| Literature DB >> 35174218 |
Cássia da Luz Goulart1, Flávia Rossi Caruso1, Adriana Sanches Garcia de Araújo1, Sílvia Cristina Garcia de Moura2, Aparecida Maria Catai2, Piergiuseppe Agostoni3, Renata Gonçalves Mendes1, Ross Arena4, Audrey Borghi-Silva1.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on (1) metabolic, ventilatory, and hemodynamic responses; and (2) cerebral (Cox), respiratory, and peripheral oxygenation when compared with SHAM ventilation during the high-intensity exercise in patients with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: COPD; blood flow muscle; cardiovascular physiology; heart failure; oxygen consumption
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174218 PMCID: PMC8841720 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.772650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Protocol of our ventilation study adapted with the gas analysis measured breath-by-breath in which the trachea was connected with the pneumotach.
Figure 2Flow diagram representing the sample recruitment and loss.
Effects of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and SHAM ventilation on selected metabolic, ventilatory, and cardiovascular/hemodynamics at exercise cessation [peak of constant load exercise (CLE)] (N = 14).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| IPAP, cmH2O | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
| EPAP, cmH2O | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0 | <0.001 |
| Tlim, s | 129 ± 29 | 98 ± 29 | 0.015 |
| WR, W | 44 ± 17 | - | - |
|
| |||
| 1,278 ± 581 | 903 ± 573 | 0.016 | |
| 18 ± 8 | 12 ± 7 | 0.008 | |
| 1,105 ± 483 | 773 ± 433 | 0.015 | |
| 33 ± 11 | 24 ± 12 | 0.009 | |
|
| |||
| Heart rate, bpm | |||
| Δ peak—rest, bpm | 37 ± 6 | 34 ± 5 | 0.588 |
| Δ peak −1′ recovery, bpm | 19 ± 4 | 19 ± 5 | 0.937 |
| SpO2 peak, % | 94.7 ± 3.5 | 92.7 ± 5.2 | 0.038 |
| SBP peak, mmHg | 158 ± 27 | 155 ± 16 | 0.512 |
| DBP peak, mmHg | 86 ± 15 | 83 ± 15 | 0.413 |
|
| |||
| Peak, mmol/l | 3.3 ± 1.0 | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 0.734 |
| Lactate/time, mmol/s | 43 ± 17 | 33 ± 16 | 0.028 |
| Borg dyspnea peak | 3 (1) | 4 (1) | 0.305 |
| Borg fatigue peak | 3 (1) | 4 (2) | 0.335 |
NIPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HF, heart failure; SpO.
Figure 3Comparison between HR and cardiac output during ventilation and NIPPV. Heart rate (HR); non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV); (A) HR peak. (B) cardiac output. Student's t-test.
Figure 4Comparative analysis of the effects of NIPPV (closed symbols) and SHAM ventilation (open symbols) on Cox, respiratory, and peripheral muscle oxygenation. During high-intensity exercise (N = 14). (A) (OxyHb+Mb) cerebral p interaction: 0.87; (B) (OxyHb+Mb) peripheral muscle (vastus lateralis muscle) p interaction: 0.10; (C) (OxyHb+Mb) respiratory muscle (intercostal muscle) p interaction: 0.79; (D) (DeoxyHb+Mb) cerebral p interaction: 0.03; (E) (DeoxyHb+Mb) peripheral muscle (right vastus lateralis muscle) p interaction: 0.79; (F) (DeoxyHb+Mb) respiratory muscle (intercostal muscle) p interaction < 0.01. *p < 0.05 100% NIPPV vs. 20–40% NIPPV; α100% SHAM vs. 60–80% NIPPV; #100% NIPPV vs. 100% SHAM. Two-way variance analysis with Bonferroni post-hoc.
Figure 5A comparative analysis in Cox, peripheral, and respiratory muscle during rest and limit of tolerance (Tlim) (SHAM 98 s and NIPPV 129 s). *p < 0.05, ANOVA two-way. (A) (OxyHb+Mb) cerebral; (B) (OxyHb+Mb) peripheral muscle (vastus lateralis muscle); (C) (OxyHb+Mb) respiratory muscle (intercostal muscle); (D) (DeoxyHb+Mb) cerebral p interaction: 0.03; (E) (DeoxyHb+Mb) respiratory muscle (intercostal muscle); (F) (DeoxyHb+Mb) peripheral muscle (right vastus lateralis muscle).
Cerebral, respiratory, and peripheral ΔOxyHb+Mb and ΔDeoxyHb+Mb values during high-intensity exercise in patients with COPD-HF.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 20% | −0.26 ± 0.89 | 1.15 ± 0.23 | −0.33 ± 0.49 | 1.02 ± 0.21 |
| 40% | −1.27 ± 0.60 | 1.53 ± 0.29 | −2.22 ± 0.71 | 1.83 ± 0.30 |
| 60% | −2.61 ± 0.41 | 2.38 ± 0.31 | −3.50 ± 0.61 | 2.84 ± 0.27 |
| 80% | −3.55 ± 0.45 | 3.13 ± 0.27 | −4.33 ± 0.58 | 3.91 ± 0.30 |
| 100% | −4.41 ± 0.55 | 4.11 ± 0.35 | −5.53 ± 0.76 | 4.89 ± 0.38 |
|
| ||||
| 20% | 0.53 ± 0.36 | 1.22 ± 0.29 | −0.62 ± 0.27 | 1.77 ± 0.36 |
| 40% | −1.05 ± 0.41 | 2.36 ± 0.20 | −1.60 ± 0.33 | 3.08 ± 0.40 |
| 60% | −2.27 ± 0.31 | 3.22 ± 0.20 | −3.10 ± 0.28 | 4.72 ± 0.82 |
| 80% | −2.97 ± 0.40 | 4.01 ± 0.25 | −4.01 ± 0.34 | 5.90 ± 0.86 |
| 100% | −3.53 ± 0.49 | 4.95 ± 0.28 | −4.71 ± 0.24 | 6.98 ± 0.87 |
|
| ||||
| 20% | −0.33 ± 0.25 | 1.03 ± 0.22 | −0.87 ± 0.32 | 1.22 ± 0.41 |
| 40% | −1.23 ± 0.23 | 2.32 ± 0.31 | −3.08 ± 0.57 | 3.15 ± 0.49 |
| 60% | −2.55 ± 0.29 | 3.59 ± 0.53 | −4.76 ± 0.57 | 5.30 ± 0.73 |
| 80% | −3.86 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.52 | −6.05 ± 0.59 | 6.73 ± 0.69 |
| 100% | −5.04 ± 0.34 | 5.64 ± 0.56 | −6.90 ± 1.13 | 8.94 ± 0.75 |
100% SHAM vs. 60–80% NIPPV.
100% NIPPV vs. 100% SHAM.
Two-way variance analysis with Bonferroni post-hoc. The deltas of the variables were analyzed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) at the cerebral, peripheral, and respiratory muscles were calculated during CLE, in seconds, divided into deltas [20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of limit of tolerance (Tlim)], subtracted from the value obtained at rest (60 s of the most stable data).