| Literature DB >> 35169626 |
Kenta Uchida1, Rachel Ng1, Samuel A Vydro1, Jennifer E Smith1,2, Daniel T Blumstein1,3.
Abstract
The benefits of dominance may not come without costs, particularly for males. For example, the "immunocompetence handicap hypothesis" states that males with enhanced mating success allocate resources to enhance reproductive output at a cost to their current health, whereas the "resource quality hypothesis" predicts that high-ranking males may benefit from increased reproduction and good health. Whereas the predictions from each have been well tested in captive animals and in a variety of highly social primates, fewer studies have been carried out in free-living, facultatively social animals. Using adult male yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer), we evaluated predictions of these hypotheses by examining the relationship between social rank and 2 health indicators-fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FCM) levels, and neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratios-after accounting for variation explained by age, body mass, and seasonality. We found that higher-ranking males tended to have a lower N/L ratio (reflecting good health) than lower-ranking individuals, whereas FCM levels were not significantly related to rank. In addition, heavier male marmots had lower N/L ratios, whereas body mass was not associated with FCM levels. We also found that older adult males had lower FCM levels (reflecting less physiological stress) but higher N/L ratios than younger adults. Finally, we found that FCM levels decreased as the active season progressed and FCM levels were associated with the time of the day. Overall, our results suggest that socially-dominant male marmots enjoyed better, not worse health in terms of lower N/L ratios.Entities:
Keywords: N/L ratio; immunocompetence handicap hypothesis; life history trade-offs; physiological stress; resource quality hypothesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 35169626 PMCID: PMC8836331 DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Zool ISSN: 1674-5507 Impact factor: 2.624
Independent variables explaining variation in FCMs levels of adult male yellow-bellied marmots
| Fixed effects: | Estimate |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 1.134 | 0.052 | 19.671 | 21.660 |
|
| Social rank | −0.015 | 0.015 | 149.954 | −0.985 | 0.326 |
| Age | −0.071 | 0.022 | 187.251 | −3.266 |
|
| Body mass | 0.026 | 0.023 | 145.578 | 1.131 | 0.260 |
| Day of year | 0.048 | 0.013 | 193.723 | 3.695 |
|
| Time of day | −0.038 | 0.019 | 43.908 | −2.042 |
|
| Conditional | Marginal | ||||
| 0.575 | 0.094 | ||||
| Random effects: | Variance |
| — | — | |
| Individual ID | (Intercept) | 0.003 | 0.052 | — | — |
| Year | (Intercept) | 0.029 | 0.170 | — | — |
Conditional and marginal R2 are shown. Significant values in bold.
Figure 1.The relationships between standardized fixed effects [(A) Social rank, (B) age, (C) body mass, (D) day of year, and (E) time of day.] and log-transformed FCM levels. Each line was calculated using the predicted probabilities from the linear mixed-effects model (LMM) (see text for details). Buffers represent the 95% confidence interval. P-values are reported from the LMM.
Independent variables explaining variation in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios in adult male yellow-bellied marmots
| Fixed effects: | Estimate |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 0.234 | 0.032 | 11.204 | 7.320 |
|
| Social rank | −0.026 | 0.015 | 74.174 | −1.798 | 0.076 |
| FCM levels | −0.012 | 0.017 | 63.824 | −0.696 | 0.489 |
| Age | 0.056 | 0.017 | 55.705 | 3.277 |
|
| Body mass | −0.047 | 0.020 | 95.871 | −2.365 |
|
| Day of year | 0.009 | 0.019 | 102.721 | 0.440 | 0.661 |
| Conditional | Marginal | ||||
| 0.103 | 0.466 | ||||
| Random effects: | Variance | SD | |||
| Individual ID | (Intercept) | <0.001 | 0.018 | — | — |
| Year | (Intercept) | 0.011 | 0.105 | — | — |
| Colony ID | (Intercept) | 0.000 | 0.021 | — | — |
| Residual | 0.017 | 0.132 | — | — | |
Conditional and marginal R2 are shown. Significant values in bold.
Figure 2.The relationships between standardized fixed effects (A) social rank, (B) FCM levels, (C) age, (D) body mass, and (E) day of year] and log-transformed N/L ratios. Each line was calculated using the predicted probabilities from the LMM (see text for details). Buffers represent the 95% confidence interval. P-values are reported from the LMM.