| Literature DB >> 35166209 |
Juliana A R Moreira1, Israel C Vasconcelos1, José L Fachi1, Viviane Theodoro1, Rodrigo A Dalia1, Andrea A Aro1, Edson R Pimentel2, Fernanda O G Gaspi1, Thiago A M Andrade1, Maria E C Amaral1, Marcelo A M Esquisatto1, Fernanda A S Mendonça1, Gláucia M T Santos3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The repair of burns in diabetic patients is a clinical problem. It is relevant to study alternative therapies that can improve the healing process. Our aim was to investigate the effects of Solidago chilensis associated or not with laser on burns in diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; InGaP laser; LLLT; Plant extracts; Skin burns; Solidago chilensis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35166209 PMCID: PMC8847841 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed J ISSN: 2319-4170 Impact factor: 4.910
Morphometric parameters evaluated in the wound healing process of second-degree burns in rats diabetics in different treatment groups and experimental periods.
| Experimental periods | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Groups | |||
| N of fibroblasts (n/104°μm2) | C | 13.2 ± 3.4 | 22.8 ± 3.8 | 27.4 ± 3.9 |
| S | 12.1 ± 3.9 | 20.8 ± 4.2 | 27.9 ± 3.4 | |
| L | 23.2 ± 4.1 | 31.1 ± 3.2 | 37.2 ± 4.3 | |
| LS | 24.2 ± 3.5 | 31.2 ± 4.1 | 37.4 ± 3.5 | |
| N of inflammatory infiltrate (n/104 μm2) | C | 20.6 ± 2.8 | 17.1 ± 2.1 | 7.7 ± 1.2 |
| S | 17.2 ± 1.7 | 13.7 ± 2.2 | 5.2 ± 1.3 | |
| L | 17.1 ± 1.3 | 12.7 ± 1.8 | 5.1 ± 1.6 | |
| LS | 16.2 ± 1.5 | 11.9 ± 2.2 | 5.2 ± 1.5 | |
| N of vessels (n/104 μm2) | C | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
| S | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | |
| L | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | |
| LS | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.4 |
Values are the mean and standard deviation of each group and were compared by ANOVA with Tukey's post-test (p < 0,05).
Significant difference.
Fig. 1Imunoblotting analysis for Collagen I and III, TGF-β1, VEGF and bFGF in the wound healing process in C, S, L and LS groups in 7 (7 d), 14 (14 d) and 21 (21 d) days after injury. Typical blots are shown above average densitometry results. Values are the mean and standard deviation of each group were compared by ANOVA wich Tukey's post-test (p < 0.05) (∗) significant difference.
Biochemical parameters evaluated in the wound healing process of second-degree burns in rats diabetics in different treatment groups and experimental periods.
| Experimental periods | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Groups | |||
| Glycosaminoglycans (μg/mg of dry tissue) | C | 1.26 ± 0.14 | 1.39 ± 0.17 | 1.67 ± 0.14 |
| S | 1.29 ± 0.16 | 1.45 ± 0.16 | 1.65 ± 0.15 | |
| L | 1.79 ± 0.13 | 1.93 ± 0.13 | 1.96 ± 0.13 | |
| LS | 1.78 ± 0.16 | 1.92 ± 0.14 | 1.93 ± 0.14 | |
| Hydroxyproline (μg/mg of dry tissue) | C | 108.9 ± 14.1 | 93.1 ± 17.2 | 89.8 ± 14.2 |
| S | 117.2 ± 16.2 | 96.4 ± 17.1 | 98.6 ± 15.4 | |
| L | 116.4 ± 17.2 | 91.6 ± 13.4 | 89.4 ± 18.3 | |
| LS | 112.9 ± 16.4 | 92.7 ± 14.6 | 92.2 ± 17.1 | |
Values are the mean and standard deviation of each group and were compared by ANOVA with Tukey's post-test (p < 0.05).
Significant difference.
Fig. 2Zymogram for analyzing the isoforms latent (92 kDa) and active (83 kDa) of MMP-9; and the intermediate isoforms (68 kDa) and active (62 kDa) of MMP-2 in C, S, L and LS groups 7 (7 d), 14 (14 d) and 21 (21 d) days after lesions.
Densitometry of the bands (pixels) corresponding the respective isoforms in the lesion area of second-degree burns in diabetics rats in different treatment groups and experimental periods.
| Groups | C | S | L | LS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isoforms | Periods | ||||
| MMP-9 | 7 d | 17.94 ± 6.12 | 56.33 ± 7.23 | 32.87 ± 6.39 | 58.97 ± 8.42 |
| latent | 14 d | 49.77 ± 9.93 | 52.38 ± 7.44 | 51.78 ± 8.99 | 49.85 ± 9.40 |
| 92 kDa | 21 d | 42.12 ± 5.73 | 28.92 ± 7.08 | 35.94 ± 8.22 | 48.86 ± 9.55 |
| MMP-9 | 7 d | 9.67 ± 2.32 | 48.22 ± 8.11 | 31.87 ± 8.82 | 56.43 ± 9.77 |
| active | 14 d | 6.21 ± 2.21 | 39.73 ± 8.69 | 37.89 ± 5.72 | 1.0 ± 0.00 |
| 83 kDa | 21 d | 5.33 ± 1.93 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| MMP-2 | 7 d | 18.42 ± 5.32 | 14.84 ± 4.85 | 10.94 ± 2.94 | 44.75 ± 5.35 |
| intermediate | 14 d | 17.91 ± 3,75 | 15.27 ± 2.92 | 48.48 ± 9.14 | 58.11 ± 6.22 |
| 68 kDa | 21 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 13.31 ± 6.22 | 51.92 ± 5.89 | 55.91 ± 6.55 |
| MMP-2 | 7 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| Active | 14 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 59.24 ± 7.47 | 61.38 ± 8.94 |
| 62 kDa | 21 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 12.92 ± 6.88 | 64.31 ± 7.11 | 59.89 ± 7.92 |
Values are the mean and standard deviation of each group and were compared by ANOVA with Tukey's post-test (p < 0.05).
Significant difference.