Literature DB >> 35169846

Ghost Lineages Highly Influence the Interpretation of Introgression Tests.

Théo Tricou1, Eric Tannier1,2, Damien M de Vienne1.   

Abstract

Most species are extinct, those that are not are often unknown. Sequenced and sampled species are often a minority of known ones. Past evolutionary events involving horizontal gene flow, such as horizontal gene transfer, hybridization, introgression, and admixture, are therefore likely to involve "ghosts," that is extinct, unknown, or unsampled lineages. The existence of these ghost lineages is widely acknowledged, but their possible impact on the detection of gene flow and on the identification of the species involved is largely overlooked. It is generally considered as a possible source of error that, with reasonable approximation, can be ignored. We explore the possible influence of absent species on an evolutionary study by quantifying the effect of ghost lineages on introgression as detected by the popular D-statistic method. We show from simulated data that under certain frequently encountered conditions, the donors and recipients of horizontal gene flow can be wrongly identified if ghost lineages are not taken into account. In particular, having a distant outgroup, which is usually recommended, leads to an increase in the error probability and to false interpretations in most cases. We conclude that introgression from ghost lineages should be systematically considered as an alternative possible, even probable, scenario. [ABBA-BABA; D-statistic; gene flow; ghost lineage; introgression; simulation.].
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35169846      PMCID: PMC9366450          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syac011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   9.160


  65 in total

1.  A Three-Sample Test for Introgression.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Mark S Hibbins
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Klaus Schliep
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A comparison of genomic islands of differentiation across three young avian species pairs.

Authors:  Darren E Irwin; Borja Milá; David P L Toews; Alan Brelsford; Haley L Kenyon; Alison N Porter; Christine Grossen; Kira E Delmore; Miguel Alcaide; Jessica H Irwin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Inferring Phylogenetic Networks Using PhyloNet.

Authors:  Dingqiao Wen; Yun Yu; Jiafan Zhu; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 9.160

5.  Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Simon H Martin; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra; Nicola J Nadeau; Camilo Salazar; James R Walters; Fraser Simpson; Mark Blaxter; Andrea Manica; James Mallet; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Lateral gene transfer from the dead.

Authors:  Gergely J Szöllosi; Eric Tannier; Nicolas Lartillot; Vincent Daubin
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Maintenance of Species Boundaries Despite Ongoing Gene Flow in Ragworts.

Authors:  Owen G Osborne; Mark A Chapman; Bruno Nevado; Dmitry A Filatov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Powerful Inference with the D-Statistic on Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Data.

Authors:  Samuele Soraggi; Carsten Wiuf; Anders Albrechtsen
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Phylogeny with introgression in Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae).

Authors:  Geneviève Leduc-Robert; Wayne P Maddison
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots.

Authors:  Daniel J Lawson; Lucy van Dorp; Daniel Falush
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Population genetics reveals divergent lineages and ongoing hybridization in a declining migratory fish species complex.

Authors:  Quentin Rougemont; Charles Perrier; Anne-Laure Besnard; Isabelle Lebel; Yann Abdallah; Eric Feunteun; Elodie Réveillac; Emilien Lasne; Anthony Acou; David José Nachón; Fernando Cobo; Guillaume Evanno; Jean-Luc Baglinière; Sophie Launey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.832

2.  Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades.

Authors:  Diego F Morales-Briones; Nan Lin; Eileen Y Huang; Dena L Grossenbacher; James M Sobel; Caroline D Gilmore; David C Tank; Ya Yang
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Ghost lineages can invalidate or even reverse findings regarding gene flow.

Authors:  Théo Tricou; Eric Tannier; Damien M de Vienne
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 9.593

4.  A need for standardized reporting of introgression: Insights from studies across eukaryotes.

Authors:  Andrius J Dagilis; David Peede; Jenn M Coughlan; Gaston I Jofre; Emmanuel R R D'Agostino; Heidi Mavengere; Alexander D Tate; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-07-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.