Literature DB >> 35169368

Redesigning Primer of ITS2 (Internal Transcribed Spacer 2) for Specific Molecular Characterization of Malaria Vectors Anopheles Species.

Kartika Senjarini1, Muhammad Khalid Abdullah1, Nuril Azizah1, Miatin Alvin Septianasari1, Ahmad Tosin1, Rike Oktarianti1, Syubbanul Wathon1, Tri Yudani Mardining Raras2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anopheles mosquitoes are vectors of malaria, which is a serious health issue in Indonesia. Thus, vector control is an important approach taken to overcome this disease. The first and most important step in vector control is vector identification. As some Anopheles species share similar morphological features, molecular identification helps make the process more accurate by using specific DNA sequences as molecular markers such as Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2). Many of the available ITS2 primers are universally designed for insects and, as such, are typically less specific for identifying certain genera, such as Anopheles sp. Therefore, redesigning a specific ITS2 primer is needed for specific Anopheles identification.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to redesign a specific PCR primer for Anopheles species.
METHODS: The redesigned primer, named sma-ITS2, was then tested using mosquito samples from the Anopheles genus and other genera. Each mosquito was identified morphologically and their genomes were extracted. DNA samples were then amplified using the redesigned primer.
RESULTS: The sma-ITS2 primer pair was capable of amplifying ITS2 sequences from all of the Anopheles samples and unable to amplify any of the non-Anopheles samples, suggesting that it is specific to Anopheles only. ll Anopheles samples were also able to be identified, only An. indefinitus were not able to be separated from its complex species, An. vagus.
CONCLUSION: The sma-ITS2 primer pair was able to identify intra-species of Anopheles, but its efficiency in making differentiations within a species complex should be evaluated further.
© 2021 Kartika Senjarini, Muhammad Khalid Abdullah, Nuril Azizah, Miatin Alvin Septianasari, Ahmad Tosin, Rike Oktarianti, Syubbanul Wathon, Tri Yudani Mardining Raras.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles; ITS2; Malaria; Primer; Vector

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35169368      PMCID: PMC8802678          DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.418-423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arch        ISSN: 0350-199X


BACKGROUND

Malaria is a life-threatening disease in many tropical countries, and there was an estimated 229 million cases of the disease in 2019 (1). Most cases occur in children under five years age (2). Malaria is caused by Plasmodium sp. (3) which is transmitted to humans via the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito (4). Vector control can reduce malaria transmission by reducing the vector population and the amount of contact between vector and host. Vector control for malaria is commonly conducted both biologically and chemically. For instance, indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated bed nets are examples of chemically-based, vector control methods (5, 6). However, there are numerous reports of vector resistance to insecticides (7). Furthermore, different species or subspecies within the Anopheles species complex may exhibit different behaviors related to malaria transmission, which could complicate the proper vector control methods needed. For example, Anopheles gambiae is species complex composed of distinct species, some of which are human feeders while others are not. An. gambiae is known as anthropophilic and endophagic, while the other type are more exophagic and exophilic (8, 9). Therefore, an understanding of the basic bionomic information and vectorial capacity of Anopheles is important, and Anopheles species identification is necessary for the vector control of malaria (7). Anopheles identification can be conducted both morphologically and molecularly. Morphological identification is typically accomplished by distinguishing Anopheles in terms of their antennae, palpus, proboscis, and the venation of the wings, legs, etc. (10, 11). However, low-quality specimens and the presence of a species complex within the Anopheles genera that have shared, indistinguishable morphological features has resulted in the misidentification of species (12). Given the limitations of morphological identification, it is desirable to undertake molecular identification to accurately identify specific vectors and associate them with specific behaviors to further support vector control (13). Ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) is a conserved DNA sequence commonly used as a molecular marker to differentiate (14) and reconstruct the phylogeny of the Anopheles species complex (15) due to its high interspecific and low intraspecific variability (16). However, performance evaluations of commonly used ITS2 primers for Anopheles sequences have shown biased results. The available ITS2 primers are universally designed for insects and are unable to amplify the ITS2 sequence of Anopheles from different geographic locations.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to redesign a specific ITS2 primer for Anopheles sequences that would support molecular identification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Primer redesign The local sequence collections of Anopheles, i.e., An. vagus, An. subpictus, An. sundaicus, An. aconitus, An. maculipennis, An. daciae, An. barbirostris, and An. kochi were initially aligned in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST. Seven sequences with the highest query covers were selected from the BLAST results and used as a DNA template. Redesigning the new ITS2 primer was conducted by using an online primer-BLAST tool in NCBI. Each of the input sequence created a primer candidate. Qualifications used to select the best primer included sequence lengths of 18-24 base pairs (bp), the absence of self-complementarity (from which it is possible to form hairpin and dimer structures), a GC content of 40-60%, the absence of thymine at the 3’ end of the primer sequence, and similar melting temperatures for the forward and reverse primers (17). Mosquito sampling Mosquitoes were collected from Bangsring village, Banyuwangi district, East Java province, Indonesia, which is a rural area close to the seashore. The global positioning system coordinates are 8°04’48.1”S 114°25’01.1”E. The larvae of Anopheles were collected at a nearby lagoon that was used as a breeding site for Anopheles mosquitoes. Adult mosquitoes were collected using an aspirator during feeding time (from 20.00 to 02.00 (UTC+7) and kept in a sealed cup. Adult mosquitoes were identified based on morphological characteristics using O’Connor’s and Reid identification keys (10, 11). Larvae were brought to a field insectary and raised to adulthood. Molecular identification To confirm the availability of the redesigned primer, Anopheles sequences were amplified using the redesigned primer. The genome was extracted by incubating the bodies of 5 adult Anopheles specimens in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes in 400 μL of homogenizing buffer (Tris-CL 10 mM, EDTA 2 mM, NaCl 0.4 M) and homogenized using a micropestle. Then, 40 μL of 20% SDS and 8 μL of 20 mg/ml Proteinase-K was added to the tubes, which were then incubated at 65 ° C for 1 hour. Following incubation, 300 μL of homogenized 6 M NaCl was added and the suspension centrifuged for 30 minutes at 4 ° C and 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was then transferred to a new tube. Isopropanol was added and the supernatant was stored in a freezer at -20 ° C for 1 hour, after which it was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 4 ° C and 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was removed, and the pellets containing DNA were washed using 70% ethanol. These were dried using a desiccator and rehydrated with ddH2O. The extracted genomes were then amplified using the new, redesigned primer. A 25 μL PCR cocktail containing 0.5 pmol PCR master mix (12.5 μL), 9 μL of aqua-bidest, 1.25 μL of each forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL of DNA template was used. The amplification was performed at 95 ° C for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of amplification, denaturation at 95 ° C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55 ° C for 30 seconds, extension at 72 ° C for 45 seconds, and a final extension at 72 ° C for 7 minutes. The extracted genomes were visualized via electrophoresis on 8% agarose for 30 minutes at 100 V. The electrophoresis process was conducted in TAE buffer (Tris, glacial acetic acid, and EDTA). The amplicons were purified using the Wizard SV Gel Kit and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). The purified amplicons were then sequenced using the Sanger method at 1st Base in Singapore. Sequence analysis The sequences were processed using Bio-Edit software (Nucleics, Sydney, Australia) to edit illegible sections at the beginning and end of the sequences. Consensus sequences were then generated. Sequence alignment was conducted using ClustalX2 software (Informer Technologies Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA). The consensus sequences were aligned using BLAST in NCBI to confirm their identities. These data were then used to construct a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstrap values using MEGA X.

RESULTS

The sma-ITS2 primer Five pairs of forward and reverse primers were generated (Table 1). Primer pair 1 was chosen for several advantageous characteristics. This primer pair’s self-3-complementarity value was 0, thus it was impossible for a dimer structure to form, hence the DNA amplification process would not be disturbed. Primer pair 1 had the lowest self 3-complementarity value among the primer candidates, a suitable guanine-cytosine (GC) content value, and a low melting temperature difference between the forward and reverse primers. Primer pair 1 (forward primer) was named sma-ITS2F (5’AGG ACA CAT GAA CAC CGA CA 3’) and the reverse primer was named sma-ITS2R (5’ TTG AGG CCT ACT GGA ATG TGG 3’). The GC content of sma-ITS2F and sma-ITS2R was 50% and 52.38%, respectively.
Table 1.

Five pair designed ITS2 primer. Note : Forward primer (F); Reverse primer (R); Temperature melting (Tm)

PrimerSequence (5’ → 3’)LengthAmplicon lengthTmGC%Self-complimentary3’ self complimentary
F1AGGACACATGAACACCGACA2065459.2450.004.000.00
R1TTGAGGCCTACTGGAATGTGG2159.7252.386.000.00
F2ACCGACACGTTGAACGCATA2065460.3250.007.003.00
R2AGTCACACATCACTTGAGGC2057.8250.004.002.00
F3TGCAGGACACATGAACACCG2065460.8855.004.002.00
R3AGGCCTACTGGAATGTGGTTT2159.2947.626.000.00
F4ACATGAACACCGACACGTTG2065559.0750.004.003.00
R4CATCACTTGAGGCCTACTGGA2159.1752.386.002.00
F5CACATGAAACACCGACCGTT2065459.0750.004.002.00
R5TCACTTGAGGCCTACTGGAA2057.9850.006.001.00
The forward and reverse primers we chose had a melting temperature difference of 0.48 °C. The forward primer was also chosen based on the absence of thymine at the 3’ end, which was present on the other 4 candidates. A comparison between the ITS2 primer sequences according to different PCR conditions is listed in Table 2. All of the forward primers in Table 2 (including our redesigned primer) have the same nucleotide sequence part: AGGACA. The presence of the exact same nucleotide sequence indicates that it is universally present in Anopheles. Therefore, this particular sequence was considered essential for the ITS2 Anopheles primers. In addition, there was a sequence part found in all reverse primers: GCTTAAATT. This sequence was not found our redesigned primer nor in any of the other four primer candidates. There were small differences in the PCR settings for each primer that were made based on the different properties of each primer.
Table 2.

The comparison of primer sequences and PCR settings between sma-ITS2 and previously designed primers.

Primer sequence (5’ → 3’)CodePCR conditionSample usedReference
AGGACACATGAACACCGACA sma-ITS2FPredenaturation: 95 °C; 5”Denaturation: 95 °C; 30”Annealing: 54 °C; 30”Extension: 72 °C; 45”Final extension: 72 °C; 7’35 cycles An. vagus vagus An. vagus limosus An. sundaicus An. indefinitus This study
TTGAGGCCTACTGGAATGTGGsma-ITS2R
TGTGAACTGCAGGACACATITS2APredenaturation: 95 °C; 1’Denaturation: 95 °C; 30”Annealing: 51 °C; 30”Extension: 72 °C; 1’Final extension: 72 °C; 10’35 cycles An. barbirostris An. campestri An. dissidens An. saeungae An. wejchoochotei (17)t
TATGCTTAAATTCAGGGGGTITS2B
TGTGAACTGCAGGACACATITS2aPredenaturation: 94 °C; 3’Denaturation: 94 °C; 30”Annealing: 55 °C; 30”Extension: 72 °C; 1’Final extension: 72 °C; 10’35 cycles An. gambiae An. quadrimaculatus An. punctulatus An. maculipennis An. funestus (18)
TATGCTTAAATTCAGGGGGTITS2b
TGTGAACTGCAGGACACATITS2APredenaturation: 94 °C; 2’Denaturation: 94 °C; 30”Annealing: 50 °C; 30”Extension: 72 °C; 40”Final extension: 72 °C; 10’40 cycles An. minimus An. aconitus An. varuna An. pampanai (19)
TATGCTTAAATTCAGGGGGTITS2B
TGTGAACTGCAGGACAITS2APredenaturation: 94 °C; 5’Denaturation: 94 °C; 1’Annealing: 51 °C; 1’Extension: 72 °C; 2’Final extension: 72 °C; 10’35 cyclesAn. cracensAn. maculatusAn. karwariAn. barbirostrisAn. sinensis (20)
TATGCTTAAATTCAGGGGGTITS2B
Morphological characteristics of malaria vector Three species of Anopheles mosquitoes were identified: An. vagus, An. sundaicus, and An. indefinitus. An. vagus was identified and separated into two subspecies: An. vagus vagus and An. vagus limosus (Table 3). The characteristics of each identified individual matched manual guidebooks (10,11).
Table 3.

Morphological characteristics of Anopheles sp. from Bangsring, Banyuwangi District. Note : pale band (pb); subapical dark band (sd); subapical pale band (sp); prehumeral (ph); femur (f); tibia (t)

SpeciesHeadWingLeg
An. vagus vagus
An. vagus limosus
An. sundaicus
An. indefinitus
Molecular characteristics of malaria vector The genomes from Anopheles, Aedes, Culex, and Armigeres samples were successfully extracted using the salting-out method. All samples had genome sizes above 10,000 bp. The PCR assay used on the Anopheles samples using the sma-ITS2 primer demonstrated that amplification worked well. The electrophoresis assay of the PCR products showed single DNA bands for each sample, with sizes ranging from 550 bp to 660 bp. The estimated sizes of the DNA bands from An. vagus vagus, An. vagus limosus, An. indefinitus, and An. sundaicus were 630 bp, 660 bp, 645 bp, and 550 bp, respectively (Figure 1a). These DNA bands were expected to be the ITS2 sequences. The electrophoresis assay on the PCR products of Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Culex sp., and Armigeres sp. showed no DNA bands from these samples on the agarose gel. The only DNA band that did appear was from An. vagus vagus (the positive control) (Figure 1b).
Figure 1.

The PCR products of all samples using sma-ITS2 primer

The exact size of each sequence was known after sequencing and aligning the samples. The ITS2 sequence length of An. vagus vagus, An. vagus limosus, An. indefinitus, and An. sundaicus were 625 bp, 655 bp, 646 bp, and 551 bp, respectively. All ITS2 sequences in this study are still in the process of being submitted to NCBI. A species was considered to be accurately identified when the query sequence matched sequences from GenBank that had the same species name and the highest statistical match. The query and matching sequences are shown in Table 4. The An. vagus vagus query sequence showed the highest similarity, with two sequences from the same species: An. vagus FJ654649.1 and An. vagus MN203100.1. The An. sundaicus query sequence also showed high similarity with two GenBank sequences within the same species: An. sundaicus GQ284825.1 and An. sundaicus AY768541.1. A neighbor-joining tree demonstrated that the An. sundaicus sequence grouped in one clade with the other two An. sundaicus sequences from GenBank.
Table 4.

The query sequences obtained by sequencing and their matching GenBank sequences

Sample sequenceDescriptionMax. ScoreQuery CoverPercent IdentityAccession Number
An. vagus vagusAn. vagus 118899%0.0FJ654649.1
An. vagus116899%0.0MN203100.1
An. vagus limosusAn. vagus limosus119799%0.0MW319822.1
An. vagus limosus119999%0.0MW314227.1
An. sundaicusAn. sundaicus1003100%0.0GQ284825.1
An. sundaicus1003100%0.0AY768541.1
An. indefinitusAn. vagus116699%0.0MN203100.1
An. vagus116099%0.0FJ654649.1
The An. vagus limosus query sequence showed the highest similarity with two sequences from the same species, but different subspecies: the first was An. vagus limosus MW319822.1 and the latter was An. vagus vagus MW314227.1. The An. indefinitus query sequence showed the highest similarity with An. vagus MN203100.1 and FJ654649.1. This result indicates that the An. sundaicus sample was related to the other two An. sundaicus samples from GenBank as the same species. Meanwhile, the other samples: An. vagus vagus, An. vagus limosus, and An. indefinitus formed a single clade with the remainder of the GenBank sequences. Hence, the neighbor-joining tree failed to separate these samples into distinct species. In addition, there were no clear boundaries between the An. vagus vagus and An. vagus limosus GenBank sequences (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Neighbor-Joining Phylogenetic Tree of identified Anopheles by using primer sma-ITS2

DISCUSSION

The sma-ITS2 primer If the self 3-complementarity value is higher than 0, one or more dimer structures could appear. There are 2 types of dimer structures: a self dimer and a cross dimer. Self dimers occur when a primer binds with another primer of the same type. Cross dimers occur when primer pairs (forward and reverse primers) bind to one another (21). Typically, the GC content value for a functional primer is between 45% and 60% (22). The GC content value influences the melting and annealing temperature. A GC content value that is too high could result in a high DNA melting temperature, as there are 3 hydrogen bonds between guanine and cytosine nitrogen bases whose separation requires a high temperature (22). The optimum annealing temperature is usually 5 °C below the melting temperature; therefore, if the GC content value of the primer is too high, the target sequence will not amplify well. In contrast, if the GC content of the primer is too low, the melting and annealing temperatures will also be low. This can cause the primer to bind randomly and non-specifically to a target sequence. The presence of at least one thymine at the 3’ end could have caused a mismatch or led to hairpin structures that would have disrupted the amplification process (21). Molecular characteristics of malaria vector A previous study (22) found that the ITS2 length of Anopheles ranged from 398 to 506 bp. This result indicates that the primer was able to amplify the ITS2 from Anopheles in this research but not capable of amplifying the ITS2 sequences of the non-Anopheles mosquitoes. The inability of sma-ITS2 to amplify the ITS2 sequence of the non-Anopheles samples was due to the absence of a suitable sequence to bind to the primer. Based on the alignment results between the ITS2 sequence of Anopheles and the non-Anopheles samples from GenBank using ClustalX2 software (Informer Technologies, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA) a considerable difference in the nucleotide composition between ITS2 in Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes was observed. Furthermore, a substantial length difference in the ITS2 sequence between Anopheles and non-Anopheles mosquitoes is known to exist. This limits the primer’s ability to initiate amplification of the sequences. Our results suggests that the primer accurately identified the species of these two samples based on the ITS2 sequence. This has been also confirmed by the phylogenetic tree constructed based on this ITS2 sequences. Neighbor-joining is an algorithm used for the construction of phylogenetic trees using a method that bases the amount of difference between two sequences to construct a tree (23). An. vagus vagus, An. vagus limosus, and An. indefinitus are, along with several other species, members of the An. subpictus complex. A species complex is a group of closely related organisms that are similar in appearance and often have unclear boundaries between them. Members of the An. subpictus complex have exhibited different bio-ecological traits such as susceptibility to common insecticides, salinity tolerance, and vectorial capacity (24). The nucleotide substitution rates among the sequences within this clade were very low (or none), indicating that there was a very small amount of nucleotide substitution within the ITS2 sequences of this species. Based on the alignment results, there were only two nucleotides that differed between the sequences belonging to An. indefinitus and An. vagus vagus and An. vagus limosus. Meanwhile, An. vagus vagus and An. vagus limosus had no nucleotide differences between their sequences. Furthermore, there was only one ITS2 sequence for An. indefinitus registered in GenBank, which had accession number GQ870332 and was from the Philippines. When this sequence was tested with Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), it showed the highest similarity to the An. vagus GQ480823.1 sequence from East Timor. Given these results, further analysis based on the morphological and molecular characteristics of An. indefinitus is needed. Previous studies have shown that a redesigned ITS2 primer can distinguish between closely related Anopheles mosquitoes, including species complexes (16-18, 25). A redesigned primer has also identified several species - previously described as distinct species - as a single species (20). This is similar to the case of An. vagus and An. indefinitus identification using our primer. One solution that has been proposed to solve this issue is to use other molecular markers such as Cytochrome C Oxidase 1 to compare the identification results between molecular markers (12). Further analysis could be then conducted based on those results.
  19 in total

1.  Analysis of the phylogenetic relationship of Anopheles species, subgenus Cellia (Diptera: Culicidae) and using it to define the relationship of morphologically similar species.

Authors:  Amitav Mohanty; Sunita Swain; Santanu K Kar; Rupenangshu K Hazra
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.342

2.  Molecular Characterization Reveals Diverse and Unknown Malaria Vectors in the Western Kenyan Highlands.

Authors:  Brandyce St Laurent; Mary Cooke; Sindhu M Krishnankutty; Puji Asih; John D Mueller; Samuel Kahindi; Elizabeth Ayoma; Robin M Oriango; Julie Thumloup; Chris Drakeley; Jonathan Cox; Frank H Collins; Neil F Lobo; Jennifer C Stevenson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  A note on Anopheles subpictus Grassi and A. indefinitus Ludlow (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  J A Reid
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  A single multiplex assay to identify major malaria vectors within the African Anopheles funestus and the Oriental An. minimus groups.

Authors:  Claire Garros; Lizette L Koekemoer; Maureen Coetzee; Marc Coosemans; Sylvie Manguin
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of five species of the Anopheles barbirostris complex in Thailand.

Authors:  Laura Brosseau; Chanya Udom; Chutipong Sukkanon; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Michael J Bangs; Atiporn Saeung; Sylvie Manguin
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 6.  Eliminating malaria vectors.

Authors:  Gerry F Killeen; Aklilu Seyoum; Chadwick Sikaala; Amri S Zomboko; John E Gimnig; Nicodem J Govella; Michael T White
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Phylogenetic study of six species of Anopheles mosquitoes in Peninsular Malaysia based on inter-transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) of ribosomal DNA.

Authors:  Jia-Siang Sum; Wenn-Chyau Lee; Amirah Amir; Kamil A Braima; John Jeffery; Noraishah M Abdul-Aziz; Mun-Yik Fong; Yee-Ling Lau
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Risk factors of malaria in children under the age of five years old in Uganda.

Authors:  Danielle Roberts; Glenda Matthews
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Molecular phylogeny of Anopheles hyrcanus group members based on ITS2 rDNA.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; Wen-Qi Shi; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  DNA barcoding of morphologically characterized mosquitoes belonging to the subfamily Culicinae from Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Thilini Chathurika Weeraratne; Sinnathamby Noble Surendran; S H P Parakrama Karunaratne
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.