Literature DB >> 35168096

S1P receptor modulators in Multiple Sclerosis: Detecting a potential skin cancer safety signal.

Vasileios-Periklis Stamatellos1, Antigony Rigas2, Eleni Stamoula3, Aimilios Lallas4, Athina Papadopoulou5, Georgios Papazisis6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: S1P receptor modulators are oral Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis, which were associated with cases of basal cell carcinoma in clinical trials. This study aims at investigating in a real-world adverse event reporting system whether S1P receptor modulators increase the risk of skin cancer reporting, compared to other DMTs.
METHODS: Adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were extracted, cleaned, and analyzed from 2004Q1 until 2020Q4. The crude and adjusted Reported Odds Ratios (cROR, aROR) for the outcomes: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or melanoma were calculated for all DMTs. In a sensitivity analysis, we looked at each outcome separately.
RESULTS: The aROR (95%CI) of siponimod was: 9.68 (5.48-15.79) and of fingolimod 4.54 (3.86-5.32), indicating a safety signal of S1P receptor modulators for skin cancer. Ozanimod had only 52 complete reports without any cases. In the sensitivity analysis, siponimod showed a signal only for basal cell carcinoma: 22.83 (12.27-38.83), while fingolimod for all outcomes separately, including melanoma: 3.02 (2.31-3.89). Notably, among the other DMTs, alemtuzumab: 4.40 (2.98-6.25) and cladribine: 3.28 (1.17-7.13) presented also a signal for disproportionate reporting, while ocrelizumab showed a signal in the sensitivity analysis only for melanoma 2.55 (1.21-4.65).
CONCLUSIONS: S1P receptors seem to increase skin cancer reporting on FAERS, and the association is strongest for basal cell carcinomas. Therefore, close dermatologic surveillance before- and during therapy is needed. Whether fingolimod and ocrelizumab also increase the risk of melanoma needs further investigation.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease-modifying agents for multiple sclerosis; FDA adverse events reporting system; Multiple sclerosis; Neuroimmunology; Neuropharmacology; Pharmacovigilance; S1P receptor modulators; Skin neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35168096     DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord        ISSN: 2211-0348            Impact factor:   4.339


  2 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Sclerosis Drugs Approved Since 2018 and Future Developments.

Authors:  Simon Faissner; Ralf Gold
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.497

2.  Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Up to 5 years of follow-up in the DAYBREAK open-label extension trial.

Authors:  Bruce Ac Cree; Krzysztof W Selmaj; Lawrence Steinman; Giancarlo Comi; Amit Bar-Or; Douglas L Arnold; Hans-Peter Hartung; Xavier Montalbán; Eva K Havrdová; James K Sheffield; Neil Minton; Chun-Yen Cheng; Diego Silva; Ludwig Kappos; Jeffrey A Cohen
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.855

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.