Liu Luo1, Longqiong Wang2, Min Zhang1, Bizhen Liao2. 1. The First Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing City, China. 2. Department of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing City, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To verify the effect of obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators for continuously improving nursing quality. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the obstetric nurse quality in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from October 2019 to September 2020. Nurses and patients in the Obstetrics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were respectively assigned into an experimental group and a control group. High-quality nursing services were provided to patients in both groups. In addition to the high-quality nursing services, the obstetric nurses in the experimental group received training on obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on the knowledge-attitude-practice model. An obstetric nursing quality evaluation was conducted between the two groups. Continuous quality improvement was achieved using the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle. The nursing quality was reflected by 14 obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators and the nurses' job satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group before and after intervention. RESULTS: The information regarding the nurses and parturients, and the nurses' job satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05). Except for information regarding the lateral perineotomy at vaginal delivery, there was no significant difference in other obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators between the two groups before the intervention. In the experimental group, the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction after intervention were better than before (P<0.05). In the experimental group, the rates of neonatal asphyxia/severe neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery after intervention was significantly lower than before (P<0.05). The experimental group had better outcomes than the control group in the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators can be used to improve the nursing quality in continuous quality improvement, which is worthy of promotion in clinics. AJTR
OBJECTIVE: To verify the effect of obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators for continuously improving nursing quality. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the obstetric nurse quality in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from October 2019 to September 2020. Nurses and patients in the Obstetrics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were respectively assigned into an experimental group and a control group. High-quality nursing services were provided to patients in both groups. In addition to the high-quality nursing services, the obstetric nurses in the experimental group received training on obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on the knowledge-attitude-practice model. An obstetric nursing quality evaluation was conducted between the two groups. Continuous quality improvement was achieved using the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle. The nursing quality was reflected by 14 obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators and the nurses' job satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group before and after intervention. RESULTS: The information regarding the nurses and parturients, and the nurses' job satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05). Except for information regarding the lateral perineotomy at vaginal delivery, there was no significant difference in other obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators between the two groups before the intervention. In the experimental group, the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction after intervention were better than before (P<0.05). In the experimental group, the rates of neonatal asphyxia/severe neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery after intervention was significantly lower than before (P<0.05). The experimental group had better outcomes than the control group in the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators can be used to improve the nursing quality in continuous quality improvement, which is worthy of promotion in clinics. AJTR
Authors: Barbara Madaj; Helen Smith; Matthews Mathai; Nathalie Roos; Nynke van den Broek Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Inge C Boesveld; Marieke A A Hermus; Hanneke J de Graaf; Marit Hitzert; Karin M van der Pal-de Bruin; Raymond G de Vries; Arie Franx; Therese A Wiegers Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.007