| Literature DB >> 35173209 |
Belela Samuel Kotola1, Temesgen Tibebu Mekonnen2.
Abstract
In this paper, we have considered a deterministic mathematical model to analyze effective interventions for meningitis and pneumonia coinfection as well as to make a rational recommendation to public healthy, policy or decision makers and programs implementers. We have introduced the epidemiology of infectious diseases, the epidemiology of meningitis, the epidemiology of pneumonia, and the epidemiology of infection of meningitis and pneumonia. The positivity and boundedness of the sated model was shown. Our model elucidate that, the disease free equilibrium points of each model are locally asymptotically stable if the corresponding reproduction numbers are less than one and globally asymptotically stable if the corresponding reproduction numbers are greater than one. Additionally, we have analyzed the existence and uniqueness of the endemic equilibrium point of each sub models, local stability and global stability of the endemic equilibrium points for each model. By using standard values of parameters we have obtained from different studies, we found that the effective reproduction numbers of meningitis [Formula: see text] and effective reproduction numbers of pneumonia [Formula: see text] that lead us to the effective reproduction number of the meningitis and pneumonia co-infected model is [Formula: see text]. Applying sensitivity analysis, we identified the most influential parameters that can change the behavior of the solution of the meningitis pneumonia coinfection dynamical system are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Biologically, decrease in [Formula: see text] and increasing in [Formula: see text] is a possible intervention strategy to reduce the infectious from communities. Finally, our numerical simulation has shown that vaccination against those diseases, reducing contact with infectious persons and treatment have the great effect on reduction of these silent killer diseases from the communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35173209 PMCID: PMC8850616 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06253-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Descriptions of parameters.
| Number | Parameter | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The rate at which meningitis infected individual are recovered naturally | |
| 2 | The rate at which meningitis and pneumonia co infected individual treated and inter to treated class | |
| 3 | The rate at which meningitis and pneumonia co infected individual are recovered from both diseases | |
| 4 | Natural death rate | |
| 5 | Meningitis only caused death rate and Pneumonia only caused death rate, respectively | |
| 6 | Meningitis and pneumonia co-infected caused death rate | |
| 7 | Modification parameter, where | |
| 8 | Rate of loss of immunity | |
| 9 | The portion of vaccinated new born | |
| 10 | Recruitment rate | |
| 11 | Meningitis and Pneumonia contract rate, respectively | |
| 12 | vaccine wanes rate | |
| 13 | The rate at which pneumonia infected individual are recovered naturally |
Figure 1Flow chart of meningitis and pneumonia coinfection.
Parameter values (NB: WHO’s 2019 relevant demographic data about Ethiopia are used).
| No | Parameter | Parameter’s description | Value | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The rate at which meningitis infected individual are recovered naturally | 0.02 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 2 | The rate at which pneumonia infected individual are recovered naturally | 0.0115 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 3 | The rate at which meningitis and pneumonia co infected individual treated and inter to treated class | 0.3102 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 4 | The rate at which meningitis and pneumonia co infected individual are recovered after treatment (temporarily immunity to pneumonia and meningitis after treatment) | 0.1 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 5 | Natural death rate | 0.01 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 6 | Meningitis only caused death rate | 0.002–0.2 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 7 | Pneumonia only caused death rate | 0.006–0.5 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 8 | Meningitis and pneumonia coinfection caused death rate | 0.008–0.7 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 9 | Modification parameter and | 1 | Time−1 | Assumed | |
| 10 | The modification parameter and | 1 | Time−1 | Assumed | |
| 11 | Rate of loss of immunity | 0.00735–0.363 | Time−1 | [ | |
| 12 | The portion of vaccinated new born | 0.105 | [ | ||
| 13 | Recruitment rate | 0.0413* N0 | Size * time−1 | WHO 2019 | |
| 14 | Meningitis contact rate | 0.9 | Size−1 * time−1 | [ | |
| 15 | Pneumonia contract rate | 0.007–0.6 | Size−1 *time−1 | [ | |
| 16 | Vaccine wanes rate | 0.263 | Time−1 | [ |
The parameter’s values from different articles and WHO.
Sensitivity indices of .
| Sensitivity index | Value |
|---|---|
| 0.9961538 | |
| − 0.8104 | |
| 0.00067738 | |
| − 0.00099615 |
Sensitivity indices of .
| Sensitivity index | Value |
|---|---|
| 0.003705 | |
| 0.99614 | |
| 0.99613 | |
| − 0.105 | |
| 0.0077899 | |
| − 0.0010599 | |
| − 0.001063 |
Figure 2The stability of the disease-free equilibrium point (DFE).
Figure 3Infectious class when reproduction number is less than one.
Figure 4Infectious class when reproduction number is greater than one.
Figure 5Stability of endemic equilibrium point of the meningitis and pneumonia confected model.
Figure 6Effect of vaccination on meningitis and pneumonia effective reproduction number.
Figure 7Effect of contact rate on meningitis and pneumonia effective reproduction number.
Figure 8Effect of treatment of co-infected class on meningitis and pneumonia co-infected class.
Figure 9Effect of vaccination wanes on susceptible class.
Figure 10Effect of vaccination rate on meningitis and pneumonia reproduction number.
Figure 11Effect of portion of vaccination on co-infected class.