| Literature DB >> 35166947 |
Yonghong Li1,2, Yun Wang1, Yingying Liu1, Xuan Li1, Lifei Feng3, Keke Li4.
Abstract
Clostridium butyricum is a spore-forming probiotic which can promote the enhancement of beneficial bacteria and maintain intestinal microecological balance. However, it is difficult to improve the production level of C. butyricum by conventional fermentation process. In this study, a co-fermentation process of C. butyricum DL-1 and Bacillus coagulans ZC2-1 was established to improve the viable counts and spore yield of C. butyricum, and the formula of coculture medium was optimized by flask fermentation. The results showed that the optimum medium composition is 10 g/L bran, 15 g/L corn steep powder, 15 g/L peptone, 1 g/L K2HPO4 and 0.5 g/L MnSO4.Cultured stationarily in the optimal medium for 36 h, the number of viable bacteria of C. butyricum DL-1 reached 1.5 × 108 cfu/mL, Which was 375 times higher than that incubated in the initial medium. The sporulation rate reach 92.6%. The results revealed an economical and effective medium composition for the coculture of C. butyricum and B. coagulans, which achieved a 64.6% cost reduction. The co-fermentation process established in this study provides a new fermentation mode for the industrial production of other absolute anerobic bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus coagulans; Clostridium butyricum; Co-culture; Medium composition; Optimization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35166947 PMCID: PMC8847521 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01354-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig.1Colonial morphology and microscopic structure of the strain ZC2-1, ZA-1, ZB-1 and ZC-9. a–d colonial morphology of ZC2-1, ZA-1, ZB-1 and ZC-9. e–h microscopic structure of ZC2-1, ZA-1, ZB-1 and ZC-9 observed by microscope with 1000 folds amplification
Fig. 2Phylogenetic trees constructed by the Neighbor-Joining approach. The GenBank accession numbers of the strains are shown in the parentheses
Fig. 3The effect of carbon
source types on the viable counts and spore yield of C. butyricum
The optimized results of compound nitrogen source
| Nitrogen source | Spore rate (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Group1 Group2 Group3 Group4 Group5 Group6 Group7 Group8 Group9 Contrast | 4.8 7.1 3.1 4.0 5.0 1.8 4.5 4.2 2.3 5.6 | 4.1 5.8 2.4 2.2 1.7 0.9 2.1 2.7 1.3 3.5 | 85.4 81.7 77.4 55.0 34.0 50.0 46.7 64.3 56.5 62.5 |
Group1 to 9 indicate the combination of corn steep powder with soybean meal powder, peptone, beef paste, fishmeal, tryptone, yeast extract, yeast, NH4Cl and (NH4)2SO4 respectively. The ratio of corn steep powder to other nitrogen sources is 1:1, and the total nitrogen source content is 15 g/L. 15 g/L corn steep powder was used as control
The orthogonal experiment design table (L9 (33) for carbon
source and nitrogen source concentration and results analysis
| Level | Bran (g/L) | Peptone (g/L) | Corn steep powder (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 5.8 | 4.4 |
| 2 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 8.5 | 7.4 |
| 3 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| 4 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 7.4 | 5.7 |
| 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 8.2 | 6.1 |
| 6 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5.6 | 3.9 |
| 7 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 6.5 | 3.5 |
| 8 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 3.1 | 2.7 |
| 9 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5.8 | 3.5 |
| ‾K1a | 7.23 | 5.00 | 6.03 | ||
| ‾K2a | 5.93 | 6.87 | 5.37 | ||
| ‾K3a | 5.83 | 7.13 | 7.60 | ||
| RA | 1.40 | 2.13 | 2.23 | ||
| ‾K1b | 5.53 | 3.80 | 3.80 | ||
| ‾K2b | 4.10 | 4..93 | 4.10 | ||
| ‾K3b | 4.50 | 5.40 | 6.23 | ||
| RB | 1.43 | 1.60 | 2.43 |
K value stands for the mean value, for example, K1a, K2a and K3a correspond to A are the mean values of factor A, at level 1, level 2, and level 3, respectively, and so on. R stand for range value, correspond to the different between the highest k value and the lowest k value. English letter A and B in rang analysis results stand for the results of C. butyricum DL-1 viable counts and spore yields, respectively
Fig. 4The effect of inorganic salts on C. butyricum’s viable counts and spore yield. The concentration of NaCl and KCl was 5 g/L, the concentration of K2HPO4 and CaCO3 was 1 g/L, the concentration of MnSO4 and MgSO4 was 0.3 g/L, the concentration of Sodium acetate trihydrate was 3 g/L, with no inorganic saltsadded in control experiment
Fig. 5Growth curve and DO curve of the two strains in optimized coculture medium
Cost comparison of our medium and reported medium
| Input | Price | Reported MediumQ | Newly designed medium | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (USD/Kga) | (g/Lb) | (USD/Lc) | (g/L) | (USD/L) | ||
| Glucose | 249 | 2.44 | 0.608 | – | – | |
| Yeast extract | 224 | 2.08 | 0.466 | – | – | |
| Tryptone | 448 | 1 | 0.045 | – | – | |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 175 | 0.1 | 0.018 | – | – | |
| NaHCO3 | 142 | 0.1 | 0.014 | – | – | |
| MnSO4·H2O | 151 | 0.02 | 0.003 | 0.5 | 0.0755 | |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 75 | 0.02 | 0.0015 | – | – | |
| CaCl2 | 161 | 0.002 | 0.0003 | – | – | |
| Bran | 0.255 | – | 10 | 0.00255 | ||
| Corn steep powder | 0.413 | – | 15 | 0.006195 | ||
| Peptone | 0.295 | – | 15 | 0.004425 | ||
| K2HPO4 | 320 | – | 1 | 0.32 | ||
| Total (USD/L) | 1.1558 | 0.40867 | ||||
Q: Formula reported by Qing Kong et al
aCost of each component was calculated based on Sigma-Aldrich prices (accessed on December 2020)
bAmount of component (g) per liter of medium
cCost of component per liter of medium