| Literature DB >> 35169220 |
Muhammad Bilal1, Anwar Saeed2, Taza Gul1, Wiyada Kumam3, Safyan Mukhtar4, Poom Kumam5,6.
Abstract
The energy transmission through micropolar fluid have a broad range implementation in the field of electronics, textiles, spacecraft, power generation and nuclear power plants. Thermal radiation's influence on an incompressible thermo-convective flow of micropolar fluid across a permeable extensible sheet with energy and mass transition is reported in the present study. The governing equations consist of Navier-Stokes equation, micro rotation, temperature and concentration equations have been modeled in the form of the system of Partial Differential Equations. The system of basic equations is reduced into a nonlinear system of coupled ODE's by using a similarity framework. The numerical solution of the problem has been obtained via PCM (Parametric Continuation Method). The findings are compared to a MATLAB built-in package called bvp4c to ensure that the scheme is valid. It has been perceived that both the results are in best agreement with each other. The effects of associated parameters on the dimensionless velocity, micro-rotation, energy and mass profiles are discussed and depicted graphically. It has been detected that the permeability parameter gives rise in micro-rotation profile.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35169220 PMCID: PMC8847364 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06458-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The fluid flow over a stretching surface.
Figure 2(a–d) The impact of , Mr and Nr on non-dimensional velocity field . (d) Comparison of solution obtained by PCM and bvp4c method.
Figure 3(a–d) Micro rotation profile under the effects of Gr, Nr and Mr. (d) Comparison of solution obtained by PCM and bvp4c method.
Figure 4(a–f) Variation of dimensionless temperature profile with parameters Rd, Pr, Sc, Sr and Du respectively. (f) Comparison of solution obtained by PCM and bvp4c method.
Figure 5(a–d) The effects of parameters Sc, Sr and Du on dimensional less concentration profile respectively. (d) Comparison of solution obtained by PCM and bvp4c method.
Numerical outcomes for skin friction.
| 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37594 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37589 |
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37571 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37568 |
| 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37547 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37551 |
| 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37594 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37587 |
| 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.25938 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.25921 |
| 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.16533 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.16511 |
| 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37594 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.37575 |
| 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.46338 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.46366 |
| 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.55067 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.55053 |
Numerical outcomes for Nusselt number.
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.245742 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.245756 |
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.241842 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.241852 |
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.234106 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.234108 |
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.245742 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.245746 |
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.324886 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.324890 |
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.402525 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.402528 |
Numerical outcomes for Sherwood number.
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.265463 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.265471 |
| 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.264059 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.264066 |
| 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.262655 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.262663 |
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.265463 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.265471 |
| 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.266868 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.266878 |
| 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.268272 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.268280 |
Comparative analysis between bvp4c and PCM techniques for velocity.
| Absolute error | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.000000 | ||
| 0.1 | 0.059923 | 0.121043 | |
| 0.2 | 0.159901 | 0.211168 | |
| 0.3 | 0.259954 | 0.311364 | |
| 0.4 | 0.359994 | 0.411624 | |
| 0.5 | 0.459987 | 0.511937 | |
| 0.6 | 0.559998 | 0.612295 | |
| 0.7 | 0.659935 | 0.713689 | |
| 0.8 | 0.759957 | 0.813110 | |
| 0.9 | 0.859902 | 0.913549 | |
| 10.0 | 0.959946 | 1.023997 |
Comparison between PCM and bvp4c techniques for concentration.
| Absolute error | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 1.000000 | ||
| 0.1 | 0.8879855 | 0.903110 | |
| 0.2 | 0.709875 | 0.717920 | |
| 0.3 | 0.633047 | 0.641694 | |
| 0.4 | 0.568142 | 0.575623 | |
| 0.5 | 0.514767 | 0.519828 | |
| 0.6 | 0.472423 | 0.474360 | |
| 0.7 | 0.440544 | 0.439201 | |
| 0.8 | 0.418529 | 0.414291 | |
| 0.9 | 0.405765 | 0.489496 | |
| 10.0 | 0.401644 | 0.483614 |