| Literature DB >> 35172010 |
Mariem Ben Youssef1, Brigitte Christelle Ouédraogo1, Pierre Bastarache1, Pascal Dumas1, Chandra E Moffat2, Jessica L Vickruck2, Pier Jr Morin1.
Abstract
The Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)) is an insect that can adapt to various challenges, including temperature fluctuations or select insecticide treatments. This pest is also an ongoing threat to the potato industry. Small noncoding RNAs such as miRNAs, which can control posttranscriptionally the expression of various genes, and piRNAs, which can notably impact mRNA turnover, are modulated in insects under different conditions. Unfortunately, information regarding the expression status of key players involved in their synthesis and function is for the most part lacking. The current study thus aims at assessing the levels of such targets in L. decemlineata exposed to hot and cold temperatures as well as treated to the insecticides chlorantraniliprole, clothianidin, imidacloprid, and spinosad. Transcript expression levels of Ago1, Ago2, Ago3, Dcr2a, Dcr2b, Expo-5, Siwi-1, and Siwi-2, components of pathways associated with small noncoding RNA production or function, were measured by qRT-PCR and revealed modulation of select transcripts in response to temperature challenges and to select insecticides. RNAi-mediated reduction of Ago2 transcript levels in L. decemlineata injected with Ago2-targeting dsRNA and exposed to cold and warm temperatures was also conducted. Changes in survival rates were observed for the latter condition in dsRNA- versus saline-injected insects. These results showcase the differential expression of select targets involved in small noncoding RNA homeostasis and provide leads for the subsequent assessment of their involvement during stress response in L. decemlineata using RNAi-based approaches.Entities:
Keywords: Colorado potato beetle; chlorantraniliprole; clothianidin; cold hardiness; heat shock
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35172010 PMCID: PMC8849280 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieac004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Primers used for quantification by qRT-PCR of relevant transcripts
| Primer | Sequence | Efficiency | Temperature | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ago1 | Fwd | 5′-GGTCGACCTATCGGACTGAA-3′ | 87.0% | 61.0°C |
| Rev | 5′-GTTGCCAATAGGCAGTGGAT-3′ | |||
| Ago2 | Fwd | 5′-ACGATACCCAGCTTTCGATG-3′ | 108.3% | 59.2°C |
| Rev | 5′-TTCAAATTGTGCAACGGTGT-3′ | |||
| Ago3 | Fwd | 5′-AGAAAGTCAGAAGCGGCTCA-3′ | 96.5% | 60.5°C |
| Rev | 5′-CGTCTCTCCCCGTGTAAAAA-3′ | |||
| Dcr2a | Fwd | 5′-GACAGCATGAAGGGTCACGA-3′ | 97.7% | 60.5°C |
| Rev | 5′-TGGATTCCCTGGTGTCGTTG-3′ | |||
| Dcr2b | Fwd | 5′-CGCTCGTACATTCAGTCGAA-3′ | 109.5% | 59.0°C |
| Rev | 5′-AGGATCGGATCTCTCCTGGT-3′ | |||
| Expo-5 | Fwd | 5′-TAAGTACCAGGTCTCGGGCA-3′ | 98.5% | 60.5°C |
| Rev | 5′-CGCCTCCCTCAACATCTCTC-3′ | |||
| Siwi-1 | Fwd | 5′-ACAGGTGCTATGTCGGTTGC-3′ | 95.6% | 53.5°C |
| Rev | 5′-ATCTTGTGGCGTTTCTGTCC-3′ | |||
| Siwi-2 | Fwd | 5′-CGAGCTAGAGGAAGGGCAAG-3′ | 106.5% | 60.5°C |
| Rev | 5′-TGAGTTGGTGTAGGCTGCTG-3′ | |||
| α-tubulin | Fwd | 5′-GAGTTCCAGACCAACTTGGT-3′ | 107.9% | 52.6°C |
| Rev | 5′- GCCATGTACTTGCCGTGACG -3′ | |||
| RP-18 | Fwd | 5′-TAGAATCCTCAAAGCAGGTGGCGA-3′ | 110.1% | 60.0°C |
| Rev | 5′-AGCTGGACCACCGTGTTTCACTGC-3′ |
Fwd (Forward) and Rev (Reverse) primers.
Fig. 1.(A) Transcript levels in insects submitted to cold conditions versus control insects. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 6 biological replicates). (B) Transcript levels in heat-exposed versus control insects. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). Asterisks represent results significantly different from control samples (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 2.(A) Expression of transcript levels in chlorantraniliprole-treated versus untreated insects. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 4–6 biological replicates). (B) Expression of transcript levels in clothianidin-treated versus untreated insects. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 4–5 biological replicates). Asterisks represent results significantly different from control samples (*P < 0.05). (C) Expression of transcript levels in imidacloprid-treated versus untreated insects. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). Asterisks depict results that are significantly different (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.005). (D) Transcript levels in spinosad-exposed versus untreated insects. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 4–5 biological replicates).
Fig. 3.(A) Ago2 expression in L. decemlineata following dsRNA injection. Histogram shows Ago2 transcript levels in dsRNA- or saline-injected L. decemlineata postinjection. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 7 biological replicates). Asterisks represent results significantly different from control samples (*P < 0.05). (B) Impact of cold response on insect viability in dsRNA-injected L. decemlineata. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis depicts L. decemlineata survival (n = 22) in saline- or Ago2 dsRNA-injected insects after exposure to temperatures ranging from 15°C, 5°C, −5°C and then returning to 15°C.
Fig. 4.(A) Ago2 transcript levels in L. decemlineata following dsRNA injection. Histogram shows Ago2 expression status in dsRNA- or saline-injected insects postinjection. Data are mean standardized transcript levels (mean ± SEM, n = 4 biological replicates). Asterisks identify results significantly different from control samples (*P < 0.05). (B) Effect of heat exposure response on insect survival in dsRNA-injected L. decemlineata. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis presents L. decemlineata survival (n = 22–23) in saline- or Ago2 dsRNA-injected insects exposed to heat treatment (P = 0.01).