Bernard Appiah1, Anubhuti Poudyal2, James N Burdine2, Lucy Asamoah-Akuoko3, David Anidaso Anum3, Irene Akwo Kretchy4, George Sabblah5, Alexander N O Dodoo6, E Lisako J McKyer2. 1. Research Program on Public and International Engagement for Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA Centre for Science and Health Communication, Accra, Ghana. 2. Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. 3. Centre for Science and Health Communication, Accra, Ghana. 4. School of Pharmacy, University of Ghana, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy, Legon, Accra, Ghana. 5. Food and Drugs Authority, Safety Monitoring Department, Accra, Ghana. 6. African Collaborating Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Surveillance, Accra, Ghana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is low in low- and middle-income countries, in part because of poor awareness to report. With the increase in mobile subscription, mobile phones can be used as a platform to disseminate information on ADRs. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the potential of using mobile phone caller tunes (the message or sound the caller hears before the receiver answers the call) to encourage patient reporting of ADRs. METHODS: A total of 38 key informant interviews and 12 focus group discussions (57 participants in groups of 4-5) were conducted in Accra, Ghana. The transcripts were analysed using key constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) including perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioural intention to use caller tunes for patient reporting of ADRs. RESULTS: Respondents mentioned lack of knowledge on reporting ADRs, and their willingness to use mobile phone caller tunes to promote patient reporting of ADRs. Many respondents pointed out how ADRs usually led to discontinuity in medication use, usually without consultation with health professionals. Caller tunes were regarded an innovative, accessible and convenient platform to disseminate information on ADRs. Most respondents intended to use caller tunes with drug safety information to promote ADR reporting, particularly to help their friends and family members. Simplicity of the message, use of songs or messages in local languages and price of downloading the caller tunes were important considerations. CONCLUSION: There is a need for the creation and testing of caller tunes on ADRs in Ghana to promote patient or consumer reporting of ADRs. Further studies are needed to assess factors that could influence the creation and use of caller tunes to disseminate information on drug safety.
BACKGROUND: Patient reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is low in low- and middle-income countries, in part because of poor awareness to report. With the increase in mobile subscription, mobile phones can be used as a platform to disseminate information on ADRs. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the potential of using mobile phone caller tunes (the message or sound the caller hears before the receiver answers the call) to encourage patient reporting of ADRs. METHODS: A total of 38 key informant interviews and 12 focus group discussions (57 participants in groups of 4-5) were conducted in Accra, Ghana. The transcripts were analysed using key constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) including perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioural intention to use caller tunes for patient reporting of ADRs. RESULTS: Respondents mentioned lack of knowledge on reporting ADRs, and their willingness to use mobile phone caller tunes to promote patient reporting of ADRs. Many respondents pointed out how ADRs usually led to discontinuity in medication use, usually without consultation with health professionals. Caller tunes were regarded an innovative, accessible and convenient platform to disseminate information on ADRs. Most respondents intended to use caller tunes with drug safety information to promote ADR reporting, particularly to help their friends and family members. Simplicity of the message, use of songs or messages in local languages and price of downloading the caller tunes were important considerations. CONCLUSION: There is a need for the creation and testing of caller tunes on ADRs in Ghana to promote patient or consumer reporting of ADRs. Further studies are needed to assess factors that could influence the creation and use of caller tunes to disseminate information on drug safety.
Complications arising from medication errors cause avoidable harm across health
systems in the world. In comparison with high-income countries, people in low-income
countries experience twice as many disability adjusted life years owing to
medication-related harm.
Patient morbidity and hospitalization because of adverse drug reactions
(ADRs) have well been documented in Africa.
Weak medication systems, as well as human factors such as fatigue, poor
environmental conditions and staff shortages, can result in severe harm, disability
and death caused by ADRs.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 30% of medications being
sold in Africa can be counterfeit and that 50% of all medications are prescribed,
dispensed or sold inappropriately.[2,3] The sources of
medication-related adverse effects can be diverse. Reporting suspected side effects,
adverse effects, quality concerns and errors are a priority in pharmaceutical management.
This requires consumers to be active participants in detection and generation
of ADR information.A systematic review of factors affecting patient reporting of ADR showed barriers
such as poor awareness, confusion on reporting process, and prior negative reporting experience.
The review identified motivators of patient reporting of ADRs, including
preventing others from getting ADRs, improving drug safety, wanting personal
feedback and having been asked to report adverse effects by healthcare
professionals. Patients are better positioned to understand their health conditions
and to report ADRs.
However, accurate and timely patient reporting of ADRs requires adequate
information through the correct channel to aid informed decisions about their
health.With the increase in mobile subscriptions in Africa, the prospect of using mobile
phones to address health challenges has grown. In Nigeria, the introduction of the
toll-free telephone line was recommended as a potential mechanism to increase drug safety.
Similarly, the use of mobile phones in interviewing patients on ADRs was
shown to be half as costly as home visits in Ghana.
Whereas many mobile health (mHealth) interventions focus on short messaging
system (SMS), issues such as internet connectivity, reporting syntax and cost of
messaging need to be considered before implementing these interventions.
In Africa, mHealth interventions that resulted in positive health-related
outcomes were aided by factors such as accessibility, acceptance and low-cost of the
technology, efficient adaptation to local contexts, active stakeholder collaboration
and active government involvement.
To date, SMS, video messages and phone calls have been used to implement
mHealth interventions.
However, the success of mHealth interventions lies in identifying innovative
approaches that can be cost-effective and acceptable in local context.
Mobile phone caller tunes as a new communication approach
Mobile caller tunes are a popular phenomena in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.
Caller tunes are the opposite of ringtones. Unlike ringtones, which call
recipients hear notifying them of incoming calls, callers hear caller tunes (or
ringback tones) when they make calls.[10,11] Instead of callers hearing
the normal ringback tone when awaiting an answer, callers to mobile phones in
some sub-Saharan African countries could hear a song or message before the
called party answers. These messages or songs that callers hear before call
recipients answer the calls constitute caller tunes. While ringtones are managed
by the phone’s owner under ‘settings’, caller tunes are managed by the mobile
telecommunication operator.Typically, the default ringtones are free but caller tunes are not. The phone
owner may pay the telecommunication company for the service. Many
telecommunication companies such as T-Mobile in the United States,
as well as MTN, Vodafone and Airtel that operate in Africa and Asia, have
caller tunes.Currently most caller tunes in Ghana, for example, promote religious messages and
popular songs.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, studies that test the use of
mobile phone caller tunes for promoting patient reporting of ADRs are lacking.
To assess the potential of using caller tunes for promoting patient reporting of
ADRs, an appropriate theoretical framework is required.
Theoretical background
Among the theories that can be used to explore intention to use information
technologies is the technology acceptance model (TAM). According to the TAM,
behavioural intention to use an information technology such as caller tunes is
largely based on perceived ease of use of the technology, perceived usefulness
of the technology, attitudes to the technology and some external factors (Figure 1).[13-14]
Figure 1.
Technology acceptance model (TAM).
Technology acceptance model (TAM).The TAM has been found to be particularly useful in assessing technological use
in the health sector,
hence our decision to use it as the theoretical basis for this
qualitative study. The primary purpose of the study was to qualitatively assess
the intention of consumers to download caller tunes on ADRs.
Methods
Setting
Participants were purposively selected at blood donation sites in Accra, Ghana,
as part of a larger study that explored the potential of using caller tunes for
changing behaviours such as blood donation and patient reporting of ADRs.Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old, had access to
mobile phones, understood English and were present at blood donation sites in
Accra, Ghana, as either blood donors or nonblood donors.
Ethics approval
The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committees of the Ghana Health
Service (GHS-ERC 05/08/16) and Texas A&M University (IRB2016-0655D).
Respondents gave written consent before participating in the study.
Data collection
The interviews were conducted by two qualitative methods experts familiar with
drug safety issues in sub-Saharan Africa (BA and LAA) and one familiar with
qualitative methods (DAA). In summary, 38 were interviewed whereas 57 took part
in the focus group discussions (FGDs). Those who participated in the FGDs
received Ghana cedi equivalence of US$4 whereas those who took part in the key
informant interviews received US$1 as compensation for their time and
transportation to the venues. The interviews occurred from October to December
2016. The questions for the semistructured interview and FGD were the same and
covered general attitudes to reporting drug safety and topics linked to the
constructs of the TAM: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitudes
and intention to use. FGDs guides also included demographic information such as
age. The interviews and FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed by two members
of the research team. The key informant interviews lasted from 7 min 27 s to
28 min 25 s, and the FGDs lasted from 1 h 14 min to 1 h and 31 min.
Data analysis
Using an inductive thematic analysis based on the framework analysis,
two coauthors (BA and AP) developed a thematic index involving general
attitudes to patient reporting of drug safety and the constructs of the TAM as
used during the interview and FGDs. AP used Excel spreadsheets to summarize the
data by assigning exemplar quotes to the themes. Two of the authors (BA and AP)
met several times to review the themes and quotes. The remaining coauthors
provided feedback on the exemplar quotes and the themes.
Results
In our sample of 95 participants, the mean age was 29.5 years and 73.6% of the
respondents were male. There were 38 participants in interviews and 57 in FGDs.
Table 1 details the
demographic information of the participants in each group.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics.
Sample characteristics
Interviews
Focus group discussions
Age (Mean ± SD)
35.31 ± 14.53
25.61 ± 7.83
Gender (%)
Total
n = 38
n = 57
Male
76.31% (29)
71.92% (41)
Female
23.68% (9)
28.07% (16)
Demographic characteristics.
Perceived usefulness
Most respondents used the words ‘exciting’, ‘interesting’ and ‘inspiring’ to describe
their experience with caller tunes. The participants either had caller tunes on
their phones or knew of someone who did. In general, participants took the messages
given through the caller tunes positively, although its usefulness depended on who
was delivering the message. For instance, the message from celebrities, or religious
leaders were taken more positively than those by regular people. Respondents said:‘Well, depending on what is playing uh, if it is something I don’t
like, I have a bad feeling about it and then if it is a song or a
message I like, then I feel okay.’ Interview, Male, Age 26‘It depends on the type of caller tune that the person has. . .most
[of the] times what I’ve come across is some religious messages like the
person preaching to you. I take it in good faith. At times too some
gospel tunes..[and] some secular tunes. So far I’ve not come across a
caller tune that probably insults or talks rudely to you so in a
nutshell, I’ve taken it in good faith.’ FGD, Male, Age 42
Perceived ease of use
Most respondents considered downloading caller tunes on their phones as an
uncomplicated process:‘It’s easy. Sometimes they normally tell you to press either star
or hash to activate the caller tune if you like it or not.’
FGD, Male, Age 30‘Nowadays, most of the networks especially if you use MTN they
will text you to select a song for your caller tune, so you just use
the one that you love.’ Interview, Male, Age 42‘They’re easy. But the cost sometimes I find it very
expensive.’ FGD, Male, Age 26
Attitudes of people towards drug safety
Many respondents reported discontinuing their medications often without
consulting the doctors when they experienced side effects. Other participants
mentioned that ADRs caused people to warn their family and friends from taking
the same medication.‘When people are on medication, and they develop side effects,
the only thing that they do is they cease taking the medication. And
then two, they discourage people from buying those medicines to
take.’ Interview, Male, Age 60‘In general they don’t go back to the pharmacist or the hospital.
You’ll rather hear it from someone “oohh edro wei die enyeo” [this
medicine is bad] from our local dialect. So if you were prescribed
the same medicine the person will discourage you from taking it
because he took it or she took it and didn’t have any good
outcome.’ Interview, Female, Age 28‘They don’t actually report because they, they will prefer
telling their neighbours and friends rather than going to the
hospital or reporting it to the medical centre.’ Interview,
Female, Age 30Some indicated that ADRs lead some people to rely on herbal medications. In
addition, self-medication, relying on family and friends for suggestions, and
waiting for the side effect to subside before consulting the doctor were other
popular ways participants indicated they coped with adverse drugs reactions. One
participant, for instance, stated:‘If they feel okay I think they’ll also get to take note of the
drugs they’re using but if they don’t feel okay that’s where they
now try to see the doctor. Some wait for too long and you realize
that the sickness becomes worse.’ Interview, Male, Age
28
Knowledge of drug safety reporting
From the perspectives of the respondents, patients generally did not know where
or to whom they should report side effects. There was a general lack of
knowledge and significance of ADRs reporting:‘When the side effects occur, . . .people . . .do not know how to
go back all the way to the hospitals to go and report again so if
this is introduced, I think that is a very good idea and people will
have outlets to really talk about side effects of
medications.’Interview, Female, Age 43In general, participants did not know that patients could also report ADRs by
telephone instead of only going back to hospitals. Thus, most considered
reporting as a waste of time and money.‘You might see it as time wasting. Maybe I’ve gone to the
hospital. They’ve given me chloroquine. Let’s say as she said,
chloroquine, I took car about 5 cedis to that side so am I going to
take 5 cedis again to take car to go and tell them I have this I
have this, you understand? Maybe they’ll say ah, time wasting, why
should I go? It [side effect] will go.”
FGD 9, Male, Age 25
Attitude towards using caller tunes for drug safety
Most respondents expressed how caller tunes could prompt or even motivate people
to report ADRs, particularly in cases when they have had inadequate counselling
from their healthcare professionals. Patients can use the information on where
and to whom to report ADRs through caller tunes:‘If you have a side effect, definitely you need to consult the
doctor. So if something would prompt you to do it, then it is
definitely good.’ Interview, Male, Age 44‘It’s a good idea because, most people even actually don’t know
that, they have to report the side effects of drugs back to their
healthcare professional. So now when we have caller tune educating
these people, then whenever they take the drugs whether at the
hospital or at home and they are having any abnormal feelings, they
will be encouraged to report back.’ Interview, Male, Age
25‘It is a good one. It will help the person to have confidence and
then we’ll be free in expression. If they get the confidence and
then feel relaxed and talk to you [pharmacists] then you can go
ahead and treat them and the illness will go without any side
effect.’ FGD, Female, Age 24A respondent added how caller tunes can support existing mass media, such as
radio and television, to educate people on ADRs. She stated:‘It is a good thing because right now the awareness has started
on the radio and television. I have heard it on radio, I’ve seen it
on television where they tell you that when you take any drugs or
you buy any drugs and you have side effects, report it to the
nearest healthcare or to the Food and Drugs Board. It is something
that started just this year. With the caller tune, I think it will
spread more’ Interview, Female, Age 32
Behavioural intention to use caller tunes
Most respondents intended to use caller tunes with drug safety information for the
sake of their family and friends. One of the major motivators was the intention to
educate family and friends, as one respondent mentioned, ‘Yes please uh,
because I think if we do that it will help um, my colleagues, family members and
outsiders to know that taking drug’ Interview, Male, Age 28.Some participants intended to use caller tunes to educate people on the benefits of
drug safety. One participant said, ‘I have to [use the caller tune] because
it will educate the others who are not familiar with the. . .this thing, the
rules governing the medication.’ Interview, Male, Age 42.
Mobile network and caller tunes design factors
Participants were already aware of caller tunes and knew how to access them. Most
preferred songs to messages, mostly because music was considered a big part of
Ghanaian culture. Some of the respondents were more attracted to caller tunes
that had celebrity voices:‘I will say that most people don’t enjoy reading. Like in our
country here most people do not enjoy reading so we listen to songs,
we watch videos and we are very fine. So if the thing is a caller
tune, then I will go for a song or something, yes.’
Interview, Male, Age 27Since Ghana is a multilingual country, most participants preferred using multiple
languages, particularly Twi and English: ‘Twi is something that we
cannot do away with. So if you take the whole of the nation, about 70% speak
Twi. So we can use Twi and English.’ Interview, Female, Age 37.Simplicity of the message, technical knowledge on downloading caller tunes and
price were other important considerations, among them price being the biggest
motivators to downloading caller tunes on ADRs. Participants mentioned how
subsidized rates to download caller tunes on ADRs could attract more people to
use the caller tunes. Examples of statements from participants include:‘So if they’re to make a directive towards that which is free
for everyone I think it will be easier but once it involves cost
people will not patronize it.’ Interview, Male, Age 28‘Easy download and cheaper price. The cost should be cheaper than
the previous ones.’ Interview, Female, Age 20To publicize the caller tunes, participants suggested sending phone text messages
to people, or having the caller tune in public platforms, such as
customer-service lines. One respondent said, ‘I believe they can also
help by sending text messages to our phone numbers [to publicize
caller tunes]’ FGD, Male, Age 24. Meanwhile, another supported the public
platform: ‘It will really help if they use it [in customer-care
service] because normally most people call the customer-care
service.’ FGD, Female, Age 20.
Social norms
Caller tunes were socially accepted. Participants believed that caller tunes could
educate both friends and strangers on drug safety. A benefit of using caller tunes
for drug safety, as pointed out by some participants was the conversation that
caller tunes could facilitate. One respondent said‘Maybe sometimes they would ask me that; “what is that?”
[caller tune on drug safety] And then me too I would educate them
that this is what is going on.’ Interview, Male, Age 21According to the respondents, the messages would be effective among social groups if
they had a song format, which can trigger conversations:‘I do believe that um, people actually enjoy songs and so if the song
is interesting they will listen to it and at least they will also
understand that fine they are actually promoting this one or that one,
so they will just listen to it and go by it.’ Interview, Male,
Age 27
Discussion
In this study, participants were asked to explain their attitude on reporting ADRs
and the prospect of using mobile phone caller tunes to encourage patients to report
ADRs. Most respondents pointed out how drug safety reporting was an issue in Ghana.
In the advent of adverse effects, most patients usually discontinued their
medications.Several studies have reported side effects as a reason for medication
nonadherence.[17,18] These results are in accord with recent studies that have shown
how ADRs are aggravated when patients fail to report the intake of herbal medication
to their healthcare provider.
Lack of knowledge among the people on the side effects of medication was
another reason mentioned in this study for not reporting ADRs. This finding further
supports the idea that ignorance among patients prevented ADR reporting.[19-22] In addition, res-pondents were
unaware of where to report ADRs in part because of healthcare professionals not
informing patients about why and where to report ADRs. Similar findings have been
reported in previous studies in Ghana.[23,24]Lack of patient reporting of ADRs may result from failure by health professionals to
provide adequate information on drug safety to patients.
For the same reason, patients believe that it is a waste of time to complete
the form on their own.This study shows that ADRs may be underreported because patients considered going
back to the hospital to report them as a waste of time. To address this issue,
studies have assessed the potential of providing a more accessible platform for the
people to report ADRs. In Cameroon, an innovative telephone-based intervention that
allowed parents to report adverse effects following immunization (AEFIs) to health
professionals showed significant increase in the reported cases of AEFIs compared
with the control group that did not have a telephonic platform to report such incidents.
This shows the potential of using a telephone-based medium to increase
people’s accessibility to information on side effects of drugs.In Ghana, a previous study documented health education as a successful intervention
to improve ADR reporting.
Caller tunes can be a novel platform to educate patients on reporting of
ADRs. One of the benefits of caller tunes over other mHealth interventions is that
the individuals who listen to caller tunes more often are the frequent callers,
usually family and friends. This can initiate a conversation on drug safety among
close social groups. Another benefit of using caller tunes to address drug safety
issues is its potential to direct the patients to the correct sources and health
professionals who can answer questions on ADRs. In our study, respondents indicated
how doctors usually do not have enough time to discuss the side effects with their
patients. Caller tunes can be used to direct such patients to the right platform or
sources to discuss drug safety issues. Finally, caller tunes can be an effective
medium supporting other sources of information such as television or radio in
addressing issues of ADRs. It can direct individuals to a more elaborate source of
information on radio or television.Important considerations need to be made when designing mHealth intervention,
especially in developing countries. In our study, the participants perceived caller
tunes as easy to download and use. However, cost, language and content were
important considerations. These concerns are consistent with the findings from prior
studies that have mentioned language, ease of use, layout and costs as important
factors in increasing utility of mobile applications.Although the average age of the respondents is not representative of most of the
population that experiences ADRs (typically those over 50 years),
this study shows that young people have high intention to have caller tunes
on ADRs on their mobile phones should the caller tunes be available. Currently,
caller tunes on ADRs are not available in Ghana. Once available, older people who
may call the mobile phones of younger people are likely to become more aware of the
need to report ADRs. Moreover, after creating the caller tunes on ADRs, it may be
helpful to start inviting staff of pharmacies, healthcare centres, hospitals and
other health services to download them to help patients who will call them to become
aware of the need to report ADRs.
Conclusion
As a formative investigation, this qualitative study tried to determine the intention
of downloading mobile phone caller tunes to promote patient reporting of ADRs.
Additional studies utilizing stronger research designs are needed to assess this,
especially to establish causation. The findings from this study is not
representative of the view of the entire population of Ghana because of the
purposive sampling used to recruit participants. However, our findings provide
evidence of a need for research in this area and provide some direction on next
steps. Because the study shows the potential of using mobile phone caller tunes to
address issues of drug safety, the next step would be to design, implement and
evaluate interventions on ADRs reporting that use this platform. A pilot study can
help generate more representative study outcomes with further insight into factors
that influence the use of caller tunes in promoting patient reporting of ADRs.Further studies are needed especially among patient groups on their intention to use
caller tunes to promote patient ADR reporting. Intervention studies such as that
focusing on a mobile app for ADRs reporting may also be needed to help determine how
patients or consumers will use caller tunes to aid reporting of ADRs, and the
factors that could influence actual use.[27,28]There is a need for creation of caller tunes on ADRs in Ghana. In creating and
testing such caller tunes, the active involvement of telecommunication companies
will be key. Once created, it will be necessary to launch and promote the
availability of such caller tunes among the general population so that people will
become aware of their existence. Callers to mobile phones that will have the
ADR-themed caller tunes are likely to increase their awareness of the need for
patient reporting of ADRs in Ghana.
Authors: George Tsey Sabblah; Delese Mimi Darko; Hudu Mogtari; Linda Härmark; Eugène van Puijenbroek Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Ahmed A Adedeji; Bilqees Sanusi; Azeez Tella; Motunrayo Akinsanya; Olubusola Ojo; Mufliat O Akinwunmi; Olubukola A Tikare; Isiaka A Ogunwande; Omobola A Ogundahunsi; Olajide O Ayilara; Taofeeqah T Ademola; Fatai A Fehintola; Olumide A T Ogundahunsi Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Emma C Davies; Clare I R Chandler; Simeon H S Innocent; Charles Kalumuna; Dianne J Terlouw; David G Lalloo; Sarah G Staedke; Ane Haaland Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Edward J Mills; Jean B Nachega; David R Bangsberg; Sonal Singh; Beth Rachlis; Ping Wu; Kumanan Wilson; Iain Buchan; Christopher J Gill; Curtis Cooper Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Vida Ami Kukula; Alexander A N Dodoo; Jonas Akpakli; Solomon A Narh-Bana; Christine Clerk; Alexander Adjei; Elizabeth Awini; Simon Manye; Richard Afedi Nagai; Gabriel Odonkor; Christian Nikoi; Martin Adjuik; Patricia Akweongo; Rita Baiden; Bernhards Ogutu; Fred Binka; Margaret Gyapong Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Tanja Kastien-Hilka; Ahmed Abulfathi; Bernd Rosenkranz; Bryan Bennett; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Edina Sinanovic Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Godofreda Vergeire-Dalmacion; Nina T Castillo-Carandang; Noel R Juban; Maria Lourdes Amarillo; Maria Pamela Tagle; Emmanuel S Baja Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2015-11-19