 1123.18 ± 111.79b | 1284.79 ± 93.32b | 1634.23 ± 67.33a | 1859.03 ± 87.79a | 1834.67 ± 98.46a | 1674.20 ± 98.47a | <0.0001 | 0.043 | 0.016 |
| IgM (ug/mL) | 336.46 ± 16.96c | 377.43 ± 11.52bc | 397.25 ± 16.17b | 479.00 ± 32.17a | 471.66 ± 14.99a | 406.73 ± 12.06b | 0.001 | 0.126 | 0.089 |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.
SlgA, Secretory immunoglobulin A; IgA, Immunoglobulin A; IgG, Immunoglobulin G; IgM, Immunoglobulin M.
Figure 3Summary of bacterial taxa in duck cecal digesta observed by concentration of Zn-Met in the diet. (A) The dilution curve was constructed according to the number of randomly selected sequences and the number of observed features. (B) PCA among three groups based on Weighted UniFrac distances. Each point represented a sample. (C) Depicts phylum level classifications for observed features. (D) Depicts genus level classifications for observed features.
Effect of dietary Zn-Met on the diversity of cecal digesta microbiota in ducks.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Chao1 | 768.63 ± 73.46 | 665.64 ± 105.91 | 668.95 ± 134.92 | 692.66 ± 141.91 | 762.17 ± 52.73 | 709.89 ± 80.45 | 0.97 |
| Shannon | 7.17 ± 0.22 | 6.84 ± 0.26 | 7.12 ± 0.16 | 7.04 ± 0.35 | 7.09 ± 0.21 | 7.11 ± 0.22 | 0.95 |
| Simpson | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.004 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.91 |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P <0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.
The relative abundance at the phylum level of cecal microbe.
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 52.26 | 49.67 | 50.79 | 44.20 | 50.48 | 49.73 | 1.07 | 0.366 |
|
| 33.56 | 36.18 | 32.47 | 31.32 | 24.09 | 32.50 | 3.22 | 0.247 |
|
| 6.39 | 6.55 | 7.85 | 11.00 | 11.87 | 8.06 | 0.67 | 0.067 |
|
| 4.22 | 2.83 | 2.47 | 9.62 | 5.84 | 4.04 | 1.09 | 0.450 |
|
| 2.11 | 3.82 | 5.33 | 2.82 | 6.32 | 3.78 | 0.60 | 0.350 |
|
| 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.651 |
|
| 0.15b | 0.08b | 0.04b | 0.06b | 0.08b | 1.03a | 0.10 | 0.018 |
|
| 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.700 |
|
| 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.483 |
|
| 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.223 |
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.
The optimal dietary Zn-Met supplementation based on different indices for ducks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F/G (g:g) | y = 1.210E – 5x2 – 0.002x + 1.892 | 0.916 | <0.05 | 83.33 |
| IgA of content in jejunum(ng/mL) | y = −0.007x2 + 1.585x + 233.381 | 0.925 | <0.05 | 113.21 |
| IgG of content in jejunum (ng/mL) | y = −0.089x2 + 16.672x + 1142.930 | 0.920 | <0.05 | 93.70 |
| IgG of content in ileum (ng/mL) | y = −0.062x2 + 13.652x + 1052.811 | 0.936 | <0.05 | 110.10 |
y Is the Dependent Variable and x Are the Dietary Zn Supplemental Levels (mg/kg).
Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P <0.05) as determined by ANOVA and Duncan's test.