Bradley McGregor1, Peter H O'Donnell2, Arjun Balar3, Daniel Petrylak4, Jonathan Rosenberg5, Evan Y Yu6, David I Quinn7, Elisabeth I Heath8, Mary Campbell9, Zsolt Hepp9, Caroline McKay10, Joyce Steinberg10, Antoine Regnault11, Flora Mazerolle11, Matthew D Galsky12. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 2. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 4. Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA. 5. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 6. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 7. University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 8. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. 9. Seagen Inc., Bothell, WA, USA. 10. Astellas Pharma US, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA. 11. Modus Outcomes, Lyon, France. 12. Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: matthew.galsky@mssm.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The EV-201 trial (NCT03219333) demonstrated a clinically meaningful and durable response rate and a tolerable safety profile with enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC) treated with prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy (cohort 1). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were included in EV-201 as exploratory endpoints. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PRO data for cohort 1 of EV-201 to better understand the relationship between EV therapy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Enrolled patients with LA/mUC who received EV were invited to electronically complete two HRQoL instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L) at baseline and day 1 of each cycle until treatment discontinuation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patient demographics, completion and compliance rates, and PRO scores were analysed using descriptive statistics. Selected EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were analysed post hoc using a repeated-measures mixed model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among treated patients (n = 125), 95% completed both baseline questionnaires. Compliance rates were ≥86% throughout the study. Descriptive analyses showed that global health status, physical functioning, and symptom scores remained stable over time, with average scores similar at each cycle. Lower pain and fatigue scores were observed in responders at cycles following an objective response. Pain was lower at cycle 3 than at baseline in patients with bone metastases. Mean EQ-5D-3L utility score (0.80 at baseline; range from 0.77 at cycle 2 to 0.91 at cycle 10) and visual analogue scale scores (66.9 at baseline; range from 65.5 at cycle 2 to 78.4 at cycle 10) remained similar over time. Variability and the small sample size limited definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: PRO scores remained stable throughout EV treatment, further supporting the overall value of EV in the treatment of patients with LA/mUC. The potential benefit of EV therapy on overall HRQoL and symptoms such as pain and fatigue is currently being explored. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study of adult patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract that progressed after previous medications, quality of life, ability to function, and symptoms did not worsen on treatment with enfortumab vedotin, which is an antibody + drug combination. Some improvements in pain and fatigue were reported by patients, but further research needs to be conducted. These data complement the efficacy and safety data from the EV-201 trial.
BACKGROUND: The EV-201 trial (NCT03219333) demonstrated a clinically meaningful and durable response rate and a tolerable safety profile with enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC) treated with prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy (cohort 1). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were included in EV-201 as exploratory endpoints. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PRO data for cohort 1 of EV-201 to better understand the relationship between EV therapy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Enrolled patients with LA/mUC who received EV were invited to electronically complete two HRQoL instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L) at baseline and day 1 of each cycle until treatment discontinuation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patient demographics, completion and compliance rates, and PRO scores were analysed using descriptive statistics. Selected EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were analysed post hoc using a repeated-measures mixed model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among treated patients (n = 125), 95% completed both baseline questionnaires. Compliance rates were ≥86% throughout the study. Descriptive analyses showed that global health status, physical functioning, and symptom scores remained stable over time, with average scores similar at each cycle. Lower pain and fatigue scores were observed in responders at cycles following an objective response. Pain was lower at cycle 3 than at baseline in patients with bone metastases. Mean EQ-5D-3L utility score (0.80 at baseline; range from 0.77 at cycle 2 to 0.91 at cycle 10) and visual analogue scale scores (66.9 at baseline; range from 65.5 at cycle 2 to 78.4 at cycle 10) remained similar over time. Variability and the small sample size limited definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: PRO scores remained stable throughout EV treatment, further supporting the overall value of EV in the treatment of patients with LA/mUC. The potential benefit of EV therapy on overall HRQoL and symptoms such as pain and fatigue is currently being explored. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study of adult patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract that progressed after previous medications, quality of life, ability to function, and symptoms did not worsen on treatment with enfortumab vedotin, which is an antibody + drug combination. Some improvements in pain and fatigue were reported by patients, but further research needs to be conducted. These data complement the efficacy and safety data from the EV-201 trial.
Authors: Paul G Kluetz; Elektra J Papadopoulos; Laura Lee Johnson; Martha Donoghue; Virginia E Kwitkowski; Wen-Hung Chen; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Ann T Farrell; Patricia Keegan; Geoffrey Kim; Richard Pazdur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David J Vaughn; Catherine M Broome; Maha Hussain; John C Gutheil; Avi B Markowitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David J Vaughn; Joaquim Bellmunt; Yves Fradet; Jae Lyun Lee; Lawrence Fong; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Miguel A Climent; Daniel P Petrylak; Toni K Choueiri; Andrea Necchi; Winald Gerritsen; Howard Gurney; David I Quinn; Stephane Culine; Cora N Sternberg; Yabing Mai; Haojie Li; Rodolfo F Perini; Dean F Bajorin; Ronald de Wit Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kimberley S Mak; Angela B Smith; Alec Eidelman; Rebecca Clayman; Andrzej Niemierko; Jed-Sian Cheng; Jonathan Matthews; Michael R Drumm; Matthew E Nielsen; Adam S Feldman; Richard J Lee; Anthony L Zietman; Ronald C Chen; William U Shipley; Matthew I Milowsky; Jason A Efstathiou Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Angela B Smith; Byron Jaeger; Laura C Pinheiro; Lloyd J Edwards; Hung-Jui Tan; Matthew E Nielsen; Bryce B Reeve Journal: BJU Int Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Kathrin Sommer; Francesco Cottone; Neil K Aaronson; Peter Fayers; Paola Fazi; Gianantonio Rosti; Emanuele Angelucci; Gianluca Gaidano; Adriano Venditti; Maria Teresa Voso; Michele Baccarani; Marco Vignetti; Fabio Efficace Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: PierFranco Conte; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sibylle Loibl; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Gunter von Minckwitz; Max S Mano; Michael Untch; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Norman Wolmark; Priya Rastogi; Veronique D'Hondt; Andrés Redondo; Ljiljana Stamatovic; Hervé Bonnefoi; Hugo Castro-Salguero; Hans H Fischer; Tanya Wahl; Chunyan Song; Thomas Boulet; Peter Trask; Charles E Geyer Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 6.860