Literature DB >> 35168031

Effects of different cropping systems on ammonia nitrogen load in a typical agricultural watershed of South China.

Jie Jiang1, Jun Li1, Zhaoli Wang2, Xushu Wu1, Chengguang Lai1, Xiaohong Chen3.   

Abstract

The excessive application of agricultural irrigation water and chemical fertilizer has increased crop yields to help meet the demand for food, but it has also led to major water environment problem, i.e. non-point source (NPS) pollution, which needs to be addressed to achieve sustainable development targets. Although numerous studies have focused on the control and reduction of agricultural NPS pollution from the perspective of irrigation and fertilizer, the effects of different cropping systems on NPS pollution (ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N)) in the Dongjiang River Basin (DRB) were seldom assessed. Specifically, variation in the NH3-N load was simulated and analyzed at the annual and semi-annual scales under ten different cropping systems using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, which was calibrated and validated with satisfactory statistical index values in the DRB. The results indicated that the NH3-N load decreased, distinctly increased, slightly decreased when sweet potato, peanut, and rice were planted, respectively. Compared with mono-cropping, crop rotation could reduce the NH3-N load, and the planting sequence of crops could affect the NH3-N load to a certain extent. Planting peanuts in spring would dramatically increase NH3-N load. To evaluate NH3-N pollution, a critical threshold of NH3-N emission (5.1 kg·ha-1·year-1) was proposed. Meeting the NH3-N emission threshold cannot be achieved by altering the cropping system alone; additional measures are needed to reduce agricultural NPS pollution. This study facilitates the development of cropping systems and provides relevant information to aid the sustainable development of agriculture in the DRB.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ammonia nitrogen; Cropping system; Dongjiang River Basin; SWAT; Threshold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35168031     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.103963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  1 in total

1.  Mechanism of Response of Watershed Water Quality to Agriculture Land-Use Changes in a Typical Fuel Ethanol Raw Material Planting Area-A Case Study on Guangxi Province, China.

Authors:  Guannan Cui; Xinyu Bai; Pengfei Wang; Haitao Wang; Shiyu Wang; Liming Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.