Infants' brain activity to cartoon face using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

In this study, to investigate whether infants showed face-specific brain activity to a cartoon human face, we conducted a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) experiment and a behavioral experiment. In the fNIRS experiment, we measured the hemodynamic responses of 5- and 6-month-old infants to cartoon female and cartoon character faces using fNIRS. The results showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb increased for cartoon female faces but not for cartoon character faces. This indicates that face-specific brain activity occurred for cartoon female faces but not cartoon character faces, despite the fact that both are faces. In the behavioral experiment, we examined whether the 5- and 6-month-old infants preferred cartoon female faces to cartoon character faces in the upright and inverted conditions. The results showed a preference for cartoon female faces in the upright but not in the inverted condition. This indicates that 5- and 6-month-old infants can perceive cartoon female faces, but not cartoon character faces, as faces. The results of the two experiments indicated that face-specific brain activity occurred for cartoon female faces. This indicates that infants can perceive cartoon female faces as faces.

Introduction

Humans have the ability to perceive a face even in non-realistic faces, such as in cartoon faces used in animation. A previous study reported that infants can perceive a cartoon face as a face in behavioral experiments [1]. Kobayashi et al. recently investigated whether infants perceive a cartoon face as a face [1]. They compared the infants’ preference between the mother’s and a stranger’s face of the cartoon image and found that infants preferred the mother’s face even in the cartoon image. The results suggest that infants can recognize the mother’s face in a cartoon image. This study indicated infants’ ability to perceive cartoon face processing in behavioral experiments, although no prior study has examined infants’ brain activity in response to cartoon faces. In this study, we investigated whether cartoon faces induced brain activity similar to photographed faces using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Previous studies have shown that infants can recognize various face types, such as cartoon faces and faces applied global liner transformation as faces [2], and that the composite face effect occurs in infants [3]. Yamashita et al. investigated the effect of global linear transformations on the recognition of mothers’ faces in infants [2]. They applied global linear transformations (shearing, horizontal stretching, and vertical stretching) to both the mother’s face and the stranger’s face, and tested infants’ preferences between these faces. 7-month-old infants showed a preference for the mother’s face with vertical stretching but not with shearing and horizontal stretching. These findings suggest that 7-month-old infants might recognize the mother’s face even during vertical stretching, similar to adults. Nakato et al. examined whether the composite face effect occurred in infants aged 5-8months [3]. The composite face effect is that participants are slower and less accurate in recognizing the top half of one face presented in a composite with the bottom half of another face. This indicates the holistic processing of the face. In their study, they compared infants’ preference for the mother’s face between the composite and non-composite face conditions. The results showed that 7- to 8-month-old infants preferred the mother’s face in the non-composite condition but not in the composite condition. That is, infants can recognize the mother’s face in non-composite but not composite conditions. This indicates that the composite face effect occurred only in 7- to 8- month-old infants. This suggests that infants older than 7 months are able to process familiar faces holistically. Recently, Kobayashi et al. investigated the development of the ability to recognize familiar faces in drawings [1]. They examined the preference for the mother’s face between photographed and cartoon images in 6- to 8-month-old infants, and only 7- to 8-month-old infants showed a preference for mother’s faces regardless of a photographed or cartoon image. The results suggested that cartoon faces as well as a photographed faces could be recognized as faces by 7- to 8-month-old infants. These previous studies revealed that 7-month-old infants showed holistic face processing for various face types.

In adults, face-specific brain activities in various face types have been investigated [4-7]. Tong et al. examined brain activity in response to a variety of face-like stimuli such as cartoons and cat faces using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [4]. Cartoon and cat faces as well as human faces induced fusiform face area (FFA) responses. This result suggests a generalization of the FFA response across different face types. Gomez et al. indicated that extensive experience with cartoon characters induced face-specific brain activity [5]. They investigated whether Pokémon induced face-specific activities through extensive childhood experiences. They measured the brain activity in response to Pokémon in adults with and without childhood experience of playing Pokémon. The responses to Pokémon in the occipitotemporal sulcus (OTS) were shown only in participants with Pokémon experience. The face-specific brain activity in a boy with autism who had a special interest in Digimon was investigated by Grelotti et al. [6]. They compared brain activity in response to Digimon and to the human face using fMRI and showed that his amygdala and fusiform gyrus were activated by Digimon but not the human face. The event-related potential (ERP) study also suggested face-specific brain activity to a variety of face-like stimuli. Sagiv et al. investigated whether face-specific brain activity was induced by photographs of natural faces, realistically painted portraits, sketches of faces, and schematic faces using ERPs [7]. They compared the N170 ERP components elicited by these faces, and N170 did not distinguish between different face types. These results suggest that even the schematic face made from simple line fragments triggered the N170.

In this study, we aimed to investigate face-specific brain activity in response to cartoon faces in infants using fNIRS. Kobayashi et al. have demonstrated that 7- to 8-month-old infants show a preference for the mother’s face, regardless of whether these faces are presented as photographed or cartoon images [1]. This result indicates that 7- to 8-month-olds can perceive cartoon faces as faces. In this study, we measured the hemodynamic responses of 5- to 6-month-old infants to cartoon female faces and cartoon character faces using fNIRS. We examined the differences in face-specific brain activity in response to cartoon female faces and cartoon character faces. We predicted that infants could perceive cartoon female faces as faces [1] but not cartoon character faces. In this case, we hypothesized that face-specific hemodynamic responses, as in previous studies [8-11], should be induced by cartoon female faces but not cartoon character faces. Before the fNIRS experiments, we conducted behavioral experiments to examine whether infants prefer cartoon female faces to cartoon character faces using the preferential looking method. In two orientation conditions (upright and inverted), we examined whether infants looked longer at the cartoon female face than at the cartoon character face. In general, the recognition of an inverted face is poor compared to an upright face. This effect, known as the face-inversion effect, occurs only on the face. An infant study showed that this effect exists in 4-month-old infants [12]. We predicted the infants’ preference for cartoon female faces in the upright but not in the inverted condition.

Experiment 1

Materials and methods

Participants

38 healthy 5- and 6-month-old infants (17 boys and 21 girls, mean age of 164.71 days, range from 136–193 days) participated in the experiments. Infants were assigned randomly and in equal numbers to the orientation conditions (upright and inverted). An additional 13 infants were tested but excluded from the final analysis owing to fussiness or an insufficient number of available trials (fewer than 30 s for both sides of the stimuli). The infants were recruited through newspaper advertisements. This study was conducted according to the Declaration Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Chuo University. Parents gave prior written informed consent for their children’s participation and for publication of the results in an online open-access publication.

Stimuli

Stimuli were color images of three cartoon human female faces and three cartoon character faces (Fig 1). All cartoon female faces were automatically produced using free software available online (http://www.photo-kako.com/) by uploading the original images. These faces were in the frontal view with neutral expression. The cartoon female face stimuli were 13.3°×17.9° in size. The cartoon character face stimuli were used the characters of “ANPANMAN” that is the famous Japanese cartoon. The cartoon character face stimuli were 14.5°×16.0° in size. The inverted cartoon female and cartoon character faces were produced by rotating the original upright face by 180°.

Fig 1

Examples of the cartoon female and character faces used as stimuli.

Faces were presented on a gray background. The cartoon character face stimuli used in the experiment were different from the images in Fig 1. Because of the copyright, we used other character faces here, instead of the “ANPANMAN.” For details of the cartoon character face stimuli, see the Materials and Methods section in Experiment 1.

Apparatus

All infants were tested while sitting on their parent’s lap at a viewing distance of approximately 40 cm from a 24-inch LCD monitor, which was controlled by a computer. Both the infant and the monitor were surrounded by an enclosure covered with black cloth. Each infant’s looking behavior throughout the experiment was recorded through a charge-couple device (CCD) camera positioned directly below the monitor, which was connected to a TV monitor and a digital video recorder positioned outside the enclosure. The experimenter started the sequence of the trial by looking at the live image of the infant’s face displayed on the TV monitor. The recorded images of the infant’s face and looking behavior allowed for the offline coding of looking times.

Procedure

Infants were randomly assigned to one of two orientation conditions (upright and inverted). The preferential looking method was used to measure each infant’s response. The experimental session consisted of six 10 s trials. At the beginning of each trial, a cartoon with a brief sound was presented at the center of the monitor to attract the infant’s attention. The experimenter initiated each trial as soon as the infant began paying attention to the cartoon. In each trial, a cartoon female face and a cartoon character face were presented side by side on the monitor. The position and pair of stimuli were counterbalanced across the infants.

One observer analyzed frame-by-frame video recordings of infants’ eye movements to record the total looking time at each of the two faces during each phase. In addition, video recordings of 5 infants were analyzed by a second independent observer. Both observers were unaware of the position (left/right), where the cartoon female and cartoon character faces would be presented on the screen. Interobserver reliability throughout the experiment was high (Pearson’s r = .88, for the duration of fixation).

Result

We calculated an individual percentage preference score for cartoon female faces over cartoon character faces in two orientation conditions (upright/inverted). The mean preference score is shown in Fig 2. The preference scores were calculated by dividing the infants spent looking at the cartoon female faces during the 6 test trials by their total looking time over 6 test trials. The score obtained was multiplied by 100. A preference for cartoon female faces indicates above chance (50%), and a preference for a cartoon character face indicates below chance. If the infants detected faces in the cartoon female faces, they would look longer at them than at the cartoon character faces in the upright but not inverted condition. To test whether the infants prefer the cartoon female faces, we conducted a two-tailed t-test on the preference score (vs. a chance level of 50%). We found that 5- and 6-month-old infants significantly preferred cartoon female faces to cartoon character faces in the upright condition (t (18) = 2.80, p < .05, d = 0.93), but not in the inverted condition (t (18) = 1.13, ns.).

Fig 2

Preference scores for cartoon female face (vs. cartoon character face) in upright and inverted conditions (Experiment 1).

A preference for a cartoon female face indicates above chance (50%), and a preference for cartoon character face indicates below chance. Error bars represent standard error.

Experiment 2

11 healthy 5- and 6-month-old infants (6 boys and 5 girls, mean age of 180.72 days, range from 155–191 days) participated in the experiments. An additional 11 infants were tested but excluded from the final analysis because of an insufficient number of available trials (fewer than three trials for either the cartoon female face or cartoon character face condition) owing to crying, failure to look at stimuli, or motion artifacts. Sample size was based on previous studies testing infants’ cortical hemodynamic changes during observation of face stimuli [8, 13, 14]. The infants were recruited through newspaper advertisements. This study was conducted according to the Declaration Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Chuo University. Parents gave prior written informed consent for their children’s participation and for publication of the results in an online open-access publication.

Stimuli and design

The stimulus presentation consisted of a test and a baseline period (Fig 3). The stimuli for the test period were color images of five cartoon female faces and five cartoon character faces. The stimuli for the baseline period were color images of five cartoon vegetables. Cartoon vegetables were automatically produced using free software available online (http://www.photo-kako.com/) by uploading the original images. The cartoon female face stimuli were 17.1°×23.3°, the cartoon character face stimuli were 19.4°×21.4°, and the vegetable stimuli were 16.8°×16.8° in size.

Fig 3

Experimental procedure.

In each trial, the baseline period consisted of the presentation of the images of five cartoon vegetables. The duration of the baseline period was at least 10 s. The test period consisted of the presentation the images of five cartoon female faces and cartoon character faces. The duration of the test period was 5 s. The presentation order was altered for test periods 1 and 2 for each infant. The cartoon character face stimuli used in the experiment were different from the images in Fig 3. Because of the copyright, we used other character faces here, instead of the “ANPANMAN”.

In each trial, five faces were presented in random order at a rate of 1 Hz under either the cartoon female or cartoon character condition. The faces of cartoon females and cartoon characters were presented in alternating trials. Faces of cartoon females were shown in half of the trials and those of cartoon characters in the other half. The order of the two conditions was counterbalanced across the infants. The total duration of each test period was fixed at 5 s.

Each test period followed a baseline period. During the baseline period, five vegetables were shown in a random order at a rate of 1 Hz. The baseline period was controlled by the experimenter, and the duration was at least 10 s. The results obtained from viewing vegetables were used as the baseline.

In both the baseline and test periods, the stimulus duration was 800 ms, and a small red cross was presented during the 200 ms interstimulus interval. To attract and retain the infant’s attention, both the face and vegetable stimuli were accompanied by a beeping sound presented at 1 Hz. Two different sounds were used for the face stimuli and the vegetables, but the same sound was used for the cartoon female and cartoon character faces.

Apparatus and procedure

All stimuli were displayed on a 32-inch LCD monitor (Display++, Cambridge Research Systems [CRS]) with a resolution of 1920×1080 pixels controlled by a computer. Both the infant and LCD monitor were located inside an enclosure made of iron poles and covered with black cloth. The infant’s viewing distance from the LCD monitor was approximately 60 cm. There were two loudspeakers, one on either side of the LCD monitor. A CCD camera was placed directly below the monitor screen. Throughout the experiment, the infant’s behavior was videotaped using this camera. The experimenter could observe the infant’s behavior via a video monitor connected to the CCD camera.

Each infant was tested while sitting on their parent’s lap and facing a computer screen. The infants watched the stimuli passively while their brain activity was measured, and they were allowed to watch the stimuli for as long as they were willing to.

Recoding

We used a Hitachi ETG-4000 system (Hitachi Medical, Chiba, Japan) to measure hemodynamic changes in oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb concentrations using 24 channels with a 0.1 s time resolution. Twelve channels each were assigned for measurements in the right temporal and the left temporal areas. Two wavelengths of near-infrared light (695 and 830 nm) were projected through the skull.

The fNIRS probes (Hitachi Medical) contained nine optical fibers (3×3 arrays) comprising five emitters and four detectors. The optical fibers were kept in place using a soft silicon holder. The distance between the emitters and detectors was set to 2 cm. Each pair of adjacent emitting and detecting fibers is defined as a single measurement channel.

The probes were placed over the same locations on the bilateral temporal areas centered at T5 and T6 according to the International 10–20 system [15] (see [9, 10, 13, 16–18], for other infant studies recoding from the same sites) (Fig 4).

Fig 4

Locations of the measurement channels.

The probes were placed on the left and right temporal areas centering at T5 and T6 of the international 10–20 system. The blue circles represent for detector, and the red circles represent for emitter. Each number correspond to the measurement channels.

When the probes were positioned, the experimenter checked to see whether the fibers were touching each infant’s scalp correctly. The Hitachi ETG-4000 system automatically detects whether the contact is adequate to measure the emerging photons for each channel. The channels were excluded from the analysis if adequate contact between the fibers and the infant’s scalp could not be achieved because of interference by hair.

Data analysis

Before conducting the data analysis, we determined the valid trials used for the statistical analysis. We excluded trials (1) when the infants did not look at the test stimuli for 5 s or became fussy, (2) when they looked back at the face of their parent’s face during the preceding baseline period, or (3) when movement artifacts were detected. Criteria (1) and (2) were detected by examining the infant’s behavior that recorded on the video. Criterion (3) was detected by the analysis of shape changes in the time series of raw data of oxy-Hb concentration.

The changes in oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb concentrations from individual channels were digitally bandpass-filtered at 0.02–2.0 Hz to eliminate longitudinal signal drift and high frequency noise owing to heartbeat pulsations [19]. We then averaged the oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb changes in each channel across the trials from 1s before the test period onset to 1 s after the test period, offset for each participant in a time series of 0.1 s time resolutions [9]. To normalize the mean concentrations in the time series of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb data, we calculated Z-scores at each time point during the cartoon female face and cartoon character face condition, for each channel of each participant. The Z-score (d) was calculated by subtracting the mean concentration of the baseline period (m) from the concentration at each time point during the test period (m), which was divided by the standard deviation of the concentration data during the baseline period (sd), as follows:

The 1 s immediately before the onset of each test trial was defined as baseline. The concentration changes measured by fNIRS were originally relative values and could not be averaged directly across participants. Normalized data such as the Z-scores, however, could be averaged regardless of the unit [20, 21].

Statistical analyses were conducted on these mean Z-scores for the oxy- and deoxy-Hb concentrations. To examine the channel showed greater activation for the cartoon female and cartoon character face comparing to the object (baseline), two-tailed one-sample t-tests vs. a chance level of 0 (baseline) were conducted for the mean Z-score in each of the 24 channels. Furthermore, to investigate the difference between presentation of the cartoon female and cartoon character face condition, we conducted two-tailed paired t-tests on the mean Z-scores.

Previous studies have shown that the infants’ hemodynamic responses typically lags behind stimulation and peak approximately 8–10 s after stimulus presentation [22-24]. This implies that, the dynamic response would reach peak response after the end of the 5-s presentation of test stimuli in the current study. However, in a pilot study that measured the hemodynamic response for a longer period, the data obtained after the presentation of the test stimulus were very noisy due to the infants’ body movements and, therefore they, were not suitable for analysis. Moreover, in several trials, we observed that many infants looked away from the LCD monitor immediately after the test trial offset and then looked back at the monitor again within a few seconds. Based on this observation, we performed statistical analysis against the mean Z-score of the last 1 s of the test trials to avoid data that included motion artifacts.

We obtained hemodynamic responses from ten 5- to 6-month-old infants who looked at the stimuli for more than three trials on both the cartoon female and cartoon character face conditions. The mean number of valid trials was 4.18 (SD = 1.11) for cartoon female face condition and 3.82 (SD = 1.03) for cartoon character face condition. There were no significant differences on the mean number of trials between the two conditions (p > .05, two-tailed).

Fig 5 shows the time course of average oxy-Hb concentration during the cartoon female face condition (the blue line) and the cartoon character face condition (the red line) in each of the 24 channels. We examined the channels activated in response to the cartoon female face condition and cartoon character face condition compared to baseline of 0. For each of the 24 channels, two-tailed one sample t-tests vs. a baseline of 0 were conducted for the mean Z-score of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb. Channel 23 showed a significant increase in the concentration of oxy-Hb (t (10) = 4.17, p < .01 after Bonferroni’s correction, d = 1.32). There were no channels showing significant changes in the concentration of deoxy-Hb (all ps> .10 after Bonferroni’s corrections). In the cartoon character face condition, there were no channels showing significant changes in the concentrations of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb (all ps > .10 after Bonferroni’s corrections). The greater activation compared to the baseline was found in the cartoon female face condition only in the channel 23.

Fig 5

The time course of average oxy-Hb concentration during the cartoon female and cartoon character face conditions in each of the 24 channels.

The blue line in the graph represents the mean Z score in the cartoon female face condition, and the red line represents that in the cartoon character face condition. On the horizontal axis, 0 represents the beginning of the test period and 5 represents the end of the test period. The shaded area represents the zone for the statical analysis, the last 1 s of the test period. In 23 channel, the concentration of oxy-Hb in cartoon female face condition were significantly greater than chance level of 0 and that in cartoon character face condition. *p < 0.05.

To investigate whether there is a significant difference in oxy- and deoxy-HB concentrations between presentation of cartoon female and cartoon character face condition in channel 23, we conducted a two-tailed paired t-test. We found that the concentration of oxy-Hb showed a greater increase in response to the cartoon female face condition than in response to the cartoon character face condition (t (10) = 6.15, p < .01, d = 1.94). There were no significant differences in deoxy-Hb concentration between presentation of cartoon female and cartoon character face condition in channel 23 (t (10) = 1.08, p > .10).

Discussion

This study investigated the face-specific activity to cartoon faces in infants. We examined the hemodynamic responses to cartoon female faces and cartoon character faces using fNIRS. Before conducting fNIRS experiments, we conducted behavioral experiments to examine whether infants prefer cartoon females to cartoon character faces using the preferential looking method.

The results of a behavioral experiment (Experiment 1) revealed that the 5- and 6-month-old infants preferred cartoon female faces in the upright but not inverted condition. The result of the fNIRS experiment (Experiment 2) revealed that the 5- and 6-month-old infants showed increased concentration of oxy-Hb for cartoon female faces but not for cartoon character faces in channel 23. These results mean that 5- and 6-month-old infants can perceive cartoon female faces, but not cartoon character face, as faces.

Since 2003, developmental studies using fNIRS in infants have revealed that it can detect cortical activation induced by various visual patterns [24], speech [25], objects [26], and faces [27]. Since 2007, fNIRS studies have reported that the temporal region of the brain is activated by faces in infants. Otsuka et al. investigated brain activity in response to upright and inverted faces in 5- to 8-month-old infants using fNIRS [8]. They examined the hemodynamic responses to upright and inverted faces and showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb and total-Hb increased significantly in the right lateral area during the upright face condition. Lloyd-Fox et al. examined social brain network activity in 5-month-old infants using fNIRS [28]. They measured the hemodynamic responses to faces and objects in the temporal regions and showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb increased only for faces. Nakato et al. investigated the brain activity of 5- and 8-month-old infants in response to frontal and profile views using fNIRS [9]. They found that the concentration of oxy-Hb and total-Hb in the right temporal regions increased only for frontal views in 5-month-old infants. The 8-month-old infants showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb and total-Hb in the right temporal regions increased for both frontal and profile views. These fNIRS studies suggest that the temporal region is specifically activated by faces, even in infants.

Previous studies have revealed that infants can perceive face-like objects as faces. Even newborns can detect face-like patterns. Valenza et al. investigated the ability of newborns to detect face-like patterns [29]. They showed that newborns preferred face-like patterns composed of elements with a face-like configuration over non-face-like patterns composed of elements with a non-face-like configuration. 3- and 4-month-old infants could detect a face in the two-tone images referred to as Mooney faces. Otsuka et al. showed that infants preferred upright over inverted Mooney faces [30]. 7- and 8-month-old infants could detect a face in Arcimboldo images [13]. Arcimboldo images are an imaginative portrait composed of fruits and vegetables. They investigated whether infants recognize a face in Arcimboldo images using the preferential looking technique and fNIRS. They showed that 7- and 8-month-old infants preferred upright to inverted Arcimboldo images. Additionally, they showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb increased in the left temporal area during the presentation of the upright Arcimboldo images in these infants. These studies compared the infants’ preference between a face configuration and a non-face configuration; however, no studies have investigated infants’ preferences between a human face and a non-human face. Our study is the first to compare the infants’ face-specific brain activity in response to a human and a non-human face, that is, a cartoon female face and a cartoon character face.

Grelotti et al. investigated brain activity in response to the human face and Digimon in two boys with autism using fMRI [6]. In an 11-year-old boy who had a special interest in Digimon, brain activity in his fusiform gyrus was induced by Digimon but not the human face. In a 17-year-old boy who did not have a special interest in Digimon, brain activity in his fusiform gyrus was not induced by either Digimon or the human face. According to their study, the human face could not induce activity of the FFA in either an 11-year-old or a 17-year-old boy with autism. The current study shows that the occipito-temporal regions of the 5- to 6-month-old infants activated for the cartoon female face, but not for the cartoon character face. To summarize the two studies, the human face could induce activity in typically developing infants, but not in juveniles with autism. Future studies could investigate abnormal brain activity in response to the human face in 5- to 6-month-old infants at risk due to being younger siblings of children with autism. This task may aid in the diagnosis of autism in the early infant period.

In our study, channel 23 could discriminate between the cartoon female and cartoon character face. In other words, the 5- and 6-month-old infants showed an increase in oxy-Hb concentration for the cartoon female face but not for the cartoon character face in channel 23. Previous fNIRS studies have also been suggested that channel 23 is activated for faces [9, 17]. Nakato et al. found that channel 23 showed an increase in oxy-Hb concentration for profile-view face presentations in 8-month-old infants [9]. Kobayashi et al. found that channel 23 showed a reduction in the concentration of oxy-Hb for the adaptation of identical faces in 5- to 6-month-old infants [17]. These studies revealed that channel 23 was involved in the perception of profile view and the representation of facial identity. In our study, we found that channel 23 showed an increase in oxy-Hb concentration for the cartoon female face. Our study indicates that the cartoon female face, but not the photographed female face, could induce activity in channel 23.

This study investigated whether infants showed face-specific brain activity in response to the cartoon face. We measured the hemodynamic responses of 5- and 6-month-old infants to cartoon female faces and cartoon character faces using fNIRS. The results showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb increased for cartoon female faces but not for cartoon character faces. Before conducting fNIRS experiments, we conducted behavioral experiments to examine whether these infants preferred cartoon female faces to cartoon character faces in the upright and inverted conditions. The results showed a preference for cartoon female faces in the upright but not inverted condition. To conclude, 5- and 6-month-old infants can perceive cartoon female faces, but not cartoon character faces, as faces. According to Gomez et al. [5], infants’ future extensive experience with cartoon character faces might induce face-specific brain activity.

Individual infants’ preference scores for cartoon female faces in the upright and inverted conditions (Experiment 1).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Individual infants’ Z-scores of oxy-Hb for cartoon female faces in each of channels (Experiment 2).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Individual infants’ Z-scores of oxy-Hb for cartoon character face faces in each of channels (Experiment 2).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Individual infants’ Z-scores of deoxy-Hb for cartoon female faces in each of channels (Experiment 2).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Individual infants’ Z-scores of deoxy-Hb for cartoon character face faces in each of channels (Experiment 2).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

14 Oct 2021

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Manabu Sakakibara, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

This research was financially supported by “Construction of the Face-Body Studies in Transcultural Conditions” (17H06343).

Please note that funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

This research was financially supported by “Construction of the Face-Body Studies in Transcultural Conditions” (17H06343).

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

6. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811918321098?via%3Dihub

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096511001858?via%3Dihub

The text that needs to be addressed involves the Result, Data Analysis, and Introduction sections.

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Comments:

A novel study presented in this manuscript however, many details are unclear, and the manuscript needs improvement. The results presented are interesting however, the sample size is very small.

Data analysis, Line 273:

It’s unclear what the authors mean by “raw oxy-Hb signal”. Where the changes in concentration calculated from the attenuation change data? If so, how was this done? Were in-house scripts used? What was the procedure? The use of just a band-pass filter seems highly minimal – did the authors not use any type of motion correction for the data as infant data can have many motion artifacts?

Could the authors also report the deoxy-Hb signal results? It is important to look at both the changes in oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb.

The authors need to improve the data analysis section in Experiment 2 to reflect the points above and the deoxy-Hb results need to be added in. As it stands, the data analysis section is confusing and it’s unclear what exactly is being shown. It’s also unclear why the authors chose to present “z-score” of the “raw signal” rather than changes in concentration.

Result, Line 315:

I believe that the statistical testing could be performed in a more accurate way. For example, rather than testing against 0, the mean z-score should be tested against the mean z-score in the baseline period. This would give a more accurate statistical comparison. Could the authors please repeat the statistical analysis?

Discussion

The work presented in this paper seems novel in that this specific effect has not been studied in infants before this study. However, besides restating the results, the authors don’t offer any discussion or explanation of their results. For example, Channel 23 was the only channel that showed significant activation – do the authors have a hypothesis about this? Why is this channel specifically important for these stimuli? Most of the discussion section reads as a literature review with lots of studies cited. The authors need to work on the discussion and weave in the studies to support their hypotheses and results as opposed to how it is currently written.

Reviewer #2: The authors investigated two face-stimuli-related experiments for 5- and 6-month-old infants. The behavioral one showed a preference for cartoon female faces in the upright, while another NIRS one showed that the concentration of oxy-Hb increased in the case of cartoon female faces. These results are, in general, interesting for readers. Some comments and suggestions should be considered in a modified version of the manuscript.

1. For any subject, the authors should obtain both behavioral measure data and NIRS imaging data simultaneously. Then, they should detect if there is correlative between behavioral and NIRS measurement.

2. The sample size is relatively small and there is a significant gender difference of sample. The authors should increase more samples in their study if possible.

3. The explanation of their results should be strengthened. More importantly, the mechanism underlying the current study should be discussed more deeply. In addition, it is expected to know if the current results can also be extended to infants with high risk of developmental disorder.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: Ref01.docx

Click here for additional data file.

26 Nov 2021

Reviewer #1: We have incorporated all of your comments into my revised manuscript. Thank you for your help.

Reviewer #2: We have incorporated all of your suggestions into my revision. Thank you for your comments.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer.docx

Click here for additional data file.

3 Jan 2022

Infants’ brain activity to cartoon face using functional near-infrared spectroscopy‎

PONE-D-21-19037R1

Dear Dr. Yamanaka,

The original reviewer #1 and this Academic Editor carefully reviewed the revision.  The external reviewer is satisfied with the revised manuscript, and I judged the revision is scientifically acceptable for publication in PLOS ONE.

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Manabu Sakakibara, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed all the points raised during the first review. I believe the manuscript is in a form to be accepted for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

25 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-19037R1

Infants’ brain activity to cartoon face using functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Dear Dr. Yamanaka:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Manabu Sakakibara

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE