Yue Teng1, Yan Hao1, Hao Liu1, Mengjie Shan1, Qiao Chen1, Kexin Song2, Youbin Wang3. 1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 41 Damucang Hutong, Xicheng District, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 41 Damucang Hutong, Xicheng District, Beijing, China. wybenz@sina.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Using the keloid "epidermis" to cover a wound is widely used during treatment for keloids. Many flap terminologies have been used in literature. However, the definition of the flap is not well established. Here, we refined the definition of the flap and associated terminology and explored the survival mechanism of the 'flap' through histological analysis and blood supply studying. METHODS: Histology and vascular study of keloid was carried out with keloid and its surrounding normal skin tissue which were collected from keloid patients following keloid resection operations. The histological structures and thicknesses of epidermal and subepidermal of the keloids were analyzed and measured using hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining. Vascular density and blood perfusion in the subepidermal layer of keloids (KDS) were analyzed using CD31 immunohistochemical staining and a laser speckle contrast imaging system (LSCI), respectively. The vascular network in KDS was visualized by CD31 immunofluorescence staining and three-dimensional reconstruction. RESULTS: 29 pieces of keloid and its surrounding normal skin tissue sample from ten patients were collected. Keloid samples were about 2 cm wide and 5 cm long. The normal skin samples were about 2 to 3 mm in width. The thickness of epidermal layer of keloids was (136.4 ± 35.3) μm, and the thickness of epidermal layer of surrounding normal skin was (78.8 ± 13.9) μm. There was statistical thickness difference between the two layers, t(20) = 7.469, P < 0.001. The total thickness of keloid epidermal and subepidermal layers was 391.4 ± 2.3 μm. The vascular density (13.9 ± 3.4/field) and blood flow perfusion (132.7 ± 31.3) PU in KDS were greater than that of surrounding normal skin (7.8 ± 2.3/field, 73.9 ± 17.9 PU), P < 0.001. Horizontally distributed vessels with several vertical branches were observed in 3D vascular network reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The epidermal layer of keloid is thicker than that of surrounding normal skin. There is a vascular network structure under it. The vessels mainly locate at a depth of about 150 to 400 μm from the surface of keloid epidermis, randomly distribute and run parallel to the epidermis. Based on these characteristics which may ensure an adequate blood supply, we propose the concept of a "keloid subepidermal vascular network flap." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BACKGROUND: Using the keloid "epidermis" to cover a wound is widely used during treatment for keloids. Many flap terminologies have been used in literature. However, the definition of the flap is not well established. Here, we refined the definition of the flap and associated terminology and explored the survival mechanism of the 'flap' through histological analysis and blood supply studying. METHODS: Histology and vascular study of keloid was carried out with keloid and its surrounding normal skin tissue which were collected from keloid patients following keloid resection operations. The histological structures and thicknesses of epidermal and subepidermal of the keloids were analyzed and measured using hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining. Vascular density and blood perfusion in the subepidermal layer of keloids (KDS) were analyzed using CD31 immunohistochemical staining and a laser speckle contrast imaging system (LSCI), respectively. The vascular network in KDS was visualized by CD31 immunofluorescence staining and three-dimensional reconstruction. RESULTS: 29 pieces of keloid and its surrounding normal skin tissue sample from ten patients were collected. Keloid samples were about 2 cm wide and 5 cm long. The normal skin samples were about 2 to 3 mm in width. The thickness of epidermal layer of keloids was (136.4 ± 35.3) μm, and the thickness of epidermal layer of surrounding normal skin was (78.8 ± 13.9) μm. There was statistical thickness difference between the two layers, t(20) = 7.469, P < 0.001. The total thickness of keloid epidermal and subepidermal layers was 391.4 ± 2.3 μm. The vascular density (13.9 ± 3.4/field) and blood flow perfusion (132.7 ± 31.3) PU in KDS were greater than that of surrounding normal skin (7.8 ± 2.3/field, 73.9 ± 17.9 PU), P < 0.001. Horizontally distributed vessels with several vertical branches were observed in 3D vascular network reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The epidermal layer of keloid is thicker than that of surrounding normal skin. There is a vascular network structure under it. The vessels mainly locate at a depth of about 150 to 400 μm from the surface of keloid epidermis, randomly distribute and run parallel to the epidermis. Based on these characteristics which may ensure an adequate blood supply, we propose the concept of a "keloid subepidermal vascular network flap." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .