| Literature DB >> 35171351 |
Qusai Ibrahim1, Rokhsareh Akbarzadeh2, Salem Gharbia3.
Abstract
Due to the rapid depletion of water resources, more interest is paid for the efficient desalination process in recent years. MoS2 membrane aroused attention due to its high mechanical stability and electronic properties, which can sustain extra-large strains. In this study, the electronic properties and water desalination performance of TiO2/MoS2-hexagonal, and TiO2/MoS2-rhombohedral nanocomposites bilayer membranes were studied and simulated for the first time. The effect of TiO2 in the performance of MoS2 was observed in water desalination under the defined applied pressure ranging from 50 to 250 MPa with a 6.4 Å pore diameter. The membrane structure is created and optimized. The energy minimized for TiO2 from - 19,596.4282 kcal/mol for the initial structure to - 19,605.1611 kcal/mol for the final structure. For TiO2/MoS2-hexagonal, the energy minimized from - 4955.54271 eV) to - 4955.62091 eV and TiO2/MoS2-rhombohedral from - 6042.26925 eV to - 6046.91835 eV. A molecular dynamic (MD) simulation was performed using Material Studio 2019 to study the electronic properties under 0-1 eV electric field using the CASTEP code. The results showed a better photocatalytic performance under the external electric field. The effect of external electric field significantly intensifies absorption in the visible range and achieved a high photocatalytic activity on TiO2/MoS2. TiO2, TiO2/MoS2-hexagonal and TiO2/MoS2-rhombohedral nanocomposites bilayer membranes are simulated and evaluated for the water desalination using ReaxFF software. Both MoS2 phases with TiO2 have achieved a high salt rejection up to 97% (P-value = 0.0036, R2 = 0.958), while TiO2/MoS2-rhombohedral achieved the highest permeability (6.0*10-8 mm g cm-2 s-1 bar-1) (P-value = 0.000296, R2 = 0.972) under 250 MPa applied pressure.Entities:
Keywords: Desalination; Membrane; MoS2; Molecular dynamics; Simulation; TiO2
Year: 2022 PMID: 35171351 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-022-05053-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Model ISSN: 0948-5023 Impact factor: 1.810