| Literature DB >> 35174195 |
Xiaoqin Luo1, Wanyu Zhang1,2, Zhangya He1, Hexiang Yang1, Jiayi Gao1,3, Pei Wu1, Zheng Feei Ma4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide. Dietary vitamin C intake might play an important role in reducing the risk of NAFLD. This study assesses the relationship between dietary vitamin C intake and diagnostic biomarkers of NAFLD.Entities:
Keywords: CHNS; NAFLD; ascorbic acid; dietary; vitamin C
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174195 PMCID: PMC8841761 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.779912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Flowchart of study participants.
General characteristics of the participants.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30.6 ± 11.3 | 57.8 ± 6.5 | 83.3 ± 8.7 | 147.4 ± 77.3 | |
|
| 52.22 ± 16.40 | 49.82 ± 15.08 | 50.18 ± 14.55 | 50.12 ± 14.07 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Male | 891 (42.9%) | 939 (45.2%) | 1,002 (48.2%) | 1,047 (50.4%) | <0.001 |
| Female | 1,185 (57.1%) | 1,138 (54.8%) | 1,075 (51.8%) | 1,030 (49.6%) | |
|
| 160.32 ± 8.62 | 161.18 ± 8.60 | 161.34 ± 8.53 | 161.40 ± 8.49 | <0.001 |
|
| 60.34 ± 11.51 | 60.91 ± 11.36 | 60.98 ± 11.22 | 61.11 ± 11.09 | 0.133 |
|
| |||||
| <18.5 kg/m2 | 147 (7.1%) | 131 (6.3%) | 138 (6.6%) | 106 (5.1%) | 0.341 |
| 18.5~23.9 kg/m2 | 1,101 (53.0%) | 1,102 (53.1%) | 1,102 (53.1%) | 1,150 (55.4%) | |
| 24.0~27.9 kg/m2 | 616 (29.7%) | 634 (30.5%) | 634 (30.5%) | 628 (30.2%) | |
| ≥28.0 kg/m2 | 212 (10.2%) | 210 (10.1%) | 203 (9.8%) | 193 (9.3%) | |
|
| 83.25 ± 10.63 | 82.56 ± 10.44 | 82.54 ± 10.11 | 82.61 ± 10.26 | 0.083 |
|
| 94.44 ± 8.10 | 94.36 ± 7.99 | 94.32 ± 7.79 | 94.78 ± 7.65 | 0.212 |
|
| |||||
| Urban | 597 (28.8%) | 592 (28.5%) | 711 (34.2%) | 819 (39.4%) | <0.001 |
| Rural | 1,479 (71.2%) | 1,485 (71.5%) | 1,366 (65.8%) | 1,258 (60.6%) | |
|
| |||||
| Never | 1,467 (70.7%) | 1,458 (70.2%) | 1,410 (67.9%) | 1,398 (67.3%) | 0.133 |
| Former | 67 (3.2%) | 70 (3.4%) | 62 (3.0%) | 74 (3.6%) | |
| Current | 541 (26.1%) | 548 (26.4%) | 604 (29.1%) | 604 (29.1%) | |
Estimation mean (95% CI) of biomarkers of liver function according to dietary vitamin C intake (mg) among adults.
|
| |||||
|
| 151.6 (144.1, 159.1) | 142.7 (135.2, 150.2) | 140.5 (133.0, 148.0) | 129.0 (121.5, 136.5) | 0.001 |
|
| 142.1 (132.0, 152.2) | 133.2 (123.2, 143.3) | 131.0 (121.0, 141.1) | 119.5 (109.5, 129.5) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 286.4 (284.1, 288.8) | 289.3 (287.4, 292.1) | 286.4 (284.0, 288.7) | 287.7 (285.4, 290.0) | 0.265 |
|
| 286.3 (283.1, 292.3) | 289.1 (286.0, 292.3) | 286.4 (283.3, 290.0) | 287.8 (284.6, 290.9) | 0.293 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1.45 (1.42, 1.48) | 1.47 (1.44, 1.50) | 1.46 (1.42, 1.49) | 1.50 (1.46, 1.52) | 0.148 |
|
| 1.42 (1.38, 1.46) | 1.44 (1.40, 1.48) | 1.43 (1.39, 1.47) | 1.48 (1.44, 1.52) | 0.056 |
|
| |||||
|
| 23.13 (22.34, 23.92) | 23.14 (22.35, 23.93) | 23.39 (22.60, 24.18) | 22.69 (21.91, 23.49) | 0.671 |
|
| 22.03 (20.98, 23.08) | 22.00 (22.95, 23.04) | 22.38 (21.33, 23.42) | 21.65 (20.62, 22.69) | 0.639 |
|
| |||||
|
| 74.79 (74.56, 75.01) | 74.96 (74.74, 75.19) | 74.92 (74.69, 75.14) | 74.58 (74.36, 74.81) | 0.089 |
|
| 74.77 (74.46, 75.08) | 74.94 (74.63, 75.24) | 74.90 (74.60, 75.21) | 74.56 (74.25, 74.86) | 0.078 |
|
| |||||
|
| 44.84 (44.69, 44.98) | 45.06 (44.92, 45.20) | 45.23 (45.09, 45.37) | 45.25 (45.11, 45.39) | <0.001 |
|
| 44.93 (44.74, 45.12) | 45.15 (44.96, 45.34) | 45.28 (45.09, 45.47) | 45.26 (45.07, 45.45) | 0.002 |
Model 1 was adjusted for dietary vitamin C intake, age and gender; Model 2 was adjusted for Model 1 variables in addition to body mass index (BMI), residence, and smoking status.
Figure 2Adjusted Ferritin by dietary vitamin C intake, gender (A), residence (B), age (C), and body mass index (BMI) (D). Values were means adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking status, and residence.
Estimation mean (95% CI) of biomarkers of glucose/lipid metabolism according to dietary vitamin C intake (mg) among adults.
|
| |||||
|
| 5.69 (5.65, 5.73) | 5.63 (5.59, 5.67) | 5.61 (5.58, 5.65) | 5.58 (5.55, 5.62) | 0.001 |
|
| 5.69 (5.66, 5.73) | 5.63 (5.59, 5.66) | 5.61 (5.58, 5.65) | 5.58 (5.54, 5.62) | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
|
| 5.40 (5.34, 5.46) | 5.36 (5.29, 5.42) | 5.42 (5.36, 5.48) | 5.29 (5.23, 5.35) | 0.014 |
|
| 5.35 (5.26, 5.43) | 5.30 (5.22, 5.38) | 5.36 (5.28, 5.45) | 5.22 (5.14, 5.30) | 0.005 |
|
| |||||
|
| 4.89 (4.85, 4.93) | 4.87 (4.82, 4.91) | 4.88 (4.84, 4.92) | 4.83 (4.78, 4.87) | 0.186 |
|
| 4.88 (4.82, 4.94) | 4.86 (4.80, 4.92) | 4.87 (4.82, 4.93) | 4.82 (4.76, 4.87) | 0.149 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1.55 (1.49, 1.61) | 1.63 (1.57, 1.69) | 1.61 (1.55, 1.67) | 1.58 (1.52, 1.63) | 0.230 |
|
| 1.53 (1.45, 1.61) | 1.61 (1.53, 1.69) | 1.60 (1.52, 1.67) | 1.56 (1.48, 1.63) | 0.187 |
|
| |||||
|
| 1.45 (1.43, 1.47) | 1.42 (1.40, 1.44) | 1.42 (1.40, 1.44) | 1.45 (1.43, 1.47) | 0.071 |
|
| 1.43 (1.40, 1.46) | 1.40 (1.37, 1.43) | 1.40 (1.38, 1.43) | 1.43 (1.40, 1.46) | 0.043 |
|
| |||||
|
| 3.01 (2.97, 3.05) | 2.98 (2.94, 3.02) | 2.98 (2.94, 3.02) | 2.94 (2.90, 2.98) | 0.206 |
|
| 3.00 (2.94, 3.06) | 2.98 (2.92, 3.03) | 2.97 (2.92, 3.03) | 2.94 (2.88, 2.99) | 0.196 |
Model 1 was adjusted for dietary vitamin C intake, age and gender; Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 variables in addition to BMI, residence, and smoking status.
Figure 3Adjusted hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) by dietary vitamin C intake, gender (A), residence (B), age (C), and BMI (D). Values were means adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking status, and residence.