Literature DB >> 35169625

Climate warming induced a stretch of the breeding season and an increase of second clutches in a passerine breeding at its altitudinal limits.

Toni Mingozzi1, Pierpaolo Storino1, Giampalmo Venuto1, Alessandro Massolo2,3, Giacomo Tavecchia4.   

Abstract

The increase in the average air temperature due to global warming has produced an early onset of the reproduction in many migratory birds of the Paleartic region. According to the "mismatch hypothesis" this response can lead to a decrease in the breeding output when the conditions that trigger the departure from the wintering areas do not match the availability of food resources in the breeding ground. We used 653 brooding events registered during the period 1991-2013 to investigate the link between climatic variables and individual breeding performance of a partially migratory passerine, the Rock Sparrow Petronia petronia, breeding at the altitude limit of its distribution. The laying date (LD) of the earliest first clutch was associated with local spring (minimum) temperatures but did not show a significant trend during the period considered. The LD of the latest first clutch had a positive and statistically significant trend, unrelated to local covariates and resulting in a longer breeding season (∼1.5 days/year). A longer breeding season allowed birds to produce more second clutches, which proportion increased from 0.14 to 0.25. The average breeding success was also positively correlated with the average temperature in July and with the duration of the breeding season. Contrary to expectations, the most important climate-dependent effect was a stretch of the breeding season due to a significant increase of the LD of the latest first-clutches rather than an earlier breeding onset. We show how climate changes act on bird populations through multiple paths and stress the need to assess the link between climatic variables and several aspects of the breeding cycle.
© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Petronia petronia; breeding phenology; climate warming; long-term study; reproductive success

Year:  2021        PMID: 35169625      PMCID: PMC8836334          DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Zool        ISSN: 1674-5507            Impact factor:   2.624


The most common response to the recent global warming (IPCC 2013) by migratory birds in the Palearctic regions is a shift of their breeding phenology (Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Parmesan 2006; Bellard et al. 2012; Foden et al. 2013; Pacifici et al. 2015). Individuals tend to breed earlier than few decades ago (Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Dunn and Winkler 2010) especially in areas where spring temperature increased more markedly (Both et al. 2004). This plastic response is not always adaptive (Brown and Bomberger Brown 2000; Phillimore et al. 2016) as environmental clues that trigger spring migration might not correlate with those anticipating the peak of resources on the breeding areas, which could lead to a mismatch between food availability and food demand (Weatherhead 2005; Jonzén et al. 2007; Carey 2009; Both 2010; Visser and Gienapp 2019). The evolutionary consequences of this mismatch are difficult to predict and depend on several factors the most important of which is the migratory status and distribution of the species (Brown and Bomberger Brown 2000; Parmesan and Yohe 2003). Individual responses often involve a change in the migratory habit, that is, individuals become more resident, or in behavior, that is, indiviudals change their migratory route or speed (Forchhammer et al. 2002; Sparks et al. 2005; Jonzén et al. 2007). An early arrival can be beneficial (but see for costs Brown and Bomberger Brown 2000; Shipley et al. 2020). This is evident for those individuals living at the northern edge of the species’ breeding distribution where the short breeding season oblige a “fast breeding” strategy, chracterized, for example, by rapid laying after arrival, polygamy, and nest desertion (Pilastro et al. 2001; Root et al. 2003; Both et al. 2004; Crick and Sparks 2006). The increase in average temperature made also the distributions of many species to stretch, or shift, northward (Devictor et al. 2008; Auer and King 2014; Lenoir and Svenning 2014; Oliver and Morecroft 2014). If distribution shifts are well documented, the mechanisms involved are often unknown. Earlier egg laying—much more frequent in multiple brooding species (Dunn and Møller 2014)—is frequently associated with larger clutch sizes and greater production of young (Dunn 2004; Dunn and Winkler 2010). Revealing the link between individual breeding performance and climate is of pivotal importance in predicting the effect of climatic changes. Long-term individual-based studies offer the unique opportunity to address questions related to individual life-history strategy and climate variability (Clutton-Brock and Sheldon 2010; Tavecchia et al. 2017). Populations at the altitude limit of the species distribution, where climate change usually exerts more dramatic effects (Chamberlain et al. 2012; Scridel et al. 2018), are expected to exhibit a strong response to climate changes. At higher altitudes, the increase in temperature and the change in rainfall regimes have important cascading effects on the ecosystem (Hitch and Leberg, 2007; Novoa et al. 2008; Lehikoinen et al. 2014). However, the most evident change that birds living at their altitude limit experience is an increase in the duration of the breeding period, characterized by earlier snow melting and warmer summers (Francon et al. 2020). Investigating individual responses to these changes would uncover the constraints that climate imposes on species’ breeding distribution, at the same time revealing the environmental drivers of individual strategies. The Rock Sparrow Petronia petronia is a loosely colonial and cavity-nesting passerine, distributed from Southern Europe to Central Asia, in open habitats and under dry and sunny climatic conditions (Cramp and Perrins 1994; Mingozzi and Onrubia 1997). In Europe, this “southern” and heliophilous species (Lebreton 1975) breeds at low density in small groups near villages leading to a natural small and patchy structure of the population (Mingozzi and Onrubia 1997). In the Western Italian Alps, the Rock Sparrow breeds in a few internal valleys (continental xeric sectors), in small and isolated nuclei at the altitudinal limits of its European range (Cramp and Perrins 1994; Mingozzi et al. 1994). This population is a good biological model to assess the responses to climatic variations (Mingozzi et al. 1994; Pilastro et al. 2001; Tavecchia et al. 2002; Griggio et al. 2003). In such environmental conditions, breeding parameters and performances are expected to be more strongly influenced by variations in temperature and rainfall than in less marginal and more favorable sites for Rock Sparrow (see examples in Karvonen et al. 2012; Reif and Flousek 2012; Martin et al. 2014). Using long-term individual-based data on the Western Italian Alps populations, we aim to reveal the constraint imposed by the marginal environment. We investigated (1) a possible shift in the average laying date (LD) and (2) a possible trend in the earliest and latest observed LD; we also estimated (3) the duration of the breeding period, that is, the time between the earliest and latest clutch recorded; (4) the yearly proportion of second clutches (SCs), and (5) the association between breeding output (BO), that is, number of fledglings, and climatic factors. As found in many multiple-brood species (Halupka and Halupka 2017), we expected to find a progressive advance in the breeding onset and an increase in the breeding period. If a short breeding season prevented birds from laying an SC, we expected an increase in the proportion of SCs as a result of a longer breeding season. Finally, if a long season increased the number of clutches, we expected an increase in the total number of fledglings produced.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The study population was located in the Upper Susa Valley (Italian Cottian Alps, province of Turin; Figure 1), in an area of ∼13 km2 (municipalities of Sestriere and Cesana Torinese) between 1,350 and 1,800–2000 m above the sea level, characterized by xeric pastures and montane meadows on the right bank of the Ripa river with mountain slopes facing S and SW. Traditional agricultural practices as field cultivation (potatoes, cereals, and fodder crops), cattle grazing, and grass mowing were declining throughout the last decades following a widespread trend of agro-pastoral abandonment (Laiolo et al. 2004; Orlandi et al. 2016). A total of 24–52 nest boxes/year (average ± SD: 38.0 ± 4.6) were installed in 5 small villages for periods ranging from 9 to 22 years: 1991–2013, San Sicario (SS; 1,570 m a.s.l), and Champlas Janvier (CJ; 1,784 m a.s.l); 1991–2000, Champlas Seguin (1,780 m); 2005–2013, Champlas du Col (1,760 m a.s.l.), and Thures (TH; 1,720 m a.s.l.). The nest boxes (11 × 12 cm and 50 cm long with an oval entrance hole of 5 × 3 cm) were especially designed for this species and equipped to work, when necessary, as trapping devices (Mingozzi et al. 1994). Birds exhibit a marked preference for nest boxes versus natural nest in deep holes of building (Mingozzi et al. 1994). As a result, since 1994 all known natural nests have been abandoned and virtually all the population was breeding in artificial nest boxes.
Figure 1.

Location of the study area (black square) of the rock sparrow breeding population monitored from 1991 to 2013 in the Italian Western Alps. The main 3 breeding sites are highlighted.

Location of the study area (black square) of the rock sparrow breeding population monitored from 1991 to 2013 in the Italian Western Alps. The main 3 breeding sites are highlighted.

Data collection

During the period 1991–2013 (22 years), the nesting population was monitored every day from mid-May to the beginning of September, that is, from the start of nest building until the last nest fledged. Nest boxes were checked at 2-day intervals to measure reproductive and phenology population parameters (with the exception of 2009 in which the information on clutch number was missing). All breeding adults and nestlings were individually marked each year with a unique combination of 1 aluminum ring (numbered) and 3 plastic color rings (Mingozzi et al. 1994), so that bird identity and social pair bonds were daily ascertained on the field through direct observations. SCs were determined by identifying one or both members of the pair that have been found in another nest earlier in the season. Considering that nearly all breeding pairs in our study area were monitored, we assumed that unmarked breeding birds were immigrants from neighboring nesting sites, most likely from the larger population on the French side of the Alps (Tavecchia et al. 2002). Adults were measured and weighed immediately after capture and nestlings at 12 ± 1 days after hatching date. For each nest monitored, we considered the following parameters: the LD of the first egg (Julian) and the length of the breeding period (i.e., the difference in LDs between the earliest and the latest observed clutch). the proportion of SCs. the breeding success (BS; i.e., the probability of fledgling at least one chick). the yearly BO of successful nests ( i.e., the total number of fledged chicks each year).

Regional weather data

Climate data (1991–2013) were obtained from ARPA Piemonte (https://www.arpa.piemonte.it/rischinaturali/accesso-ai-dati/annali_meteoidrologici/annali-meteo-idro/banca-dati-meteorologica.html) and referred to a regional meteorological station located in Oulx-Gad (1,135 m a.s.l.), 9 km north of the study area. To avoid data dredging, we focused on temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) which are climatic variables known to affect bird phenology and reproduction success (Chambers et al. 2013; Dunn and Møller 2014; Martin et al. 2014). We calculated monthly mean and minimum values from daily during the laying period (May to June), and during the main brooding period (July). The minimum temperature in June had a clear increasing trend (minimum June temperature: βtrend = 0.101, t = 2.594, P = 0.017), but the other variables did not. The correlation between temperature and rainfall was not statistically significant in any of the periods considered (April: N = 22, r = −0.18; P = 0.405; May–June: N = 22; r = −0.23, P = 0.282, July: N = 22, r = −0.35, P = 0.114). To avoid building a large number of models with all possible combinations of explanatory variables, we assessed the influence of each covariate alone and added a second covariate only when the first one was statistically significant or close to be. We never assessed the effect of 3 covariates simultaneously (see also below). We also add year as a continuous covariate to account for possible trends, if any.

Statistical analyses

We began by analyzing the variation in the LD to assess variations in reproductive onset and termination along the study period. We focused on the extreme values of the earliest and latest clutches but first assessed whether these were representative of the whole distribution by assessing their correlation with the 10th and 90th percentiles (10thperc and 90thperc) of the LD distribution. Temporal variations in the earliest and latest LD and the length of the breeding period and their association with climatic variables were investigated by means of multiple regressions in program R (R Core Team 2018). In these analyses, the significance of each covariate (see above) was assessed by the estimate of its linear coefficient (t-distribution, α = 0.05). The proportion of SC versus first clutches was modeled through logistic regression by coding “0” and “1” the first and SCs, respectively. SCs were confirmed by the identity of at least 1 bird of the pair. Replacement clutches were excluded. As predictors of SC, we used year (first as a factor and subsequently as a continuous variable) and the weather covariates measured during the whole laying period (namely, May–June and June–July temperature and rainfall). We did not find evidence of extra-binomial variance (χ2536 = 559; P = 0.24, dispersion parameter = 1.04) and it was not considered further. As above, the significance of a specific covariate was assessed by the estimate of its linear coefficient (z-distribution, α = 0.05). The average LD, the BS, and the reproductive output (BO) were modeled through generalized linear mixed models using data from all known broods with known LD. In the analysis of the average LD, we only considered clutches between Days 145 and 187 to avoid outliers (“boxplot” procedure in program R) and meet the normality assumptions. In the other analyses all data were considered unless specified (see the “Results” section). The probability of BS, that is, the probability that at least one chick is fledged, was modeled as a binary response through logistic regressions. In this analysis, we also considered the LD (a linear as well as quadratic relationship) as a possible predictor of the BS. The quadratic term was added to investigate a possible optimum in the onset of the reproduction. This was not done for the climatic covariates because the species breeds typically in areas with higher spring and summer temperature and rainfall values. BO of each nest, that is, number of young fledged, was log-transformed (+1) and modeled through linear mixed models with normal error structure (note that mixed models with a Poisson error had singularity problems). The total number of fledged chicks produced each year was modeled using Poisson regression to assess for a possible trend. When comparing several competing mixed models, we used the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC; Burnham and Anderson 2002). The model with the lowest BIC value was considered as the best compromise between deviance explained and model complexity. Note that we preferred the BIC over the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) to guide the choice of generalized mixed models only, as it is more conservative (Burnham and Andreson 2002). Models within 2 point of BIC were considered equivalent. In all mixed models, we used nest identity and year as random effects. The first was used to account for the heterogeneity within the population, for example, the difference in quality across territories and/or among parents, and the second to correct for pseudoreplications that is, the nests within a given year are not independent. We did not consider bird identity because (1) some birds remained unknown, (2) the presence of polygamy and sequential nest desertion (Pilastro et al. 2001) would complicate results, (3) on average, individuals have been seen less than twice during the 22-year period (1.36 and 1.65 for females and males, respectively; Tavecchia et al. 2002), and (4) high-quality individuals tend to acquire high-quality territories (Sergio and Newton 2001) making the information partially redundant. Finally, when testing for the influence of weather covariates, we included a linear effect of time to correct for a possible spurious relationship induced by a temporal trend (Noriega and Ventosa-Santaulària 2007; Haest et al. 2018). Linear mixed models were implemented using the package “lmer” (Bates 2019). The significance of each covariate was measured by Wald tests (χ2-distribution).

Results

During the 22-year period, a total of 2,802 birds were ringed (228 adults and 2,574 nestlings) and an average of 29.8 ± 8.5 SD nests was monitored each year (range: 15–45). In the overall period (1991–2013), we recorded N = 653 brooding events, 430 of which were first clutches with known LD.

Average LD

To avoid biases due to extreme values, we kept only clutches with an LD between 145 and 187 (N = 409). The average LD changed significantly over the years (∼3 days over the whole period; Figure 2) but without a trend (βlinear_trend = −0.128, χ12 = 0.7912, P = 0.374; Table 1 and Figure 2). The model with the lowest BIC was the one assuming an effect of the average rainfall before and during laying (May–June; Model 11, Table 1, βrainfall_May = 2.85979, χ12 = 29.2940, P < 0.001). The other covariates were not significant. The difference across territories in the average LD was important (σnest_id: 3.85) indicating an additive role of territorial/bird quality in the variation of LD.
Figure 2.

Change in the average LD of first clutches (N = 406) of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013) in the Western Italian Alps. Solid line is the model assuming an effect of mean rainfall during the laying period (May and June; Model 1, Table 2). Dashed line indicates the expected values of a model assuming a temporal trend. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval.

Table 1.

Modeling the average LDs of 409 first-clutches through mixed linear models

ModelEffectsnpBICΔBIC
10 Rain_M+linear trend 6 2,800.949 0
0Constant42,807.5716.62
6Rain_MJ+linear trend62812.36311.41
2Linear trend52,812.80511.85
7Temp_MJ+linear trend62,816.3715.43
5Temp_MJ+Rain_MJ+linear trend72,816.95316.00
4minTemp_J +linear trend62,817.45516.51
3minTemp_MJ +linear trend62,884.7017.39
8RainJ+linear trend62,818.60717.66
9minT_J+RainJ+linear trend72,823.34322.39
1Year242,862.70661.76

Year (factors) was considered as a random variable together with nest identity. np, number of parameters in the model; ΔBIC = difference with the lowest BIC. Rain, mean rainfall; Temp, mean temperature, minTemp, minimum temperature; _MJ, May–June, _J, June, _M, May, _JL, July. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate. The model retained is in bold.

Change in the average LD of first clutches (N = 406) of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013) in the Western Italian Alps. Solid line is the model assuming an effect of mean rainfall during the laying period (May and June; Model 1, Table 2). Dashed line indicates the expected values of a model assuming a temporal trend. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval.
Table 2.

Modeling the proportion of SCs through logistic regression

ModelEffectsnpAICΔAIC
4 RainMJ+linear trend 3 558.679 0
2 Linear trend 2 559.454 0.775
9 TempMJ+linear trend 3 559.455 0.776
5 TempMJ+RainMJ+linear trend 4 560.550 1.871
7RainJL+linear trend3561.1622.483
6TempJL+linear trend3561.2382.558
3TempMJ+linear trend3561.4472.768
0Constant1561.5562.876
8TempJL+Rain_JL+linear trend4562.6904.010
1Year22563.0504.371

np, number of parameters in the model; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion; ΔAIC, difference with the lowest AIC; Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May–June; rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May–June; temp_JL, mean temperature in July; rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate.

Modeling the average LDs of 409 first-clutches through mixed linear models Year (factors) was considered as a random variable together with nest identity. np, number of parameters in the model; ΔBIC = difference with the lowest BIC. Rain, mean rainfall; Temp, mean temperature, minTemp, minimum temperature; _MJ, May–June, _J, June, _M, May, _JL, July. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate. The model retained is in bold.

Earliest and latest LD, duration of breeding period, and proportion of SCs

We used all first clutches (N = 430) with known LD to investigate the yearly variation in the earliest and latest first-clutch. Outliers were kept in the analysis because the normality assumption of the LD distribution within each year was no longer important, as for each year we only considered the earliest and latest first clutch. Although they influenced the overall distribution, the LDs of the earliest and latest first-clutch observed were correlated with the 10thperc and 90thperc of the distribution of LD (R2 = 0.83, t = 57.7, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.41, t = 21.35, P < 0.001, respectively), suggesting that extreme cases correctly represent the left and right tail of the distribution. The LD of the earliest clutch (Figure 3) advanced about 1 day every 3 years (∼3 days/decades) but the trend was not significant (N = 22, βtrend = −0.279, t = −1.506, P = 0.1477). The day of the earliest clutch showed a negative and significant association with May–June temperature (minimum temperature: βmin_tem  −3.01, t = −2.661, P = 0.015; average temperature: βtem  −2.84, t = −2.03, P = 0.056; note that as expected these 2 variables were correlated, R2 =  0.56, t20 = 5.11, P < 0.001) but independent of the mean rainfall for the same period (βrai = 2.492, t = 1.197, P = 0.245). In contrast, the LD of the latest first-clutch had a positive and statistically significant trend over time (βtrend = 1.304, t = 4.224, P < 0.001; Figure 3) but independent from the May–June covariates (βmin_tem = −1.9615, t = −0.913, P = 0.37; βtem = −2.701, t = −1.126, P = 0.273; βrai = 3.627, t = 1.106, P = 0.282). The difference between the earliest and latest first-clutch each year, that is, the length of first-clutch laying period, increased significantly over the study period (βlength = 1.599, t = 4.581, P < 0.001), from 12 days in 1991 to 46 in 2013 (∼1.5 days/year; Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Change in the earliest (N = 22, empty symbols) and latest (N = 22, solid symbols) first-clutch LDs of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013). Straight gray lines indicate the linear trend of each series. The increasing trend over time of the latest first-clutch is statistically significant (see the text).

Change in the earliest (N = 22, empty symbols) and latest (N = 22, solid symbols) first-clutch LDs of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013). Straight gray lines indicate the linear trend of each series. The increasing trend over time of the latest first-clutch is statistically significant (see the text). The proportion of SCs was estimated from 558 clutches, 112 of which (20%) were SCs. It varied markedly, ranging from 3% to nearly 40%, and showed a statistically significant increase over the study period (βtrend-prop_second_cl = 0.03, z = 2.00, P = 0.045; Table 2 and Figure 4). Despite several models assuming an effect of covariates had a similar AIC values (<2 points), none of the weather variables was significant or close to be, playing the role of “pretending variables” (Burnham and Anderson 2002). Indeed, the probability of SC was not associated to May–June weather (βmin_temp = −0.185, z = −1.411, P = 0.158; βtem = 0.011, z = 0.084, P = 0.933; βrai = −0.327, z = −1.663, P = 0.096, respectively), nor to July covariates (βtem = −0.042, z = −0.466, P = 0.641 and βrai = −0.103, z = −0.538, P = 0.593; Table 2).
Figure 4.

Proportion of second versus first clutches of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013, N = 558). Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval.

Proportion of second versus first clutches of the rock sparrow over the study period (1991–2013, N = 558). Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval. Modeling the proportion of SCs through logistic regression np, number of parameters in the model; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion; ΔAIC, difference with the lowest AIC; Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May–June; rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May–June; temp_JL, mean temperature in July; rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate.

BS and BO

BS was modeled by considering 419 first-clutches with known LD. It varied over the year, increasing from 0.72 (SE = 0.13) in 1992 to 0.92 (SE = 0.05) in 2010 and 1.00 during the last 3 years of the study (Figure 5). The model with the lowest BIC value (Table 3) was the one assuming a linear trend over the year (Table 3) but a model assuming an effect of the average July temperature had only a slightly larger BIC value and should be considered an equally good model (Table 3 and Figure 5). This covariate had a positive and statistically significant effect (βtemp_JL = 0.319, z = 2.25, P = 0.02). The length of the breeding period, that is, the interval between the earliest and the latest first clutch, was also significantly correlated with the annual BS (βlength = 0.0364, z = 2.799, P < 0.013), whereas the rainfall was not statistically associated in any of the 2 periods considered (βrain_MJ = −0.45967, z = −1.413, P = 0.158, βrain_JL = −0.04597, z = −0.148, P = 0.882, for May–June and July, respectively).
Figure 5.

Upper panel: First clutches (N = 419) BS variation over the study area (range 0.625–1.00). Straight line indicates the linear trend. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval. Lower panel: BS according to average July temperature.

Table 3.

Modeling BS through general linear mixed models in which nest identity and year (as a factor) were considered as a random effect

ModelEffectnpBICΔBIC
1 Linear trend 4 305.888 0
7 TempJL+linear trend 5 307.323 1.435
4RainMJ+linear trend5309.884.001
3TempMJ+linear trend5310.0094.121
6LD5311.0125.124
12minTempMJ+linear trend5311.1865.298
8RainJL+linear trend5311.9046.016
11TempJL+TempMJ+linear trend6320.1576.327
9TempJL+RainJL+linear trend6325.3776.702
10TempJL+RainMJ+linear trend6390.2067.039
5TempMJ+RainMJ+linear trend6314.3018.413
0Constant2315.0639.175
2Year24396.24390.355

np, number of parameters in the model; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, difference with the lowest BIC; Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May and June; Rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May and June; Temp_JL, mean temperature in July; and Rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. Retained models are marked in bold. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate.

Upper panel: First clutches (N = 419) BS variation over the study area (range 0.625–1.00). Straight line indicates the linear trend. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence interval. Lower panel: BS according to average July temperature. Modeling BS through general linear mixed models in which nest identity and year (as a factor) were considered as a random effect np, number of parameters in the model; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, difference with the lowest BIC; Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May and June; Rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May and June; Temp_JL, mean temperature in July; and Rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. Retained models are marked in bold. When testing for weather covariates, we included a linear effect of the year to account for possible trend of the covariate. The number of fledged chicks was modeled using 432 first-clutches in which at least one egg had hatched. The model with the lowest BIC was the one assuming a constant value, however, the average number of fledglings per nest increased significantly (χ12 = 7.31, P = 0.007) from 3.4 to 4.7 over the study period. The model assuming an association between the number of fledglings and the average July temperature has the lowest BIC among those including weather covariates (Table 4). The effect of this covariate was positive and close to be statistically significant (χ12 = 3.679, P = 0.055). The total number of fledglings produced by all monitored nests (N = 615) increased significantly over the study period (Poisson regression, βtrend = 0.0357, z = 11.05, P < 0.01, N = 22), from an average value of 93 fledglings produced during the first 5-year period (1991–1995) to 150 during the last one (2008–2013, note that 2009 was excluded).
Table 4.

Modeling the number of fledgling in first clutches where at least 1 egg had hatched through linear mixed models in which nest identity and year were considered as a random effect

ModelEffectnpBICΔBIC
1 – (constant) 4 816.9942 0
2Linear trend5824.15997.1657
7TempJL+linear trend6831.737214.743
5RainMJ+linear trend6831.868314.8741
8RainJL+linear trend6833.579616.5854
4TempMJ+linear trend6833.853516.8593
10RainMJ+ RainJL+linear trend7840.181423.1872
9TempJL+RainJL+linear trend7840.33423.3398
11TempJL+TempMJ+linear trend7841.736724.7425
6TempMJ+RainMJ+linear trend7841.768724.7745
3Year24935.3414118.3472

np, number of parameters in the model, BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, difference with the lowest BIC value. Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May and June; Rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May and June; Temp_JL, mean temperature in July; Rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. In bold, the model with the lowest AIC value. The model retained is in bold.

Modeling the number of fledgling in first clutches where at least 1 egg had hatched through linear mixed models in which nest identity and year were considered as a random effect np, number of parameters in the model, BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, difference with the lowest BIC value. Temp_MJ, mean temperature in May and June; Rain_MJ, mean rainfall in May and June; Temp_JL, mean temperature in July; Rain_JL, mean rainfall in July. In bold, the model with the lowest AIC value. The model retained is in bold.

Discussion

We found no evidence of a significant advance in the onset of the reproduction over the 22 years of the study. In contrast, there was evidence of a progressive increase in the length of the breeding season and of an increase in the frequency of SCs. We also found that the probability of nest success and the average number of fledglings produced increased significantly over the study period. Next success was significantly correlated with July temperature. The association of this covariate with the number of fledglings produced in first clutches was also positive and close to be statistically significant (P = 0.055). Despite reported as one of the most common response of numerous organisms to recent climate change (McCleery and Perrins 1998; Brown et al. 1999; Crick and Sparks 1999; Dunn and Winkler 1999; Matthysen et al. 2011; Dunn and Møller 2014), Rock sparrows did not advance the onset of the reproduction. Proximate causes of LD include multiple local factors such as precipitation (Leitner et al. 2003; Rodríguez and Bustamante 2003; Martin et al. 2014), photoperiod (Wingfield et al. 2003), local weather conditions (e.g., snow cover; Hendrics 2003 and temperature Phillimore et al. 2016), the quality, abundance and availability of food (Reed et al. 2013), age and endogenous factors (Goutte et al. 2010), and their interactions (Carey 2009). We found that breeding onset, that is, the average and earliest LD of first clutches, varied with May–June weather conditions, which can influence food availability (e.g., grasshoppers; Biddau et al. 1995). However, the covariates considered, with the exception of June minimum temperature, did not show a clear increasing trend over time (see also Fletcher et al. 2013; Lv et al. 2020 for similar results on Red Grouse Lagopus lagopus and Superb Fairy‐Wrens Malurus cyaneus, respectively). This contrasts with the long-term tendency of climate in the Alps (Gobiet et al. 2014), and was probably due to the relative short time series and the aberrant values of the LD distribution registered in 2008, for which we do not have a clear explanation. Also, topography, microclimate, orientation of slope, and type of plant cover can modulate the way in which climate warming influences biological responses (Durand et al. 2009). Tomás (2015) argue that hatching date should be a more reliable variable to study optimal timing of breeding than LD. We have focused on this latter for comparative purposes because many studies on bird phenology reported a shift in this parameter, especially for migratory birds (Crick et al. 1997). It is also possible that local spring snow cover, which largely depends on the very variable precipitations during late winter, sets a constraint to the onset of the reproduction (see also Hendrics 2003; Jenny and Kéry 2003; Scridel et al. 2018). However, we did not have quantitative snow cover data for the local population and we were not able to explore this potential proximate cause. The most important change that we found was a stretch of the breeding period represented by a significant delay of the latest first-clutches, leading to a statistically significant extension of the breeding period (∼1.5 days/year, see also Halupka and Halupka 2017). We recorded an increase in the proportion of SCs, likely due to this extension, and in the total number of fledged chicks in the population. This was in agreement with results from long-term studies on 24 populations of tits (Parus sp.) from 6 European countries that suggested a link between rising temperatures and the frequency of second broods (Visser et al. 2003). A delay in the LD of the latest first clutches can result from low-quality phenotypes or later arrivals that would have struggled to breed when breeding season was short. Further investigations using for example a measure of individual quality (e.g., Griggio et al. 2003) should be conducted to clarify this point. An increase in the frequency of SCs and on the average number of fledglings does indicate that birds were constrained by the short length of the breeding season during the early years. Climatic variables can play a different role according to the parameter considered (e.g., Mattyshen et al. 2011). This interplay can make difficult to generalize the impact of and the individual responses to climatic changes. Climate change has been shown to extend breeding period in multiple brood species of birds of ∼0.43 days/year (Møller et al. 2010), but in our case, and contrary to what previously thought, this extension is due to a progressive delay in the LD of the latest first clutches (Halupka and Halupka 2017). The earliest arrival and the average BS were associated to spring and summer temperature showing a clear positive relation with warmer weather, but these covariates did not explain the increasing LD of the latest clutches, responsible for the stretch of the breeding period. Similar results were found for the Superb Fairy‐Wren in which the breeding onset is associated with spring temperature but warmer temperatures did not result in earlier breeding over the year (Lv et al. 2020). In conclusion, climatic changes in the Alpine region are favoring the rock sparrow through a higher BS and a longer breeding period. Despite our population might be limited by the number of nest boxes, we expect an increase in the occupation rate and/or colonization of new areas. These changes are expected to play a role in slowing down the “fast breeding” strategy observed in the individuals of this population, characterized for example by a high frequency of polygamy and female nest desertion. Our results suggested that the low number of SCs recorded during the early years of the study resulted from a constrain due to the short breeding season (see also Pilastro et al. 2001). Further work should focus on other aspects of the breeding strategy of the rock sparrow, which can be potentially affected by an extended breeding period, such as, for example the frequency of nest desertion or the probability of permanent dispersal (Pilastro et al. 2001; Tavecchia et al. 2002).

Author Contributions

T.M. coordinated the project because of its inception and with A.M. and G.T. designed the experiments and analyzed the data. P.S. and G.V. collected the data (1999–2013) and contributed to data analysis. All authors edited and contributed to the article and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All authors have examined and agreed on the manuscript, have agreed to be listed, and contributed to the research reported. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The study complies with institutional, national, and international ethics guidelines concerning the use of animals in research and/or the sampling of endangered species. None of the procedures used in the study met the criteria to define them “experiments” as defined in Article 2 of the EEC Directive 86/609/EEC regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes.
  28 in total

1.  Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long-distance migrants, delays in short-distance migrants.

Authors:  Lukas Jenni; Marc Kéry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Climate change and the optimal arrival of migratory birds.

Authors:  Niclas Jonzén; Anders Hedenström; Per Lundberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough.

Authors:  Vincent Devictor; Romain Julliard; Denis Couvet; Frédéric Jiguet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  21st century climate change in the European Alps--a review.

Authors:  Andreas Gobiet; Sven Kotlarski; Martin Beniston; Georg Heinrich; Jan Rajczak; Markus Stoffel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 6.  The impacts of climate change on the annual cycles of birds.

Authors:  Cynthia Carey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Challenging a 15-year-old claim: The North Atlantic Oscillation index as a predictor of spring migration phenology of birds.

Authors:  Birgen Haest; Ommo Hüppop; Franz Bairlein
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  When to start and when to stop: Effects of climate on breeding in a multi-brooded songbird.

Authors:  Lei Lv; Yang Liu; Helen L Osmond; Andrew Cockburn; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Flexible reproduction in wild canaries is independent of photoperiod.

Authors:  Stefan Leitner; Thomas J Van't Hof; Manfred Gahr
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 2.822

10.  Identifying the world's most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals.

Authors:  Wendy B Foden; Stuart H M Butchart; Simon N Stuart; Jean-Christophe Vié; H Resit Akçakaya; Ariadne Angulo; Lyndon M DeVantier; Alexander Gutsche; Emre Turak; Long Cao; Simon D Donner; Vineet Katariya; Rodolphe Bernard; Robert A Holland; Adrian F Hughes; Susannah E O'Hanlon; Stephen T Garnett; Cagan H Sekercioğlu; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.