Ning Chen1, Xintong Wu1, Muke Zhou1, Rongdong Yang2, Daofeng Chen3, Ming Liao4, Yongyi Deng5, Zhen Hong1, Dong Zhou1, Li He1. 1. Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. Department of Neurology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, China. 3. Department of Neurology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China. 4. Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Jintang, Chengdu, China. 5. Department of Neurology, West China Ganzi Hospital of Sichuan University, Kangding, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is still underutilized in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in China. A promising strategy for addressing this issue, especially in situations, such as the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is the telestroke mode, which remains to be widely implemented in China. The present study aimed to assess the effects of telemedicine for patients with stroke in Western China, as well as the impact of the pandemic on telestroke services in 1 year after the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: In this 2-year multicenter observational study, we retrospectively collected data from 10 hospitals within the Sichuan Telestroke and Telethrombolysis Network. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with IS and those relevant to thrombolysis were compared between the pre-telestroke and post-telestroke phases, and between the periods before and after declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 11,449 admissions with a primary diagnosis of IS were recorded during the study period. Prior to telestroke implementation, 6.7% of patients (n = 367) received intravenous thrombolysis, and the proportion increased to 7.4% (n = 443; p = 0.084) in the post-telestroke phase. The thrombolysis rate was 7.4% during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the latter half of the year when the viral spread was better controlled in China. The mean door-to-needle time (DNT) was significantly shorter after implementation of the telestroke network (63.76 ± 13.50 vs. 52.66 ± 25.49 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is effective in improving the thrombolysis administration among patients with IS in Western China. Implementation of the telestroke network should be promoted, especially when access to care is affected by public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is still underutilized in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in China. A promising strategy for addressing this issue, especially in situations, such as the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is the telestroke mode, which remains to be widely implemented in China. The present study aimed to assess the effects of telemedicine for patients with stroke in Western China, as well as the impact of the pandemic on telestroke services in 1 year after the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: In this 2-year multicenter observational study, we retrospectively collected data from 10 hospitals within the Sichuan Telestroke and Telethrombolysis Network. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with IS and those relevant to thrombolysis were compared between the pre-telestroke and post-telestroke phases, and between the periods before and after declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 11,449 admissions with a primary diagnosis of IS were recorded during the study period. Prior to telestroke implementation, 6.7% of patients (n = 367) received intravenous thrombolysis, and the proportion increased to 7.4% (n = 443; p = 0.084) in the post-telestroke phase. The thrombolysis rate was 7.4% during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the latter half of the year when the viral spread was better controlled in China. The mean door-to-needle time (DNT) was significantly shorter after implementation of the telestroke network (63.76 ± 13.50 vs. 52.66 ± 25.49 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is effective in improving the thrombolysis administration among patients with IS in Western China. Implementation of the telestroke network should be promoted, especially when access to care is affected by public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: Edilberto Amorim; Min-Mei Shih; Steven A Koehler; Lori L Massaro; Syed F Zaidi; Mouhammad A Jumaa; Vivek K Reddy; Maxim D Hammer; Tudor G Jovin; Lawrence R Wechsler Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: René Handschu; Mateusz Scibor; Angela Wacker; David R Stark; Martin Köhrmann; Frank Erbguth; Patrick Oschmann; Stefan Schwab; Lars Marquardt Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Steven R Messé; Pooja Khatri; Mathew J Reeves; Eric E Smith; Jeffrey L Saver; Deepak L Bhatt; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Margueritte Cox; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 9.910