Literature DB >> 35168931

Serious Illness Care Programme-contextual factors and implementation strategies: a qualitative study.

Joanna Paladino1, Justin Sanders2,3, Laurel B Kilpatrick4, Ramya Prabhakar5, Pallavi Kumar6, Nina O'Connor6, Brigitte Durieux7, Erik K Fromme2,7, Evan Benjamin2, Suzanne Mitchell2,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Serious Illness Care Programme (SICP) is a multicomponent evidence-based intervention that improves communication about patients' values and goals in serious illness. We aim to characterise implementation strategies for programme delivery and the contextual factors that influence implementation in three 'real-world' health system SICP initiatives.
METHODS: We employed a qualitative thematic framework analysis of field notes collected during the first 1.5 years of implementation and a fidelity survey.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed empiric evidence about implementation and institutional context. All teams successfully implemented clinician training and an electronic health record (EHR) template for documentation of serious illness conversations. When training was used as the primary strategy to engage clinicians, however, clinician receptivity to the programme and adoption of conversations remained limited due to clinical culture-related barriers (eg, clinicians' attitudes, motivations and practice environment). Visible leadership involvement, champion facilitation and automated EHR-based data feedback on documented conversations appeared to improve adoption. Implementing these strategies depended on contextual factors, including leadership support at the specialty level, champion resources and capacity, and EHR capabilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Health systems need multifaceted implementation strategies to move beyond the limited impact of clinician training in driving improvement in serious illness conversations. These include EHR-based data feedback, involvement of specialty leaders to message the programme and align incentives, and local champions to problem-solve frontline challenges longitudinally. Implementation of these strategies depended on a favourable institutional context. Greater attention to the influence of contextual factors and implementation strategies may enable sustained improvements in serious illness conversations at scale. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; End of life care; Service evaluation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35168931     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  1 in total

Review 1.  Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Rebecca Baxter; Erik K Fromme; Anna Sandgren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.