| Literature DB >> 35174165 |
Ao Ma1, Aurang Zeb1, Imtiaz Ali1, Daren Zhao1, Asad Khan1, Beibei Zhang1, Jianteng Zhou1, Ranjha Khan1, Huan Zhang1, Yuanwei Zhang1, Ihsan Khan1, Wasim Shah1, Haider Ali1, Abdul Rafay Javed1, Hui Ma1, Qinghua Shi1.
Abstract
Multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella (MMAF) can lead to male infertility due to impaired sperm motility and morphology. Calmodulin- and spoke-associated complex (CSC) are known for their roles in radial spoke (RS) assembly and ciliary motility in Chlamydomonas, while the role of cilia- and flagella-associated protein 61 (CFAP61), a mammalian ortholog of the CSC subunits, in humans is yet unknown. Here, we recruited three unrelated Pakistani families comprising of 11 infertile male patients diagnosed with MMAF. CFAP61 variants, c.451_452del (p.I151Nfs*4) in family 1 and c.847C > T (p.R283*) in family 2 and 3, were identified recessively co-segregating with the MMAF phenotype. Transmission electron microscopy analyses revealed severe disorganized axonemal ultrastructures, and missings of central pair, RSs, and inner dynein arms were also observed and confirmed by immunofluorescence staining in spermatozoa from patients. CFAP61 and CFAP251 signals were absent from sperm tails of the patients, which suggested the loss of functional CSC in sperm flagella. Altogether, our findings report that homozygous variants in CFAP61 are associated with MMAF and male infertility, demonstrating the essential role of this gene in normal sperm flagellum structure in humans.Entities:
Keywords: Cfap61; calmodulin- and spoke-associated complex; central pair; male infertility; multiple morphological abnormalities of flagella
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174165 PMCID: PMC8841411 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.803818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1CFAP61 variants identified in three Pakistani families with MMAF. (A) Pedigrees of family 1 with four infertile patients, P1 (II:2), P2 (II:5), P3 (II:6), and P4 (II:7), family 2 with four infertile patients, P5 (II:3), P6 (II:4), P7 (II:5), and P8 (II:6) and family 3 with three infertile patients, P9 (IV:1), P10 (IV:2), and P11 (IV:3). Arrows point to the individuals for which whole-exome sequencing was performed. Slashes denote deceased family members, double slash means divorce, and double horizontal lines represent consanguineous marriage. (B) Representative SEM micrographs showing sperm morphological abnormalities observed in patients, including absent (ii), short (iii), coiled (iv), bent (v) flagella, and flagella of irregular caliber (vi). A representative spermatozoon with normal morphology from the fertile control was shown (i). Scale bars represent 4 μm. (C–E) Verification of the CFAP61 variants, p. I151Nfs*13 (NC_000020.10:g. 20056144-200156145del) in family 1 (C) and p. R283* (NC_000020.10:g. 20079446C > T) in family 2 (D) and family 3 (E) by Sanger sequencing using genomic DNA from all the available family members. Arrowheads, the mutation sites. F, female; M, male. WT, wild-type allele. MT, the mutant allele. M1, c.451_452del. M2, c.847C > T. (F) The positions of the two variants in CFAP61 at transcript level (NM_015585.4) and protein level (NP_056400.3).
Clinical characteristics of patients.
| Reference values | Family 1 | Family 2 | Family 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | ||
| cDNA mutation | — | M1/M1 | M1/M1 | M1/M1 | M1/M1 | M2/M2 | M2/M2 | M2/M2 | M2/M2 | M2/M2 | M2/M2 | WT/M2 |
| Age (y) | — | 51 | 44 | 41 | 37 | 39 | 35 | 31 | 29 | 40 | 36 | 38 |
| Age (y) of marriage | — | 19/25/39 | 30 | 28 | 27 | 23 | 20 | 18 | 21 | 29 | 28 | 30 |
| Height/weight (cm/kg) | — | 171.0/70.0 | 174.0/60.0 | 167.6/80.0 | 162.6/75.0 | 160.0/55.0 | 180.0/67.0 | 174.0/59.0 | 153.0/65.0 | 179.8/70.0 | 170.2/70.0 | 170.2/70.0 |
| Semen parameters | ||||||||||||
| Semen volume (ml) | >1.5 | 2.0 ± 0 | 1.0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 ± 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Sperm concentration (106/ml) | >15 | 73.0 ± 5.7 | 55.0 ± 20.0 | 6.0 ± 4.0 | 49.0 ± 29.0 | 27.8 ± 12.3 | 41.0 | 27.0 ± 15.0 | 47.0 | 26.3 ± 5.2 | 65.0 ± 17.6 | 20.0 |
| Semen pH | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline | Alkaline |
| Normal sperm morphology (%) | >4 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.4 | ND | ND |
| Motile sperm (%) | >40 | 36.7 ± 1.7 | 26.0 ± 4.0 | 24.0 ± 4.0 | 15.5 ± 9.5 | 31.5 ± 13.5 | 45.0 | 33.5 ± 6.5 | 65.0 | 36.3 ± 6.6 | 41.7 ± 9.3 | 45.0 |
| Progressively motile sperm (%) | >32 | 16.7 ± 1.7 | 13.5 ± 1.5 | 13.0 ± 5.0 | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 23.5 ± 11.5 | 30.0 | 22.5 ± 7.5 | 45.0 | 21.3 ± 3.8 | 25.0 ± 5.0 | 25.0 |
| Sperm flagella | ||||||||||||
| Morphologically normal (%) | — | 13.2 | 3.1 | 10.9 | 17.8 | 7.2 | 9.1 ± 5.1 | 10.0 ± 1.4 | 9.3 | 16.2 | ND | ND |
| Absent (%) | — | 4.8 | 3.5 | 9.8 | 1.6 | 8.5 | 10.7 ± 4.7 | 6.9 ± 5.7 | 1.7 | 4.7 | ND | ND |
| Short (%) | — | 13.2 | 12.9 | 21.9 | 12.4 | 11.5 | 20.0 ± 1.0 | 15.5 ± 0.9 | 16.2 | 16.8 | ND | ND |
| Coiled (%) | — | 21.3 | 45.0 | 21.5 | 16.4 | 28.0 | 10.5 ± 1.0 | 23.1 ± 1.9 | 31.4 | 17.0 | ND | ND |
| Bent (%) | — | 22.8 | 9.4 | 14.4 | 18.6 | 17.8 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 19.1 ± 5.4 | 9.7 | 18.5 | ND | ND |
| Irregular caliber (%) | — | 24.7 | 26.1 | 21.5 | 33.2 | 27.0 | 35.2 ± 1.8 | 25.4 ± 0.9 | 31.7 | 26.8 | ND | ND |
Data with more than one experiments are presented as mean ± SEM., Reference values are shown according to WHO (the fifth edition).
Ages represents current age at submission (2021). M1, c.451_452del. M2, c.847C > T. ND, not determined.
FIGURE 2Ultrastructural flagellar abnormalities and flagellar protein defects in patients. (A) Representative TEM micrographs showing cross sections of midpiece (i and iv), principal piece (ii and v), and end piece (iii and vi), of sperm flagella from a fertile control and patients. Scale bars represent 100 nm. (B) Cross-sections showing the rotated central pairs (CPs) from patients. Red dash lines represent the expected direction of CPs, predicted from the position of longitudinal columns. Green dash lines show the observed direction of CPs, which has an angle with the expected direction (red dash line) in patients. (C–E) Representative images of spermatozoa from a fertile control and P7 co-stained by anti-α-Tubulin antibodies and anti-SPAG6 antibodies (C), anti-TSGA2 antibodies (D), or anti-DNAH1 antibodies (E). Representative flagella with relatively normal, weak, or absent DNAH1 signals in spermatozoa from P7 were shown in (E). Scale bars represent 10 μm.
Percentage of abnormal cross-sections in patients.
| Midpiece | Principal piece | End piece | Misoriented CP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 50.0% (n = 2) | 50.0% (n = 10) | 66.7% (n = 9) | 0 (n = 9) |
| P2 | Not observed (n = 0) | 85.6% (n = 13) | 91.8% (n = 12) | 25.0% (n = 4) |
| P3 | Not observed (n = 0) | 85.6% (n = 13) | 40.0% (n = 15) | 16.7% (n = 6) |
| P4 | 33.3% (n = 3) | 42.9% (n = 7) | 42.9% (n = 7) | 9.1% (n = 11) |
| P5 | 75.0% (n = 4) | 71.9% (n = 32) | 71.4% (n = 7) | 7.7% (n = 13) |
| P6 | 87.5% (n = 7) | 89.8% (n = 40) | 90.0% (n = 28) | 44.4% (n = 18) |
| P8 | 33.3% (n = 9) | 65.3% (n = 72) | 82.8% (n = 29) | 10.0% (n = 40) |
| P9 | 100.0% (n = 9) | 83.9% (n = 31) | 71.4% (n = 14) | 25.0% (n = 12) |
| Average (mean ± SD) | 63.2 ± 28.4% (n = 34) | 71.9 ± 17.7% (n = 218) | 69.4 ± 21.1% (n = 121) | 17.2 ± 13.9% (n = 113) |
For analyzing the percentage of cross-sections with misoriented central pair (CP), all the cross-sections (regardless of midpiece, principal piece, or end piece) with an identifiable “9 + 2” axoneme conformation in each patient were scored. n, indicates the number of cross-sections scored.
FIGURE 3CSC proteins were not observed in sperm flagella of patients. Representative images of spermatozoa from a fertile control, P1, and P7 co-stained by anti-α-Tubulin antibodies and anti-CFAP61 antibodies (A) or anti-CFAP251 antibodies (B). Scale bars represent 10 μm.