| Literature DB >> 35174110 |
Yimao Zhang1, Qi Wang1, Siyu Pu1, Junxiang Wang2, Bo Xiang1, Juxian Liu3, Shuguang Jin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The failed clearance of jaundice (CJ) in patients with biliary atresia (BA) after the Kasai procedure (KP) often leads to a shorter native liver survival (NLS) time and earlier liver transplantation. We aimed to investigate risk factors of failed CJ and establish a novel nomogram model to predict the status of CJ.Entities:
Keywords: Kasai; biliary atresia; clearance of jaundice; nomogram; prediction model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174110 PMCID: PMC8841871 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.837247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Figure 1The work flow of this study.
The baseline characteristics of patients in training and testing cohorts.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at surgery (days) | 64.3 ± 17.8 | 65.9 ± 18.8 | 0.68 | |
| Gender | Male | 54 | 27 | 0.61 |
| Female | 66 | 28 | ||
| Weight (kg) | 5.0 ± 0.9 | 5.1 ± 1.0 | 0.57 | |
| Clearance of jaundice | 83 | 37 | 0.80 | |
| Surgical methods | Open | 57 | 32 | 0.19 |
| Laparoscope | 63 | 23 |
Characteristic of the patients and univariate analysis in training and testing cohort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery days, mean ± SD | 61.2 ± 20.0 | 68.2 ± 19.3 | 0.03 | 63.81 ± 18.9 | 69.8 ± 19.2 | 0.04 |
| Male | 38 | 16 | 0.79 | 17 | 10 | 0.50 |
| Weight (kg), mean ± SD | 5.0 ± 1.0 | 5.1 ± 0.6 | 0.55 | 5.1 ± 1.1 | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 0.67 |
| CMV IgM + ve associated BA (%) | 15 (18.1%) | 19 (51.4%) | <0.001 | 6 (16.2%) | 8 (44.4%) | 0.02 |
| Laparoscope Kasai | 42 | 21 | 0.53 | 17 | 6 | 0.37 |
| TBIL (umol/L), mean | 170.5 (91.8–351.5) | 181.7 (110.0–458.8) | 0.84 | 175.8 (92.9–263.7) | 189.2 (126.5–422.1) | 0.69 |
| ALT (IU/L), mean | 152 (25–557) | 181 (26–542) | 0.50 | 158 (31–529) | 189 (36–522) | 0.45 |
| AST (IU/L), mean | 298 (100–2,228) | 344 (95–1,546) | 0.55 | 274 (103–1,980) | 336 (102–1,374) | 0.29 |
| Albumin (g/L), mean ± SD | 40.3 ± 3.8 | 40.7 ± 4.4 | 0.55 | 39.8 ± 2.9 | 41.4 ± 4.1 | 0.47 |
| In (ALP), mean ± SD | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 0.73 | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 6.3 ± 0.5 | 0.12 |
| TBA (umol/L), mean ± SD | 156.0 ± 36.0 | 148.3 ± 38.8 | 0.39 | 148.1 ± 31.1 | 150.3 ± 32.4 | 0.64 |
| In (GGT), mean ± SD | 6.3 ± 0.8 | 5.7 ± 0.8 | <0.001 | 6.2 ± 0.6 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| INR, mean | 1.1 (0.79–4.9) | 1.2 (0.84–4.08) | 0.84 | 1.2 (0.81–3.2) | 1.4 (0.94–4.01) | 0.73 |
| PT, mean | 13.2 (9.5–58.6) | 14.3 (10.3–44.9) | 0.20 | 12.5 (9.8–42.5) | 13.9 (10.4–51.7) | 0.64 |
| Other malformations | 34 | 10 | 0.20 | 12 | 5 | 0.72 |
| Thickness of fibrous portal plate (mm), mean ± SD | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 1.1 | <0.001 | 5.5 ± 1.0 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | <0.001 |
| LSM (kPa), mean ± SD | 11.3 ± 4.2 | 15.3 ± 5.4 | <0.001 | 10.6 ± 3.9 | 16.3 ± 5.2 | 0.003 |
|
| ||||||
| F1–F3 | 50 | 14 | 0.02 | 21 | 7 | 0.21 |
| F4 | 33 | 23 | 16 | 11 | ||
| Blood loss (ml), mean | 24.0 (5–100) | 27.4 (5–60) | 0.28 | 26.2 (5–70) | 26.8 (5–100) | 0.73 |
| Multiple episodes of cholangitis, mean | 1.2 (0–4) | 2.4 (0–5) | <0.001 | 1.1 (0–3) | 2.0 (0–4) | 0.03 |
CJ, cleared jaundice; UJ, uncleared jaundice; CMV, cytomegalovirus; TBIL, total bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TBA, total bile acid; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; INR, international normalized ratio; PT, prothrombin time; LSM, liver stiffness measurement.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to construct nomogram in training cohort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMV IgM + ve associated BA | 1.22 | 3.38 | 1.01–11.32 | 0.04 |
| Surgery days | −0.01 | 0.98 | 0.95–0.12 | 0.53 |
| In (GGT) | −0.88 | 0.41 | 0.22–0.80 | 0.009 |
| Thickness of fibrous portal plate | −0.80 | 0.45 | 0.27–0.76 | 0.003 |
| LSM | 0.18 | 1.19 | 1.06–1.34 | 0.002 |
| Metavir score | 0.73 | 2.08 | 0.66–6.59 | 0.21 |
| Multiple episodes of cholangitis | 0.50 | 1.65 | 1.13–2.41 | 0.01 |
CMV, cytomegalovirus; BA, biliary atresia; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; LSM, liver stiffness measurement.
Figure 2The nomogram for prediction the possibility of unsuccessful CJ in patients with KP. (Each clinical factor with different status would correspond to a score in “Point”. The scores for each clinical factor were added to obtain an overall score in “Total point”. Then, “Total point” would correspond to risk of “Probability of unsuccessful CJ”.) CMV, cytomegalovirus; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; LSM, liver stiffness measurement; CJ, clearance of jaundice; BA, biliary atresia; KP, Kasai procedure.
Figure 3The receive operating characteristic of established model in training (A) and testing cohort (B).