| Literature DB >> 35173563 |
Sawsan M El-Sonbaty1, Fatma Sm Moawed2, Eman I Kandil3, Amira M Tamamm3.
Abstract
Cancer is a mortality contributor worldwide, and breast cancer is the most common among women. Despite the numerous breast cancer therapeutic strategies, they either have limitations or sometimes are resisted by cancer, so new approaches are needed to tackle those restrictions. Nanotechnology offers exciting leaps in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, especially breast cancer. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the newly synthesized gallium nanoparticles coated by Ellagic acid (EA-GaNPs) on the induced mammary gland carcinogenesis in female rats and their antibacterial activities comparison with standard antibiotics (Ketoconazole (100 μg/ml) and Gentamycin (4 μg/ml)) by disc diffusion method using eight different microbial species. The antitumor efficacy of EA-GaNPs was conducted both in vitro and in in vivo. The result of antimicrobial activity of EA-Ga NPs (1 mg/1 mL) revealed moderate toxicity behavior against Gram-positive {Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus) and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria {Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgarfs) also, antifungal activity was detected against {Aspergillus terreus). In vitro study showed that EA-GaNPs inhibited human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) proliferation with IC50 of 2.86 μg/ml. Although in vivo; the administration of EA-GaNPs to DMBA-treated rats ameliorated the hyperplastic state of mammary gland carcinogenesis induced by DMBA. Additionally, EA-GaNPs administration significantly modulated the activities of ALT and AST, as well as the levels of urea and creatinine in serum. Also, EA-GaNPs administration improved the antioxidant state by increasing Superoxide dismutase activity and GSH content, and decreasing malondialdehyde content in the mammary tissue, besides enhancing the apoptotic activity through elevating the levels of caspase-3 and decreasing the protein intensities of protein kinase B & phosphatidyl inositide 3-kinases. Furthermore, a significant decrease in serum Total iron-binding capacity accompanied by a significant increase in the level of calcium was noted. So, it can be concluded that the newly synthesized nanoparticles EA-GaNPs have an efficient antitumor activity that was manifested by reduction of the viability on the human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) in vitro. Also, in vivo against the chemically induced mammary gland carcinogenesis in a female rat model. Histopathological findings were in harmony with biochemical and molecular results showing the effectiveness of EA-GaNPs against mammary carcinogenesis. Therefore, EA-GaNPs could be a promising, potent anti-cancer compound.Entities:
Keywords: 7, 12-Dimethy1benz[a] Anthracene; Caspase-3; EA-GaNPs; antioxidants; phosphatidyl inositide 3-kinases; protein kinase B
Year: 2022 PMID: 35173563 PMCID: PMC8841935 DOI: 10.1177/15593258211068998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dose Response ISSN: 1559-3258 Impact factor: 2.658
Figure 1.Characterization of synthesized EA-Ga NPs. (A) DLS analysis, (B) Ultraviolet-visible absorption (UV-VIS), (C) Transmission electron microscope with a magnification ×20,000, bar =200 nm.
Figure 2.FT-IR spectrum of (A) Ellagic acid, (B) EA-GaNPs.
Antimicrobial Activity of EA-Ga NPs.
| Fungi | Inhibition Zone (mm) | Reference Drug Ketoconazole (100 Qg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
|
| NA | 16 ± 1.7 |
|
| NA | 20 ± 2.1 |
|
| 1.2 ± 0.2 | 17 ± 1.9 |
| Gram positive bacteria | Gentamycin (4 pg/mL) | |
|
| 14 ± 1.2 | 24 ± 2.3 |
|
| 11 ± 1.1 | 26 ± 2.9 |
|
| 1.2 ± .07 | 21 ± 2.3 |
| Gram negative bacteria | Gentamycin (4 pg/mL) | |
|
| 12 ± 1.5 | 30 ± 2.7 |
|
| 10 ± 0.9 | 25 ± 2.1 |
Figure 3.Antitumor efficacy of EA-GaNPs against human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7).
Effect of EA-GaNPs on Serum Levels of ALT, AST, Urea and Creatinine.
| Groups | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | Urea (mg/dl) | Creatinine (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 16.7 ± 4.04
| 12.2 ± 1.9
| 41 ± 8.7
| .14 ± .03
|
| DMBA | 47.5 ± 5.5
| 36.3± 4.04
| 81.3 ± 8.5
| .89 ± .11
|
| EA-GaNPs | 18.7 ± 3.05
| 16.0± 1.7
| 39.3 ± 9.5
| .25 ± .04
|
| DMBA+EA-GaNPs | 31.7±4.5
| 26.7± 2.5
| 57.3 ± 4.04
| .49 ± .04
|
Data are expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation.
aSignificance versus control group.
bSignificance versus DMBA group.
EA-GaNPs Effect on MDA Level, SOD Activity and GSH Content in the Mammary Tissue.
| Groups | MDA (nmol/mg protein) | SOD (U/mg protein) | GSH (mg/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 10.9 ± .99
| 4.23 ± .76
| 69.8 ± 9.98
|
| DMBA | 42.9 ± 4.40
| 1.03 ± .17
| 30.3 ± 2.70
|
| EA-GaNPs | 9.6 ± 1.420
| 3.90 ± .74
| 72.7 ± 2.96
|
| DMBA+EA GaNPs | 22.5 ± 2.90
| 2.60± .21
| 51.8 ± 7.80
|
Data are expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation.
aSignificance versus control group.
bSignificance versus DBMA group.
Figure 4.EA-Ga NPs effect on (A) mammary tissue caspase-3 concentration, (B) serum TIBC level and (C): serum calcium level.a significance vs the control group.b significance versus DMBA group.
Figure 5.Western immunoblotting analysis of AKT &PI3K protein intensity in the mammary tissue.
Figure 6.Photomicrograph of mammary gland sections in different experimental rat groups. (A) Control group; normal histological structure of the acini (a) and ducts (d) embedded in adipose tissue (ad), (H&E, 16X), (B) DMBA group; histopathological alterations in the architecture of the glands as the lining epithelial cells of the acini and lactiferous ducts showed proliferative hyperplasia (h) with cystic dilatation (c) as well as stratification (s), (H&E, ×16), (C) DMBA group; magnification of the cystic ductal dilatation(c) and the stratification (s) of the lining epithelium of the acini, (H&E, 40X).(D) EA-GaNPs group; normal histological structure of the acini (a) and ducts (d) embedded in adipose tissue, (H&E, 40X)., (E) EAGaNPs group; magnification of the normal histological structure of the acini (a) and ducts (d) embedded in adipose tissue, (H&E, 80X),(F) DMBA+EA-GaNPs group; mild recurrence of normal mammary tissue histological structure with mild stratification of the acinar lining epithelium, (H&E, ×16), (G) DMBA+EA-GaNPs group; magnification of the mild stratification of the acinar lining epithelium, (H&E, ×40) and (H) DMBA+EA-GaNPs group; magnification of the mild stratification of the acinar lining epithelium, (H&E, 80X).