| Literature DB >> 35169625 |
Toni Mingozzi1, Pierpaolo Storino1, Giampalmo Venuto1, Alessandro Massolo2,3, Giacomo Tavecchia4.
Abstract
The increase in the average air temperature due to global warming has produced an early onset of the reproduction in many migratory birds of the Paleartic region. According to the "mismatch hypothesis" this response can lead to a decrease in the breeding output when the conditions that trigger the departure from the wintering areas do not match the availability of food resources in the breeding ground. We used 653 brooding events registered during the period 1991-2013 to investigate the link between climatic variables and individual breeding performance of a partially migratory passerine, the Rock Sparrow Petronia petronia, breeding at the altitude limit of its distribution. The laying date (LD) of the earliest first clutch was associated with local spring (minimum) temperatures but did not show a significant trend during the period considered. The LD of the latest first clutch had a positive and statistically significant trend, unrelated to local covariates and resulting in a longer breeding season (∼1.5 days/year). A longer breeding season allowed birds to produce more second clutches, which proportion increased from 0.14 to 0.25. The average breeding success was also positively correlated with the average temperature in July and with the duration of the breeding season. Contrary to expectations, the most important climate-dependent effect was a stretch of the breeding season due to a significant increase of the LD of the latest first-clutches rather than an earlier breeding onset. We show how climate changes act on bird populations through multiple paths and stress the need to assess the link between climatic variables and several aspects of the breeding cycle.Entities:
Keywords: Petronia petronia; breeding phenology; climate warming; long-term study; reproductive success
Year: 2021 PMID: 35169625 PMCID: PMC8836334 DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Zool ISSN: 1674-5507 Impact factor: 2.624
Figure 1.Location of the study area (black square) of the rock sparrow breeding population monitored from 1991 to 2013 in the Italian Western Alps. The main 3 breeding sites are highlighted.
Figure 2.Change in the average LD of first clutches (N = 406) of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013) in the Western Italian Alps. Solid line is the model assuming an effect of mean rainfall during the laying period (May and June; Model 1, Table 2). Dashed line indicates the expected values of a model assuming a temporal trend. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval.
Modeling the average LDs of 409 first-clutches through mixed linear models
| Model | Effects | n | BIC | ΔBIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | Constant | 4 | 2,807.571 | 6.62 |
| 6 | Rain_MJ+linear trend | 6 | 2812.363 | 11.41 |
| 2 | Linear trend | 5 | 2,812.805 | 11.85 |
| 7 | Temp_MJ+linear trend | 6 | 2,816.37 | 15.43 |
| 5 | Temp_MJ+Rain_MJ+linear trend | 7 | 2,816.953 | 16.00 |
| 4 | minTemp_J +linear trend | 6 | 2,817.455 | 16.51 |
| 3 | minTemp_MJ +linear trend | 6 | 2,884.70 | 17.39 |
| 8 | RainJ+linear trend | 6 | 2,818.607 | 17.66 |
| 9 | minT_J+RainJ+linear trend | 7 | 2,823.343 | 22.39 |
| 1 | Year | 24 | 2,862.706 | 61.76 |
Year (factors) was considered as a random variable together with nest identity. np, number of parameters in the model; ΔBIC = difference with the lowest BIC. Rain, mean rainfall; Temp, mean temperature, minTemp, minimum temperature; _MJ, May–June, _J, June, _M, May, _JL, July. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate. The model retained is in bold.
Modeling the proportion of SCs through logistic regression
| Model | Effects | n | AIC | ΔAIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 | RainJL+linear trend | 3 | 561.162 | 2.483 |
| 6 | TempJL+linear trend | 3 | 561.238 | 2.558 |
| 3 | TempMJ+linear trend | 3 | 561.447 | 2.768 |
| 0 | Constant | 1 | 561.556 | 2.876 |
| 8 | TempJL+Rain_JL+linear trend | 4 | 562.690 | 4.010 |
| 1 | Year | 22 | 563.050 | 4.371 |
np, number of parameters in the model; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion; ΔAIC, difference with the lowest AIC; Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May–June; rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May–June; temp_JL, mean temperature in July; rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate.
Figure 3.Change in the earliest (N = 22, empty symbols) and latest (N = 22, solid symbols) first-clutch LDs of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013). Straight gray lines indicate the linear trend of each series. The increasing trend over time of the latest first-clutch is statistically significant (see the text).
Figure 4.Proportion of second versus first clutches of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013, N = 558). Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval.
Figure 5.Upper panel: First clutches (N = 419) BS variation over the study area (range 0.625–1.00). Straight line indicates the linear trend. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval. Lower panel: BS according to average July temperature.
Modeling BS through general linear mixed models in which nest identity and year (as a factor) were considered as a random effect
| Model | Effect | n | BIC | ΔBIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 | RainMJ+linear trend | 5 | 309.88 | 4.001 |
| 3 | TempMJ+linear trend | 5 | 310.009 | 4.121 |
| 6 | LD | 5 | 311.012 | 5.124 |
| 12 | minTempMJ+linear trend | 5 | 311.186 | 5.298 |
| 8 | RainJL+linear trend | 5 | 311.904 | 6.016 |
| 11 | TempJL+TempMJ+linear trend | 6 | 320.157 | 6.327 |
| 9 | TempJL+RainJL+linear trend | 6 | 325.377 | 6.702 |
| 10 | TempJL+RainMJ+linear trend | 6 | 390.206 | 7.039 |
| 5 | TempMJ+RainMJ+linear trend | 6 | 314.301 | 8.413 |
| 0 | Constant | 2 | 315.063 | 9.175 |
| 2 | Year | 24 | 396.243 | 90.355 |
np, number of parameters in the model; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, difference with the lowest BIC; Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May and June; Rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May and June; Temp_JL, mean temperature in July; and Rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. Retained models are marked in bold. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate.
Modeling the number of fledgling in first clutches where at least 1 egg had hatched through linear mixed models in which nest identity and year were considered as a random effect
| Model | Effect | n | BIC | ΔBIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | Linear trend | 5 | 824.1599 | 7.1657 |
| 7 | TempJL+linear trend | 6 | 831.7372 | 14.743 |
| 5 | RainMJ+linear trend | 6 | 831.8683 | 14.8741 |
| 8 | RainJL+linear trend | 6 | 833.5796 | 16.5854 |
| 4 | TempMJ+linear trend | 6 | 833.8535 | 16.8593 |
| 10 | RainMJ+ RainJL+linear trend | 7 | 840.1814 | 23.1872 |
| 9 | TempJL+RainJL+linear trend | 7 | 840.334 | 23.3398 |
| 11 | TempJL+TempMJ+linear trend | 7 | 841.7367 | 24.7425 |
| 6 | TempMJ+RainMJ+linear trend | 7 | 841.7687 | 24.7745 |
| 3 | Year | 24 | 935.3414 | 118.3472 |
np, number of parameters in the model, BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, difference with the lowest BIC value. Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May and June; Rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May and June; Temp_JL, mean temperature in July; Rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. In bold, the model with the lowest AIC value. The model retained is in bold.