| Literature DB >> 35168636 |
Athar Rasekh Jahromi1, Zahra Mosallanezhad1, Fatemeh Saadat Hosini2, Safieh Jamali3, Nader Sharifi4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Infertility has a significant impact on the sexual function of couples. The use of herbal medicine has been highly important throughout the history of medicine. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of date palm on sexual function of infertile couples.Entities:
Keywords: Date palm; Female sexual function index; Infertility; Male sexual function index; Sexual function
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35168636 PMCID: PMC8845224 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-05945-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study
Comparison of groups in terms of demographic variables of participants
| Variable | Group | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Control Group | ||
| Woman's age | 30.01 ± 2.15 | 29.95 ± 3.88 | 0.91 |
| Husband age | 34.24 ± 2.20 | 34.43 ± 4.17 | 0.75 |
| Employment status | |||
| Housewife | 52 (80) | 45 (69.2) | 0.11 |
| Employed | 13 (20) | 20 (30.8) | |
| Educational level | |||
| Primary school | 23 (35.4%) | 15 (23.1) | 0.12 |
| Secondary school | 33 (50.8) | 33 (50.8) | |
| Academic | 9 (13.8) | 17 (26.2) | |
| Husband job | |||
| Non-employed | 0.05 | ||
| Employed | |||
| Husband educational level | |||
| Primary school | 23 (35.4) | 18 (27.7) | 0.08 |
| Secondary school | 34 (52.3) | 29 (44.6) | |
| Academic | 8 (12.3) | 18 (27.7) | |
| Duration of infertility | |||
| Tree years | 23 (35.4) | 28 (43.1) | 0.40 |
| Four years | 30 (46.2) | 30 (46.2) | |
| Five years | 12 (18.5) | 7 (10.8) | |
P value: Independent t-test, Chi square
Comparison of the Sexual function female domains between Control Group and Intervention group (before and after the intervention)
| Domains | Intervention group | Control group | p-value** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Libido | Before | 2.78 ± 0.74 | 2.82 ± .95 | 0.82 |
| After | 4.38 ± 0.71 | 2.92 ± .79 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.48 | ||
| Arousal | Before | 2.87 ± 0.37 | 3.08 ± 1.03 | 0.12 |
| After | 4.86 ± 0.84 | 2.86 ± 0.44 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.1 | ||
| Orgasm | Before | 3.56 ± 1.18 | 3.90 ± 1.47 | 0.14 |
| After | 5.15 ± 0.78 | 3.71 ± 1.16 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.38 | ||
| Lubrication | Before | 3.47 ± 0.91 | 3.14 ± 0.98 | 0.05 |
| After | 4.43 ± 0.79 | 3.35 ± 1.41 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.29 | ||
| Satisfaction | Before | 4.49 ± 0.61 | 4.55 ± 1.35 | 0.76 |
| After | 5.46 ± 0.67 | 4.44 ± 0.72 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.55 | ||
| Pain | Before | 3.86 ± 0.77 | 3.25 ± .71 | 0.19 |
| After | 3.00 ± 0.51 | 3.44 ± 0.74 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.69 | ||
| Total score FSFI | Before | 21.06 ± 2.58 | 21.09 ± 6.60 | 0.97 |
| After | 27.31 ± 2.59 | 20.74 ± 2.66 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | p = 0.67 | ||
*P-value: paired t-test
**P-value: Independent t-test
Comparison of men in the two groups in terms of male erectile function index parameters
| Domains | Intervention group | Control group | p_value** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Erectile function | Before | 22.32 ± 7.39 | 22.96 ± 4.75 | 0.55 |
| After | 26.98 ± 3.04 | 22.43 ± 7.26 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | 0.62 | ||
| Orgasmic function | Before | 7.50 ± 2.88 | 7.26 ± 2.19 | 0.58 |
| After | 9.18 ± 1.40 | 6.75 ± 2.83 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | 0.16 | ||
| Sexual desire | Before | 5.84 ± 2.06 | 5.93 ± 1.36 | 0.76 |
| After | 8.23 ± 1.55 | 5.52 ± 1.73 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | 0.14 | ||
| Intercourse satisfaction | Before | 10.81 ± 3.75 | 11.81 ± 2.96 | 0.07 |
| After | 13.13 ± 1.67 | 11.47 ± 2.32 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | p < 0.0001 | 0.42 | ||
| Overall satisfaction | Before | 8.69 ± 1.80 | 8.21 ± 1.32 | 0.08 |
| After | 9.50 ± 0.86 | 7.72 ± 1.54 | p < 0.0001 | |
| P-value* | 0.001 | 0.07 | ||
*P-value: paired t-test
**P-value: Independent t-test