Literature DB >> 35173893

In vivo comparative study of the effects of using the enamel matrix derivative and/or photobiomodulation on the repair of bone defects.

Valdir-Gouveia Garcia1,2, Valquíria-Simone-Degraf-Gomes Calil1, Jânderson-de Medeiros Cardoso1, Marcia Hinz1, Tiago-Esgalha da Rocha2, Edilson Ervolino2,3, Daniela-Maria-Janjacomo Miessi2, Luan-Felipe Toro3, Daniela-Atili Brandini4, Letícia-Helena Theodoro2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The repair of bone defects has been the subject of many studies that have shown inconclusive results as to what is the best bone substitute.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bone defects (Ø 2 mm) were induced on the tibia of seventy-two rats, which were distributed into the following four groups/treatments (n=18 each): Control: no treatment; EMD: enamel matrix derived protein; PBM: photobiomodulation therapy (660 nm, 0,035 W, 60 s); EMD + PBM: EMD and immediate treatment with PBM (660 nm, 0,035 W, 60 s). Six animals from each group were euthanized after 10, 30 and 60 days. Histological and immunohistochemistry analyses (osteocalcin - OCN and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase - TRAP) were performed with scores for each of the biological events.
RESULTS: All performed treatments resulted in an increased filling and maturation of bone tissue, being greater in the EMD and EMD + PBM groups in the 30 day period, compared to the Control group. The immunostaining of OCN was greater at 60 days in all treated groups than in the Control over the same period. TRAP immunostaining was higher at 30 days in all treated groups, and lower in groups EMD and PBM after 60 days, compared to the Control over the same period. There was greater immunostaining in the EMD + PBM group after 10 days than in the Control and EMD groups in the same period.
CONCLUSIONS: These results lead to the conclusion that treatments with EMD and PBM, both separate and in association were effective in filling and maturing bone tissue in tibial bone cavities, with greater effectiveness in the period of 30 days in the EMD and EMD + PBM groups. Key words:Enamel matrix proteins, low-level laser, bone, animal research. Copyright:
© 2022 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35173893      PMCID: PMC8842292          DOI: 10.4317/jced.59179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  30 in total

1.  Low level laser therapy modulates viability, alkaline phosphatase and matrix metalloproteinase-2 activities of osteoblasts.

Authors:  Flávia Amadeu de Oliveira; Adriana Arruda Matos; Sandra Satiko Matsuda; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Vanderley Salvador Bagnato; Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado; Carla Andreotti Damante; Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira; Camila Peres-Buzalaf
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 6.252

2.  Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative stimulates proliferation but not differentiation of pre-osteoblastic 2T9 cells, inhibits proliferation and stimulates differentiation of osteoblast-like MG63 cells, and increases proliferation and differentiation of normal human osteoblast NHOst cells.

Authors:  Z Schwartz; D L Carnes; R Pulliam; C H Lohmann; V L Sylvia; Y Liu; D D Dean; D L Cochran; B D Boyan
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Low-intensity laser irradiation stimulates mineralization via increased BMPs in MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Keiko Fujimoto; Takeshi Kiyosaki; Narihiro Mitsui; Kotoe Mayahara; Saori Omasa; Naoto Suzuki; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 4.  Wound repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Gurtner; Sabine Werner; Yann Barrandon; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain(R)) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

6.  Bone repair of critical-sized defects in Wistar rats treated with autogenic, allogenic or xenogenic bone grafts alone or in combination with natural latex fraction F1.

Authors:  Bruna Gabriela Santos Kotake; Miliane Gonçalves Gonzaga; Joaquim Coutinho-Netto; Edilson Ervolino; Fellipe A T de Figueiredo; João Paulo Mardegan Issa
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 7.  Animal models for periodontal disease.

Authors:  Helieh S Oz; David A Puleo
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-10

8.  The Effects of Photobiomodulation of 808 nm Diode Laser Therapy at Higher Fluence on the in Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Andrea Amaroli; Dimitrios Agas; Fulvio Laus; Vincenzo Cuteri; Reem Hanna; Maria Giovanna Sabbieti; Stefano Benedicenti
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Biologic Agents for Periodontal Regeneration and Implant Site Development.

Authors:  Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo; Alberto Monje; Miguel Padial-Molina; ZhiHui Tang; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.