Literature DB >> 35174061

Delayed-type drug eruption to phenazopyridine (pyridium) confirmed with patch testing.

Winnie W Y Yeung1, Christina S M Wong2, Wai-Yan Leung1, Philip H Li1.   

Abstract

Delayed hypersensitivity reaction of penicillin is commonly seen, but never reported in pyridium. This case illustrates a patient with delayed hypersensitivity reaction after the use of augmentin and pyridium. Skin patch test, surprisingly, confirmed pyridium delayed hypersensitivity.
Copyright © 2022. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypersensitivity; Penicillin; Phenazopyridine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35174061      PMCID: PMC8819419          DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy        ISSN: 2233-8276


INTRODUCTION

Phenazopyridine (pyridium) is an analgesic commonly used for symptomatic relief of dysuria. It has a good safety profile and often prescribed in combination with antibiotics for treatment of urinary tract infections. Commonly described adverse drug reactions of phenazopyridine include discoloration of urine, methemoglobinemia, haemolytic anemia, skin discoloration, and interstitial nephritis; but allergic reactions have rarely been reported [12]. We report the first case of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction presenting as an exanthematous drug eruption after concomitant use of amoxicillin-clavulanate (AC) and phenazopyridine.

CASE REPORT

A 49-year-old lady with known psoriasis, in remission while on regular infliximab infusion, suffered from a urinary tract infection. She was not on any other medications. The patient was prescribed a course of oral AC 1 g twice daily and phenazopyridine 200 mg thrice-daily by her family physician. One day after, she developed a maculopapular exanthem distributed over her face, neck, trunk and progressed to involve four limbs on subsequent days (Fig. 1). There was no mucosal involvement, conjunctivitis, eosinophilia, internal organ involvement, or other features of a severe cutaneous adverse reaction. The patient declined a skin biopsy and was diagnosed with a suspected delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to AC. AC and phenazopyridine were stopped, and she was treated with oral antihistamine and topical corticosteroids with good response. She completed a course of ciprofloxacin for the treatment of urinary tract infection with complete resolution of her rash.
Fig. 1

(A) Florid maculopapular eruptions over face, neck, and upper chest wall. (B) Densely erythematous maculopapular eruptions developed over neck and back.

Four months later, the patient was referred for to Allergy Clinic for evaluation of her suspected AC hypersensitivity. She consented to patch testing (PT). PT was performed on her back using a Finn Chamber (SmartPractice, Phoenix, AZ, USA) with benzylpenicilloyl-poly-L-lysine (0.04 mg/mL; Diater Laboratorios, Madrid, Spain), minor determinant (0.5 mg/mL; Diater Laboratorios, Madrid, Spain), benzylpenicillin (10,000 U/mL; North China Pharm Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China), amoxicillin (20mg/mL; Diater Laboratorios), AC (30 mg/mL; GlaxoSmithKline UK, Brentford, UK) and phenazopyridine (pulverized tablet and diluted at 10% and 30% in petrolatum; Christo Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Hong Kong). PT was read on day 2 and day 4, according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group Criteria and European Society of Contact Dermatitis guidance. PT was positive to phenazopyridine with demonstrable crescendo effect from day 2 to day 4 (++) and negative to other medications (Fig. 2). A subsequent negative drug provocation test with oral AC (1 g) twice daily for one day excluded an AC hypersensitivity. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication.
Fig. 2

Positive patch test to phenazopyridine diluted at 10% (++) and 30% (++) on day 4. PPL, benzylpenicilloyl poly-L-lysine; MD, minor determinant.

DISCUSSION

Phenazopyridine is a widely prescribed urinary analgesic, but neither immediate- nor delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to phenazopyridine have ever been reported in the literature. This is likely attributable to its rarity as well as an underdiagnosed phenomenon—especially as phenazopyridine is often prescribed together with antibiotics and hypersensitivity reactions are often empirically attributed to the accompanying antibiotic (such as in this case). Both patch and intradermal testing are useful tools in investigating delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions [345]. In this case, we chose to perform PT due to its higher specificity and lower risk of systemic reactivation. Both 10% and 30% concentrations of phenazopyridine were confirmed to be non-irritative by testing on five other healthy individuals. To our knowledge, we describe the first report of a confirmed phenazopyridine delayed-type hypersensitivity and highlight the utility of PT in the workup of this uncommon but important adverse drug reaction.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Phenazopyridine in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  S A Zelenitsky; G G Zhanel
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Fixed Drug Eruption to Biologics and Role of Lesional Patch Testing.

Authors:  Philip H Li; Timothy J Watts; Ho-Yin Chung; Chak-Sing Lau
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  Chronic Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to Chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Timothy J Watts; Philip H Li; Kok Loong Ue; Rubaiyat Haque
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2017-09-19

4.  DRESS Syndrome due to benzylpenicillin with cross-reactivity to amoxicillin.

Authors:  Timothy J Watts; Philip H Li; Rubaiyat Haque
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Safety analysis of long-term phenazopyridine use for radiation cystitis.

Authors:  Stephanie N Shore; Sara R Britnell; Jamie N Brown
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.